Literature DB >> 31957788

The effect of feed form and delivery method on feed microbiology and growth performance in grow-finisher pigs.

Fiona M O'Meara1,2, Gillian E Gardiner2, John V O'Doherty3, Peadar G Lawlor1.   

Abstract

There is no generally accepted optimal feed form and delivery method for feeding finisher pigs. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of feed form (meal and pellet) and delivery method (liquid, dry, and wet/dry) on feed microbiology and growth, gain-to-feed ratio (G:F), and carcass quality of finisher pigs. Two batches of pigs were used, each with six pen replicates per treatment. In each batch 216 pigs (32.7 kg; ± 0.48 SE) housed in same-sex (entire male or female) pens of six pigs per pen were on treatment for ~62 d prior to slaughter. The experiment was a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement with two factors for diet form (meal and pellets) and three factors for feed delivery (dry, wet/dry, liquid). The treatments were 1) meal from dry feeder, 2) meal from wet/dry feeder, 3) meal from liquid system, 4) pellet from dry feeder, 5) pellet from wet/dry feeder, and 6) pellet from liquid system. Pig growth performance was determined, blood samples collected at slaughter for hematological analysis and microbiological and proximate analysis of feed performed. A significant feed form × delivery interaction was found for G:F. During the overall period G:F was 0.446, 0.433, 0.423, 0.474, 0.459, and 0.418 g/g (SE = 0.0080; P < 0.01) for treatments 1 through 6, respectively. When feed was pelleted, G:F was improved when feed delivery was dry or wet/dry compared to meal but when the delivery was liquid, pelleting did not affect G:F. There were no interactive effects for overall average daily gain (ADG). Overall ADG was 1,114 and 1,156 g/d (SE = 16.9; P < 0.01) for pigs fed diets in meal and pellet form, respectively and 1,080, 1,114, and 1,210 g/d (SE = 18.4; P < 0.001) for dry-, wet/dry-, and liquid-fed pigs, respectively. Carcass weight was 76.6 and 79.0 kg (SE = 0.55; P < 0.001) for pigs fed in meal and pellet form, respectively, while it was 74.7, 77.3, and 81.5 kg (SE = 0.60; P < 0.001) for pigs delivered dry, wet/dry, and liquid diets, respectively. Lactic acid bacteria (P < 0.05) and yeast (P < 0.01) counts in troughs were greater for the liquid than the dry diet in both meal and pelleted form. There was also evidence of lysine degradation in the liquid diet but this did not impact pig growth. Feeding the diet in pelleted vs. meal form led to lower hemoglobin and greater white blood cell and neutrophil counts (P < 0.05). To conclude, wet/dry feeding of a pelleted diet is recommended to maximize growth rate while optimizing G:F in grow-finisher pigs.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dry feed; fattener; liquid feed; meal; pellet; swine

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31957788      PMCID: PMC7205396          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  26 in total

1.  Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  D Hurst; L Clarke; I J Lean
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Fermented liquid feed for pigs.

Authors:  Joris A M Missotten; Joris Michiels; Anneke Ovyn; Stefaan De Smet; Noël A Dierick
Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Effects of particle size and drying methods of corn on growth performance, digestibility and haematological and immunological characteristics of weaned piglets.

Authors:  Chang Huang; Jianjun Zang; Peixia Song; Peixin Fan; Jingshu Chen; Dewen Liu; Pingli He; Xi Ma
Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Effect of feed particle size and feed processing on morphological characteristics in the small and large intestine of pigs and on adhesion of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT12 in the ileum in vitro.

Authors:  M S Hedemann; L L Mikkelsen; P J Naughton; B B Jensen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effects of eating space and availability of water in feeders on productivity and eating behavior of grower/finisher pigs.

Authors:  H W Gonyou; Z Lou
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Liquid diets accelerate the growth of early-weaned pigs and the effects are maintained to market weight.

Authors:  J H Kim; K N Heo; J Odle; K Han; R J Harrell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Feeding management practices and feed characteristics associated with Salmonella prevalence in live and slaughtered market-weight finisher swine: a systematic review and summation of evidence from 1950 to 2005.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; T Denagamage; J M Sargeant; A Rajić; J McKean
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  Salmonella occurrence and Enterobacteriaceae counts in pig feed ingredients and compound feed from feed mills in Ireland.

Authors:  Anne Marie Burns; Peadar G Lawlor; Gillian E Gardiner; Evonne M McCabe; Des Walsh; Manal Mohammed; Jim Grant; Geraldine Duffy
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.670

9.  Effects of diet form and feeder adjustment on growth performance of nursery and finishing pigs.

Authors:  J E Nemechek; M D Tokach; S S Dritz; E D Fruge; E L Hansen; R D Goodband; J M DeRouchey; J C Woodworth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application.

Authors:  John F Patience; Mariana C Rossoni-Serão; Néstor A Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Blood and faecal biomarkers to assess dietary energy, protein and amino acid efficiency of utilization by growing and finishing pigs.

Authors:  Jordi Camp Montoro; David Solà-Oriol; Ramon Muns; Josep Gasa; Núria Llanes; Edgar Garcia Manzanilla
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-07-04

2.  Effect of Phase Feeding, Space Allowance and Mixing on Productive Performance of Grower-Finisher Pigs.

Authors:  Jordi Camp Montoro; Joana Pessoa; David Solà-Oriol; Ramon Muns; Josep Gasa; Edgar Garcia Manzanilla
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Effects of age and diet forms on growth-development patterns, serum metabolism indicators, and parameters of body fat deposition in Cherry Valley ducks.

Authors:  Gang Lv; Qiufeng Zeng; Xuemei Ding; Shiping Bai; Keying Zhang
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2021-06-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.