| Literature DB >> 31956711 |
Fatima Zahra El Hassani1, Abdelali Fadile1, Mouna Faouzi1, Abdelah Zinedine1, Mohamed Merzouki1, Mohamed Benlemlih1.
Abstract
This study investigates the performance of soil and OMW microfloras in OMW organic matter humification in soil. In order to highlight the role of OMW and soil microfloras in the processes of OMW organic matter humification, either OMW or soil was sterilized with autoclaving. The study was carried out in microcosms of 1l containing 500 g of raw or sterilized soil, to which was added 200 ml of raw or sterilized OMW. After 24 months of incubation, the amount of phenolic compounds in the different microcosms was statistically indifferent compared to the control. However, TG-DTA and FTIR analysis of soil humic acids showed that recalcitrant OMW phenolic compounds remain in soil humus in the microcosm: sterilized OMW + raw soil, even after 24 months. Results show that humic acids detected in presence of OMW microflora are loaded with proteins and carbonated compounds and deprived of phenolic compounds and aliphatics with long chain, while humic acids detected in absence of OMW microflora are loaded with phenolic compounds.Entities:
Keywords: Agricultural science; Chemistry; Environmental science; FTIR; Food science; Olive mill wastewater; Phenolic compounds; Soil humic acids; TG/DTA
Year: 2020 PMID: 31956711 PMCID: PMC6956764 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03181
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Dosage of phenolic compounds (mg/g of dry soil) in microcosms. Symbols *, ** refer to statistical comparison at a probability level of 0.05.
| Control (Distilled water + raw soil) | Raw OMW + raw soil | Raw OMW + sterilized soil | Sterilized OMW + raw soil | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 day | 0,07 ± 0,03 * | 2,68 ± 0,15 ** | _ | _ |
| 40 days | 0,04 ± 0,01 * | 0,12 ± 0,01 ** | 0,13 ± 0,02 ** | 0,13 ± 0,03 ** |
| 6 months | 0,09 ± 0,01 * | 0,67 ± 0,08 ** | 0,37 ± 0,03 ** | 0,52 ± 0,05 ** |
| 7 months | 0,08 ± 0,02 * | 0,64 ± 0,06 ** | 0,36 ± 0,04 ** | 0,51 ± 0,02 ** |
| 12 months | 0,12 ± 0,02 * | 0,24 ± 0,05 ** | 0,21 ± 0,07 * | 0,24 ± 0,03 ** |
| 24 months | 0,13 ± 0,03 * | 0,17 ± 0,04 * | 0,15 ± 0,04 * | 0,19 ± 0,06 * |
Figure 1TG-DTA analysis of humic acids of the different microcosms: control (A), raw OMW + raw soil (B), raw OMW + sterilized soil (C), sterilized OMW + raw soil (D).
Attributions of absorbance bands in FTIR spectra (Boukir et al., 2001; Hafidi et al., 2005).
| Bands and peaks (cm−1) | Attribution |
|---|---|
| 3600–3100 | Linked OH (ν) (alcohols, phenols, carboxylic acids) |
| 3100–3000 | CH (ν) (aromatics) |
| 3000–2800 | CH, CH2, CH3 (ν) (aliphatics) |
| 1742–1725 | C=O (ν) (carboxylic acids, ketones, esters, amides) |
| 1650–1630 | C=C (ν) (aromatics) |
| 1400 | OH (δ) (phenols), COO−, CH3 |
| 1200–1100 | C–O, OH, C–O–H (γ) (carbohydrates, alcools, aromatics, ethers, Si–O–C groups) |
| 485–1000 | C–Cl, C–Br, C–I (halogenures) |
Figure 2FTIR analysis of humic acids of the different microcosms: control (A), raw OMW + raw soil (B), raw OMW + sterilized soil (C), sterilized OMW + raw soil (D).
Major exothermic pics of thermogravimetric analysis (TG) and differential thermic analysis (DTA) of soil humic acids after 24 months of microcosms' incubation.
| 1° exo. peak | 2° exo. peak | 3° exo. peak | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tmax (°C) | Mass loss (%) | Tmax (°C) | Mass loss (%) | Tmax (°C) | Mass loss (%) | |
| Control | _ | _ | 330 | 19,90 | 438 | 9,10 |
| Raw OMW + raw soil | 218 | 6,12 | 319 | 3,67 | _ | _ |
| Raw OMW + sterilized soil | 223 | 6,59 | 309 | 7,03 | _ | _ |
| Sterilized OMW + raw soil | _ | _ | 321 | 23,10 | 435 | 8,02 |