Literature DB >> 31957741

Cost of making a comprehensive ophthalmologist and role of non-government institutes: Our experience.

Javed Hussain Farooqui1, Umang Mathur1, Sima Das2, Ashish Saksena3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31957741      PMCID: PMC7003582          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_980_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
India is at a cross roads of development, probably still a work in progress. On one hand we are emerging as an economic superpower, but on the other, we are being challenged in providing basic healthcare services to masses.[1] Some would argue that the innumerable new hospitals and eye care setups symbolize development; but we wonder where the manpower to run these hospitals is. Do we have enough “well trained” ophthalmologists to make these models successful? In 2014, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital (SCEH), a Non-Government Organization (NGO), based in Delhi with multiple satellite branches, started a 2-year community-based cataract fellowship to train budding ophthalmologists in comprehensive ophthalmology and cataract surgery. Until now 14 ophthalmologists have successfully completed this program and 11 are currently enrolled. The program starts with clinical orientation of enrolled candidates. A 15-day induction program is organized, and candidates are made familiar with workings of the hospital. On first 2 days, there are didactic lectures and hands-on sessions by faculty from various departments on important clinical conditions and diagnostic procedures [Table 1a and b]. Since the trainees are a small group with diverse training background, individual attention is given and if the candidate feels he/she needs more discussion on a particular topic, appropriate arrangements are made. The curriculum of the program is such that the trainee spends the first 3 months at the base hospital, getting trained in clinics for diagnosis and management along with manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) in the Operation room (OR) under direct supervision of faculty members. Equal importance is given to clinical rotations, and the trainee is posted with one faculty member in clinics during the day and afternoons are reserved for surgeries. The trainee is then sent to a residential satellite hospital (once the faculty and trainee are both confident of the trainees clinical skills) to see patients, operate and in process enhance skill and serve the community. He/she is called back to the base hospital (SCEH) in Delhi at the end of 12-15 months for a 1-month phacoemulsification intensive training program. Once the trainee is relatively independent in performing phacoemulsification, he/she is sent to the satellite hospital for last 8-11 months. This is the time when trainee contributes to hospital's revenue by performing paid cataract surgeries alongside the community surgeries, which they had already been performing.
Table 1

(a and b): Schedule for first two days during induction

Day1TopicsFaculty
9.30 AM-10 AMIntroduction and history takingConsultant
10 AM-10.10 AMPediatric quizPediatrics consultant
10.10 AM-11 AMGlass prescription, squint examination, pupil examinationPediatrics consultant
11 AM-11.15 AMAmblyopia managementPediatrics consultant
11.15 AM-12.45 PMHands-on squint evaluationPediatrics consultant
12.45 PM-1.15 PMLunch break
1.15 PM-1.25 PMGlaucoma quiz
1.25 PM-2 PMGonioscopy technique and instrumentation Applanation tonometry Optic disc evaluation with 90dGlaucoma consultant
2 PM-3.15 PMHands on at, gonioscopy, disc evaluationGlaucoma consultant
3.30 PM-3.45 PMTea break
3.45 PM-4.10 PMEvaluation of epiphora Lacrimal syringing and interpretationOculoplasty consultant
4.10 PM-5 PMHands - on syringingOculoplasty consultant

Day 2TopicsFaculty

9.30 AM-9.40 AMCornea quizCornea consultant
9.40 AM-10.20 AMSlit - lamp examination techniques Corneal scrapping for ulcersCornea consultant
10.20 AM-11.50 AMCorneal diagrams and color coding Dry eye evaluationCornea consultant
11.50 AM-12.30 PMHands-on slit-lamp examination, corneal scrappingCornea consultant
12.30 PM-1.15 PMLunch break
1.15 PM-1.25 PMRetina quiz
1.25 PM-2.15 PMIndirect ophthalmoscopy technique and instrumentation Retina diagrams Color codingRetina consultant
2.15 PM-3.30 PMHands-on retina examinationRetina consultant
3.30 PM-4.00PMTea break
4 PM-5 PMEvaluation/revision feedbackRetina consultant
(a and b): Schedule for first two days during induction We did a cost analysis of our training module, to better understand our functioning expenses. We divided the expenses into fixed and annual costs. Fixed costs [Table 2] were the one-time costs incurred by the institute (equipment, infrastructure, salaries of trainers etc.). Annual Cost was divided into three subgroups – first 3 months, 4-15 months and 17-24 months, and the phacoemulsification-training month [Table 3]. Other costs of training the trainers, quality assurances, accommodation charges, stipends and hospital administration charges are discussed in Table 4.
Table 2

One time and fixed cost. INR: Indian Rupees

One time and fixed support

ParticularApprox. Cost Amt. (INR)
Wet lab support8,00,000
Microscope with camera40,00,000
Laptop40,000
Projector1,00,000
OPD equipment Slit Lamp with attachments (INR 10,000) Auto-Refractometer (INR 1,50,000) Lensometer (INR 60,000) A-Scan (INR 20,000) Non-Contact Tonometer (INR 40,000) Indirect Ophthalmoscope (INR 20,000)9,30,000
Total58,50,000
Table 3

