| Literature DB >> 31957868 |
Todd M Owen1, Wayne W Fisher1, Jessica S Akers1, William E Sullivan2, Terry S Falcomata3, Brian D Greer1, Henry S Roane2, Amanda N Zangrillo1.
Abstract
Functional analyses sometimes do not identify momentary fluctuations in the function of destructive behavior (Bowman, Fisher, Thompson, & Piazza, 1997). In such cases, individuals may mand for the reinforcer that is currently most preferred and display destructive behavior if that mand goes unreinforced. In this study, we conducted a mand analysis to test whether destructive behavior functioned as a precurrent response that increased reinforcement for the participant's mands. We then evaluated a treatment that matched this function of destructive behavior by providing differential or time-based reinforcement of participant mands in accordance with multiple or chained schedules with reinforcement-schedule thinning. Decreases in destructive behavior averaged 97.4% across cases. We discuss these results relative to the importance of matching treatments for destructive behavior to operant functions for both traditional and idiosyncratic functions of destructive behavior.Entities:
Keywords: functional analysis; mand analysis; mand compliance function; precurrent response
Year: 2020 PMID: 31957868 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Behav Anal ISSN: 0021-8855