Literature DB >> 31957122

Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer.

Amer Amin1,2,3,4, Alexandar Blazevski1,2,3,4, James Thompson2,3,5, Matthijs J Scheltema2,3,6, Michael S Hofman7,8, Declan Murphy8,9, Nathan Lawrentschuk8,9,10,11, Niranjan Sathianathen9, Jada Kapoor9, Henry H Woo12,13, Venu Chalasani14, Krishan Rasiah3,15, Pim J van Leeuwen16, Reuben Tang1, Thomas Cusick3, Phillip Stricker2,3,4, Louise Emmett1,3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Primary objectives: To determine the additive value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission topography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) when combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men undergoing initial biopsy for suspicion of PCa, and to determine the proportion of men who could have avoided prostate biopsy with positive mpMRI (PI-RADS ≥3) but negative PSMA-PET/CT. Secondary objectives: To determine the proportion of men who had csPCa detected only by PSMA-PET/CT or only by systematic prostate biopsy; to compare index lesions by template biopsies vs targeted lesions identified on mpMRI or PSMA-PET/CT; to assess whether there may be health economic benefit or harm if PSMA-PET/CT is incorporated into the diagnostic algorithm; and to develop a nomogram which combines clinical, imaging and biomarker data to predict the likelihood of csPCa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PRIMARY trial is a multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional study that meets the criteria for level 1 evidence in diagnostic test evaluation. PRIMARY will investigate if a limited (pelvic-only) PSMA-PET/CT in combination with routine mpMRI can reliably discriminate men with csPCa from those without csPCa. We conducted a power calculation based on pilot data and will recruit up to 600 men who will undergo PSMA-PET/CT (the index test), mpMRI (standard test) and transperineal template + targeted (PSMA-PET/CT and/or mpMRI) biopsies (reference test). The conduct and reporting of the mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT will be blinded to each other.
RESULTS: The PRIMARY trial will measure and compare sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of both mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT vs targeted prostrate biopsy. The results will be used to determine the proportion of men who could safely avoid biopsy without compromising detection of csPCa. Furthermore, we will assess whether there is a health economic benefit in incorporating PSMA-PET/CT into the diagnostic algorithm.
CONCLUSIONS: This trial will provide robust prospective data to determine the diagnostic ability of PSMA-PET/CT used in addition to mpMRI. It will establish if certain patients can avoid biopsy in the investigation of PCa.
© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PSMA; PSMA-PET scan; clinically significant prostate cancer; multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 31957122     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of PSMA PET/CT Imaging in Prostate Cancer Radiation Treatment.

Authors:  Esther Mena; Liza Lindenberg; Peter Choyke
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Felix Feng; Kirsten L Greene; James L Gulley; Michael Hofman; Bridget F Koontz; Daniel W Lin; Michael J Morris; Steve P Rowe; Trevor J Royce; Simpa Salami; Bital Savir-Baruch; Sandy Srinivas; Thomas A Hope
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 11.082

Review 3.  Update of PSMA Theranostics in Prostate Cancer: Current Applications and Future Trends.

Authors:  Chalermrat Kaewput; Sobhan Vinjamuri
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Overdiagnosis in urologic cancer : For World Journal of Urology Symposium on active surveillance in prostate and renal cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following focal ablation with irreversible electroporation: feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandar Blazevski; William Gondoputro; Matthijs J Scheltema; Amer Amin; Bart Geboers; Daniela Barreto; Anne-Maree Haynes; Ron Shnier; Warick Delprado; Shikha Agrawal; James E Thompson; Phillip D Stricker
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Does a screening digital rectal exam provide actionable clinical utility in patients with an elevated PSA and positive MRI?

Authors:  Courtney M Chang; Andrew G McIntosh; Daniel D Shapiro; John W Davis; John F Ward; Justin R Gregg
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-05-04

7.  Radiotherapy treatment modification for prostate cancer patients based on PSMA-PET/CT.

Authors:  Vasileios Karagiannis; Viktor Wichmann; Juha Saarinen; Natalja Eigeliene; Heidi Andersen; Antti Jekunen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sean Ong; Matthew Leonardo; Thilakavathi Chengodu; Dominic Bagguley; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27

Review 9.  Personalized strategies in population screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Remmers; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  The Role of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in the Characterization of High-Risk Primary Prostate Cancer: Comparison with [11C]Choline PET/CT and Histopathological Analysis.

Authors:  Lucia Zanoni; Riccardo Mei; Lorenzo Bianchi; Francesca Giunchi; Lorenzo Maltoni; Cristian Vincenzo Pultrone; Cristina Nanni; Irene Bossert; Antonella Matti; Riccardo Schiavina; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Cristina Fonti; Filippo Lodi; Antonietta D'Errico; Eugenio Brunocilla; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.