Tommaso Giani1,2, Alberto Antonelli1, Samanta Sennati3, Vincenzo Di Pilato1, Adriana Chiarelli3, Antonio Cannatelli3, Christopher Gatsch1, Francesco Luzzaro4, Teresa Spanu5, Stefania Stefani6, Gian Maria Rossolini1,3. 1. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. 2. Microbiology and Virology Unit, Florence Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy. 3. Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. 4. Clinical Microbiology and Virology Unit, Lecco A. Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy. 5. Institute of Microbiology, A. Gemelli University Hospital, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. 6. Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, section of Microbiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against a recent Italian collection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolated from urine specimens. METHODS: Consecutive Gram-negative isolates from urine specimens, collected from inpatients in five Italian hospitals during the period October 2016 to February 2017, were screened for CRE phenotype using chromogenic selective medium and identified using MALDI-TOF MS. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by reference broth microdilution (BMD) and, for ceftazidime/avibactam, also by Etest® CZA. Results were interpreted according to the EUCAST breakpoints. All confirmed CRE were subjected to real-time PCR targeting blaKPC-type, blaVIM-type, blaNDM-type and blaOXA-48-type carbapenemase genes. Non-MBL-producing isolates resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam were subjected to WGS and their resistome and clonality were analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 318 non-replicate presumptive CRE were collected following screening of 9405 isolates of Enterobacterales (3.4%) on chromogenic selective medium. Molecular analysis revealed that 216 isolates were positive for a carbapenemase gene (of which 92.1%, 2.8%, 1.4% and 1.4% were positive for blaKPC-type, blaOXA-48-type, blaNDM-type and blaVIM-type, respectively). Against the confirmed carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), ceftazidime/avibactam was the most active compound, followed by colistin (susceptibility rates 91.6% and 69.4%, respectively). Compared with BMD, Etest® for ceftazidime/avibactam yielded consistent results (100% category agreement). All class B β-lactamase producers were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, while OXA-48 and KPC producers were susceptible, with the exception of seven KPC-producing isolates (4.2%). The latter exhibited an MIC of 16 to >32 mg/L, belonged to ST512, produced KPC-3 and showed alterations in the OmpK35 and Ompk36 porins. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime/avibactam showed potent in vitro activity against a recent Italian collection of CPE from urine.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against a recent Italian collection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolated from urine specimens. METHODS: Consecutive Gram-negative isolates from urine specimens, collected from inpatients in five Italian hospitals during the period October 2016 to February 2017, were screened for CRE phenotype using chromogenic selective medium and identified using MALDI-TOF MS. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by reference broth microdilution (BMD) and, for ceftazidime/avibactam, also by Etest® CZA. Results were interpreted according to the EUCAST breakpoints. All confirmed CRE were subjected to real-time PCR targeting blaKPC-type, blaVIM-type, blaNDM-type and blaOXA-48-type carbapenemase genes. Non-MBL-producing isolates resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam were subjected to WGS and their resistome and clonality were analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 318 non-replicate presumptive CRE were collected following screening of 9405 isolates of Enterobacterales (3.4%) on chromogenic selective medium. Molecular analysis revealed that 216 isolates were positive for a carbapenemase gene (of which 92.1%, 2.8%, 1.4% and 1.4% were positive for blaKPC-type, blaOXA-48-type, blaNDM-type and blaVIM-type, respectively). Against the confirmed carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), ceftazidime/avibactam was the most active compound, followed by colistin (susceptibility rates 91.6% and 69.4%, respectively). Compared with BMD, Etest® for ceftazidime/avibactam yielded consistent results (100% category agreement). All class B β-lactamase producers were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, while OXA-48 and KPC producers were susceptible, with the exception of seven KPC-producing isolates (4.2%). The latter exhibited an MIC of 16 to >32 mg/L, belonged to ST512, produced KPC-3 and showed alterations in the OmpK35 and Ompk36 porins. CONCLUSIONS:Ceftazidime/avibactam showed potent in vitro activity against a recent Italian collection of CPE from urine.
Authors: Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Andrew R Mack; Magdalena A Taracila; Robert A Bonomo Journal: Infect Dis Clin North Am Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 5.982
Authors: Dafna Yahav; Christian G Giske; Alise Grāmatniece; Henrietta Abodakpi; Vincent H Tam; Leonard Leibovici Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Vittoria Mattioni Marchetti; Ibrahim Bitar; Mario Sarti; Elena Fogato; Erika Scaltriti; Chiara Bracchi; Jaroslav Hrabak; Stefano Pongolini; Roberta Migliavacca Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-01-06