| Literature DB >> 31956554 |
Sameh S Ali1,2, Nessma A El-Zawawy2, Rania Al-Tohamy1, Shimaa El-Sapagh2, Ahmed M Mustafa3,4, Jianzhong Sun1.
Abstract
The Multidrug Drug Resistance (MDR) and Pan-Drug Resistance (PDR) remain an intractable challenge issue in public health, worldwide. Plant extracts-based biological macromolecules containing a diverse array of secondary metabolites could be potentially used as alternative approaches to control or limit MDR/PDR infections. Plants of the Solanaceae family exhibit a wide variety of secondary metabolites with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, which render them a significant role in food and pharmaceutical applications. To our knowledge, this is the first report on phytochemical constituents, antioxidant, antimicrobial activities and in vivo toxicological safety of Lycium shawii leaf extracts. Results revealed that phenolics and flavonoids were found to be the most abundant compounds in all extracts. Antioxidant activity of extracts was measured using DPPH• and ABTS•+ assays and the methanol extract displayed superior scavenging activity (IC50 = 0.06 and 0.007 mg/mL for DPPH• and ABTS•+, respectively). Results of the GC-MS analysis revealed the identity of 10 compounds. Moreover, in vivo toxicological assessment can confirm the safety of L. shawii for use. Overall, L. shawii leaves are a promising natural source for the development of novel antimicrobial and antioxidant agents that could potentially combat clinical MDR/PDR pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus niger; Candida albicans; Herbal medicine; Pharmaceutical applications; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Staphylococcus aureus
Year: 2019 PMID: 31956554 PMCID: PMC6957848 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2019.01.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tradit Complement Med ISSN: 2225-4110
Ethnobotanical value of Lycium shawii used in this study.
| Botanical name | Arabic name | Family | Habit | Habitat | Distribution | Medicinal uses | Other uses | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awsaj | Solanaceae | Shrub | Sandy and silty depressions, runnels, wadis and on rocky slopes | Recorded in Egypt, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and UAE | A diuretic, laxative and tonic agent | Grazed by animals and the berries are eaten by man; the leaves provide browsing for camels |
Screening of phytochemical constituents of L. shawii leaf extracts.
| Phytochemical constituents | Solvent extract | Test or reagent used | Observed color | Uses | Mechanism of action | References | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aqueous | Methanol | Ethanol | Ethyl acetate | ||||||
| Alkaloids | ND | + | ND | Wagner | Pale yellow | Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, analgesic | Intercalate into DNA and uncouple respiration | ||
| Flavonoids | + | + | AlCl3 | Yellow | Antimicrobial, diuretic | Metal chelating, cell wall complexation, adhesion binding | |||
| Phenolics | + | + | + | AlCl3 | Yellow | Antimicrobial, wound dressing | Membrane infraction | ||
| Tannins | ND | + | + | Braemers | Dark blue | Antimicrobial, wound dressing, anti-inflammatory, preventing ulcer development | Enzyme inactivation, cell wall complexation, adhesion binding, membrane disruption, substrate deprivation | ||
| Saponins | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | – | – | ||
| Glycosides | ND | + | ND | + | H2SO4 | Dark brown | Lower blood pressure | NA | |
| Terpenoids | ND | + | + | + | Salkowaski | Red | Antimicrobial | Membrane disruption, prohibition of ATase actuality | |
| Steroids | ND | + | + | ND | Salkowaski | Red | Antihypertensive effect on blood pressure, serum analysis of hypertensive patient | NA | |
| Coumarins | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | – | – | ||
ND, Not Detected; NA, Not Available; +, present; -, absent; AlCl, aluminum trichloride; HSO, sulfuric acid.
Total Phenolic Content (TPC) and Total Flavonoid Content (TFC) of the solvent extract from L. shawii leaves.
| Assay | Solvent extract | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aqueous | Methanol | Ethanol | Ethyl acetate | ||
| TFC (mg QE/g extract)I | 95.93 ± 0.64a | 90.57 ± 0.31b | 41.47 ± 0.51c | 52.43 ± 0.98d | < 0.001* |
| TPC (mg GAE/g extract)II | 55.50 ± 1.18a | 230.50 ± 0.50b | 99.93 ± 0.83c | 190.60 ± 0.40d | < 0.001* |
Different superscript letters in the same row indicate significant difference (P ≤ 0.05); QE, Quercetin Equivalent; GAE, Gallic Acid Equivalent.
Fig. 1Effect of different concentrations of L. shawi leaf extracts in free radical-scavenging activities: (A) DPPH• assay and (B) ABTS•+ assay. GSH: glutathione; GSH and Trolox are positive controls; ME, Methanol; EA, Ethyl Acetate; ET, Ethanol; AQ, Aqueous.