Annual training costs during different phases of fellowship. MSICS, Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery; OPD, Out Patient Department; VC, Vision Center; INR, Indian Rupees

ActivityParticularsCost per Candidate per month (INR)
0-3 months Activity and Cost per month (MSICS intensive training, OPD skills, Managerial skills)Full time surgical mentor1. OPD skills Mentorship 2. Surgery supervision/Mentorship1,25,000
OT1 circulating and 1 scrub nurse25,000
OT chargesOT fixed costs75,000
Patient acquisition chargesCamps/VC/Outreach team5000
ConsumablesApprox. 15 cases/month/per candidate15,000
Wet labTechnician full time12500
Consumables for wet lab candidate2500
Surgeon mentorship (part time: 10%)12,500
4-15 months and 17-24 months (Satellite Hospital Posting)Remote Mentoring and distance learning; senior consultant1. Grievance redressal; 2. Credentialing and Privileging; 3. Scheduling; 4. Personal issues5000
Phaco Intensive training at DelhiFull time surgical mentor1. OPD skills mentorship; 2. Surgery supervision mentorship1,25,000
OT1 circulating and 1 scrub nurse25,000
OT chargesOT fixed costs75,000
Patient acquisition chargesCamps/VC/Outreach team5000
ConsumablesApprox. 20 cases/month/per candidate40,000
Wet labTechnician full time12,500
Consumables for wet lab candidate2500
Surgeon mentor ship (part time- 10%)12,500
Total Cost Per Candidate per year6,70,000
Table 4

Miscellaneous costs. HBP- Hospital-based Programs, INR- Indian Rupees

ActivityParticularCost per Candidate per year (INR)
Train the trainers workshop (one per year)Improving training capability40,000
HBP program (once every 6 months)Travel of mentor2400
Quality improvement1. Remote Classes capability- Zoom/Internet 2. Training of Nurses/Optometrists 3. Travel of candidate40,000
Administration supportPart-time officer48,000
Monthly stipendPaid to the trainee60,000
Accommodation costsProvided free of cost5000
Total Cost per Candidate per year9,12,800
One time and fixed cost. INR: Indian Rupees Annual training costs during different phases of fellowship. MSICS, Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery; OPD, Out Patient Department; VC, Vision Center; INR, Indian Rupees Miscellaneous costs. HBP- Hospital-based Programs, INR- Indian Rupees The purpose of sharing these figures is to provoke thought in the minds of our readers. How much can various NGOs stretch in preparing ophthalmologists for national duties? Is it just our responsibility, or should the Government be expected to contribute, is a question we feel all the readers should answer. We acknowledge that once the ophthalmologist is trained, he/she does contribute immensely to the functioning of the hospital (and even helps in revenue generation by the end of the training period); but still, costs cannot be ignored. Probably that is the reason why we do not have enough non-government training institutes, and most of the training responsibilities are shared by a handful of non-government institutes nationwide. Residency programs around the country are doing a very efficient job in preparing ophthalmologists, but there is still scope for major improvements.[2] In the United States, 86% residents[3] feel confident in practicing comprehensive ophthalmology after 3 years of training. We are not sure what that proportion would be in our country, but recent surveys have shown residents to have performed no more than a mean of 75 MSICS[4] and 30 phacoemulsification surgeries[4] during their postgraduation, some figures suggesting 50% of postgraduates not having performed any phacoemulsification during their 3 years.[5] These figures show that even though at the end of 3 years the residents are certified to practice ophthalmology, most of them would not be confident enough to do so. This highlights the role of NGOs like ours, who share Government responsibility by facilitating further skills of ophthalmologists and hence, indirectly in their career development. Few recommendations can come out of this correspondence. Government should identify centers where these courses can take place, and we could have Government-approved centers for the same. It can be a continuation of the 3-year postgraduation, where in the resident can spend another 2 years at a Government-recognized center, by which he/she betters his/her clinical and surgical skill, and at the same time serves the community at large. This is the time for all involved partners in ophthalmology training to form a consortium and have representation in government discussions and policy making for training curriculums. A more inclusive approach is needed in coming years where Government should assist consortium members, both intellectually and financially, in preparing a “well trained” ophthalmologist who is independent, confident and can successfully contribute to alleviating preventable blindness from our country.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

1.  Perceptions of recent ophthalmology residency graduates regarding preparation for practice.

Authors:  Peter J McDonnell; Thomas J Kirwan; Gregory S Brinton; Karl C Golnik; Robert F Melendez; David W Parke; Ann Renucci; Jennifer Hasenyager Smith; Ronald E Smith
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Health status and health care services in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar: a comparative study.

Authors:  Manjaree Anand
Journal:  Indian J Public Health       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

3.  Ophthalmology residency training in India: Quo vadis?

Authors:  Santosh G Honavar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Ophthalmology postgraduate training in India: Stirring up a hornet's nest.

Authors:  Amod Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Residency Evaluation and Adherence Design Study III: Ophthalmology residency training in India: Then and now-Improving with time?

Authors:  Partha Biswas; Parikshit Madhav Gogate; Quresh Badr Maskati; Sundaram Natarajan; Lalit Verma; Payal K Bansal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.