Literature DB >> 31957069

Workflow for highly porous resorbable custom 3D printed scaffolds using medical grade polymer for large volume alveolar bone regeneration.

Michal Bartnikowski1, Cedryck Vaquette1, Sašo Ivanovski1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the design, workflow, and manufacture of highly porous, resorbable additively manufactured, 3-dimensional (3D) custom scaffolds for the regeneration of large volume alveolar bone defects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans of 5 posterior mandibular vertical bone defects were obtained. Surface masks (3D surface contours) of the recipient site were first isolated using a contrast threshold, transformed into 3D objects, and used to guide the formation of custom implant template models. To determine model accuracy and fit, the gap and overlap between the patient geometry models and the idealized template 3D models were quantified. Models were 3D printed from medical grade polycaprolactone (PCL) into porous scaffolds. For scaffold dimensional quantification, scaffolds were scanned using a micro-computed tomography (µCT) scanner.
RESULTS: The design and printing processes each achieved dimensional errors of <200 µm on average. The average gap between the template implant model and the scanned scaffold model was found to be 74 ± 14 µm. The printed scaffold was confirmed as having a porosity of 83.91%, a mean polymer or filament thickness of 200 ± 46 µm, and a mean pore size of 590 ± 243 µm.
CONCLUSION: The approach described in this study is straightforward, adaptable to a range of patient geometries, and results in the formation of reproducible, dimensionally accurate custom implants. These highly porous 3D structures manufactured from resorbable medical grade material represent a potentially transformative technology toward the clinical implementation of scaffold-guided bone regeneration procedures.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; alveolar bone regeneration; biomaterials; custom implant; custom scaffold; polycaprolactone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31957069     DOI: 10.1111/clr.13579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy evaluation of cone beam computed tomography applied to measure peri-implant bone thickness in living patients: an ex vivo and in vivo experiment.

Authors:  Yanhua Lan; Xiaoyuan Huang; Mingxing Fan; Huazhen Yu; Zhijian Xie; Yiqun Zhou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Design of customized soft-tissue substitutes for posterior single-tooth defects: A proof-of-concept in-vitro study.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Tao Yu; Malin Strasding; Xinran Liu; Felix Burkhardt; Birgit Schäfer; Irena Sailer; Dobrila Nesic
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 5.021

3.  Current and future trends in periodontal tissue engineering and bone regeneration.

Authors:  Matthew Galli; Yao Yao; William V Giannobile; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Plast Aesthet Res       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 4.  Recent Advances in Vertical Alveolar Bone Augmentation Using Additive Manufacturing Technologies.

Authors:  Cedryck Vaquette; Joshua Mitchell; Sašo Ivanovski
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-07

Review 5.  Regenerative Medicine Technologies to Treat Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Defects.

Authors:  Jessica M Latimer; Shogo Maekawa; Yao Yao; David T Wu; Michael Chen; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-08-06

6.  Finite element analysis of the performance of additively manufactured scaffolds for scapholunate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Nataliya Perevoshchikova; Kevin M Moerman; Bardiya Akhbari; Randy Bindra; Jayishni N Maharaj; David G Lloyd; Maria Gomez Cerezo; Amelia Carr; Cedryck Vaquette; David J Saxby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Guided bone regeneration using titanium mesh to augment 3-dimensional alveolar defects prior to implant placement. A pilot study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lizio; Gerardo Pellegrino; Giuseppe Corinaldesi; Agnese Ferri; Claudio Marchetti; Pietro Felice
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.021

Review 8.  P4 Medicine as a model for precision periodontal care.

Authors:  P Mark Bartold; Sašo Ivanovski
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 9.  3D Printed and Bioprinted Membranes and Scaffolds for the Periodontal Tissue Regeneration: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Irina-Georgeta Sufaru; Georgiana Macovei; Simona Stoleriu; Maria-Alexandra Martu; Ionut Luchian; Diana-Cristala Kappenberg-Nitescu; Sorina Mihaela Solomon
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.