DPPH• and ABTS•+ scavenging activities of leaf extracts from the L. shawii.
| Radical scavenging activity | Solvent extract | Positive control | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aqueous | Methanol | Ethanol | Ethyl acetate | GSH | Trolox | ||
| DPPH• | IC50 (mgmL−1) | 0.7 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.07 | 0.005 | ND |
| 1/IC50 | 1.4 | 16.7 | 10.0 | 14.3 | 200 | ND | |
| ABTS•+ | IC50 (mgmL−1) | 0.15 | 0.007 | 0.075 | 0.015 | ND | 0.0025 |
| 1/IC50 | 6.6 | 142.8 | 13.3 | 66.7 | ND | 400 | |
ND: Not Detected; IC: Inhibitory Concentration; IC, the concentration required to inhibit 50% of radical.
Fig. 2Correlation coefficients graphs (R-values) between antioxidant activities (1/IC50) and TPC (A&C) and TFC (B&D) using DPPH• assay (A&B) and ABTS•+ assay (C&D). QE, Quercetin Equivalent; GAE, Gallic Acid Equivalent.
Antimicrobial activity of four extracts from L. shawii leaves.
| Strain number | Extract | DIZ (mm) | MIC (μgmL−1) | MBC (μgmL−1) | MFC (μgmL−1) | DRPs | Resistance type | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration of | ||||||||||||
| 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | ||||||||
| PA-09 | ANOVA | AQ | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 10.5 ± 0.1 | 13.7 ± 0.1 | 15.5 ± 0.1 | 15.9 ± 0.06 | 32 | 64 | ND | AX, CAZ, FEP, ATM, CRO, IPM, CIP, SXT, C, CN, TOB, K, CT | MDR |
| ME | 10.5 ± 0.1 | 14.6 ± 0.1 | 20.1 ± 0.1 | 25.3 ± 0.06 | 28.3 ± 0.1 | 4 | 8 | ND | ||||
| ET | 8.7 ± 0.06 | 11.9 ± 0.1 | 14.7 ± 0.06 | 18.5 ± 0.06 | 20.00 ± 0.00 | 8 | 16 | ND | ||||
| EA | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 9.3 ± 0.06 | 13.03 ± 0.06 | 16.9 ± 0.06 | 22.8 ± 0.15 | 16 | 32 | ND | ||||
| F | 22353.867 | 1888.800 | 4667.458 | 6725.733 | 8039.639 | |||||||
| *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | ||||||||
| SA-17 | ANOVA | AQ | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 9.3 ± 0.06 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 16.1 ± 0.06 | 19.3 ± 0.1 | 16 | 32 | ND | AX, PIP, AMC, TZP, CTX, CRO, FEP, CFP, IMP, ATM, NA, CIP, CN, AK, K, SXT, TE, C, VA | PDR |
| ME | 13.2 ± 0.06 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 23.5 ± 0.06 | 30.3 ± 0.1 | 34.9 ± 0.06 | 2 | 4 | ND | ||||
| ET | 8.03 ± 0.06 | 10.6 ± 0.1 | 13.8 ± 0.1 | 19.0 ± 0.0 | 22.1 ± 0.1 | 8 | 16 | ND | ||||
| EA | 7.9 ± 0.06 | 11.03 ± 0.06 | 15.4 ± 0.1 | 19.7 ± 0.06 | 23.03 ± 0.06 | 8 | 16 | ND | ||||
| F | 35458.222 | 11079.133 | 8399.848 | 15564.296 | 13282.333 | |||||||
| *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | ||||||||
| CA-11 | ANOVA | AQ | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 10.03 ± 0.06 | 12.5 ± 0.06 | 15.0 ± 0.0 | 16 | ND | 64 | AMB, ITC, CLT, MIZ, FLC, MCFG, NYT, TRB | PDR |
| ME | 8.03 ± 0.06 | 15.03 ± 0.06 | 28.4 ± 0.06 | 40.00 ± 0.0 | 50.8 ± 0.06 | 4 | ND | 8 | ||||
| ET | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 9.1 ± 0.06 | 15.2 ± 0.06 | 21.5 ± 0.06 | 24.7 ± 0.1 | 8 | ND | 8 | ||||
| EA | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 11.00 ± 0.00 | 18.23 ± 0.06 | 22.77 ± 0.12 | 8 | ND | 16 | ||||
| F | 58081.000 | 48962.000 | 86313.222 | 169443.889 | 109232.458 | |||||||
| *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | ||||||||
| AN-05 | ANOVA | AQ | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 9.2 ± 0.2 | 10.6 ± 0.1 | 32 | ND | 64 | AMB, ITC, CLT, MIZ, FLC, TRB | MDR |
| ME | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 22.1 ± 0.1 | 36.7 ± 0.06 | 49.4 ± 0.1 | 54.0 ± 0.0 | 8 | ND | 16 | ||||
| ET | 8.0 ± 0.0 | 22.2 ± 19.05 | 20.0 ± 0.0 | 32.03 ± 0.06 | 34.1 ± 0.06 | 16 | ND | 16 | ||||
| EA | 8.03 ± 0.06 | 11.6 ± 0.1 | 24.6 ± 0.2 | 35.8 ± 0.1 | 39.5 ± 0.06 | 16 | ND | 32 | ||||
| F | 70921.000 | 3.690 | 84086.400 | 32355.226 | 195569.944 | |||||||
| *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | *0.00 | ||||||||
PA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; SA, Staphylococcus aureus; CA, Candida albicans; AN: Aspergillus niger; AQ, Aqueous; ME, Methanol; ET, Ethanol; EA, Ethyl Acetate; MIC, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration; MBC, Minimum Bactericidal Concentration; MFC, Minimum Fungicidal Concentration; DRPs, Drug-Resistance Patterns; MDR, Multi-Drug Resistance; PDR, Pan-Drug Resistance; AX, amoxicillin; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; ATM, aztreonam, CRO, ceftriaxone; IMP, imipenem; CIP, ciprofloxacin; SXT, cotrimoxazole; C, chloramphenicol; CN, gentamicin; TOB, tobramycin; K, kanamycin; CT, colistin sulfate; PIP, piperacillin; AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; TZP, pipracillin/tazobactam; CTX, cefotaxime; CFP, cefoperazone; NA, nalidixic acid; AK, amikacin; TE, tetracycline; VA, vancomycin; AMB, amphotericin; FLC, fluconazole; ITC, itraconazole; CLT, clotrimazole; MIZ, miconazole; MCFG, micfungin; NYT, nystatin; TRB, terbinafine; ND, Not Detected; ∗P-value ≤ 0.05 is significant.
Fig. 3TEM images of PA-09 strain (B) and SA-17 strain (D) treated with methanol extract of L. shawii leaves. Control cells (A&C). Arrows indicate the location of the Cytoplasmic Membrane (CM), Outer Membrane (OM), Periplasmic space and Peptidoglycan (P) and Cell Wall (W). PA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; SA, Staphylococcus aureus.
Fig. 4TEM images of AN-05 strain (B) and CA-11 strain (D) treated with methanol extract of L. shawii leaves. Control cells (A&C). AN, Aspergillus niger; CA, Candida albicans.
Phytochemical compounds, retention time (RT), and biological uses of the L. shawii methanol extract using GC-MS.
| ID | RT (min) | Peak area (%) | Compound name | Molecular formula | Molecular weight | Compound nature | Uses | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.203 | 32.49 | P-coumaric acid (4-hydroxycinnamic acid) | C9H8O3 | 164.16 | Phenolic | Antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antiviral, anti-cancer, anxiolytic, antiplatelet aggregation, antipyretic, anti-diabetic and anti-arthritis activities | |
| 2 | 6.261 | 20.18 | Apigenin (4,5,6-trihydroxy flavone) | C15H10O5 | 270.24 | Flavonoid | Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic effects | |
| 3 | 6.460 | 0.474 | Hexane (n-hexane) | C6H14 | 86.178 | Alkane | Food preservative, degreaser, denaturing agent in some alcoholic preparation, perfume preparation, pharmaceutical industry and wound dressing | |
| 4 | 9.481 | 5.73 | Catechol (1,2-dihydroxy benzene) | C6H6O2 | 110.1 | Phenolic | Antioxidant, synthesis of dyes, rubber, plastics, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics | |
| 5 | 12.115 | 5.37 | Hexanol (1-hexanol) | C6H14O | 102.174 | Alcoholic | Perfume preparation | |
| 6 | 14.047 | 5.38 | Oxalic acid isobutyl pentyl ester (2-methylpropyl pentyl ethanedioate) | C11H20O4 | 216.277 | Ester | Antimicrobial | |
| 7 | 16.081 | 5.72 | Di- | C24H38O4 | 390.564 | Ester | Anti-cancer, plastic industry, pesticides and cosmetics | |
| 8 | 22.911 | 2.56 | Phthalic acid butyl undecyl ester (phthalic acid 1- butyl 2-undecyl ester) | C23H36O4 | 376.537 | Ester | Antimicrobial | |
| 9 | 22.222 | 2.58 | Pantolactone (DL-pantoyl lactone) | C6H10O3 | 130.14 | Oxolanes | Cosmetics | |
| 10 | 33.101 | 19.4 | Fisetin (5-desoxyquercetin) | C15H10O6 | 286.236 | Flavonoid | Anti-carcinogenic, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory |
Fig. 5Chromatogram of P-coumaric acid standard (A) and that of the L. shawii methanol extract (B).
Fig. 6In vivo toxicity assessment of methanol extract from L. shawii leaves in male and female groups of albino rats after acute oral administration; average weight of rats in the treated groups were compared with that of the respective control group (P ≤ 0.05) (A). Effect of methanol extract of L. shawii leaves on haemolytic activities; Triton X-100 is a positive control (B).