Literature DB >> 31956516

Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain after Tarlov cyst surgery in a 66-year-old woman: A case report.

Jamal Hasoon1, Amnon A Berger1, Ivan Urits1, Vwaire Orhurhu2, Omar Viswanath3,4,5, Musa Aner1.   

Abstract

Tarlov cysts are extradural meningeal cysts with collections of cerebrospinal fluid within the nerve sheath. These cysts are uncommon but tend to present more often in women. Symptomatic Tarlov cysts can lead to a variety of neurologic symptoms and painful conditions, including chronic pelvic pain. There is no consensus regarding the best treatment for symptomatic cysts. Surgical management has high rates of complication, including chronic pain, but better long-term results for symptom and cyst resolution. We describe a patient who developed worsening pelvic pain and lumbar radiculopathy after surgical management of her Tarlov cysts. Medication failed to relieve the pain, as did a variety of other procedures, before the patient ultimately received significant pain relief from high-frequency spinal cord stimulation. This case may provide guidance for physicians when managing patients suffering from symptomatic Tarlov cysts, or worsening pain symptoms after surgical management of these cysts.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; Pelvic pain; Spinal cord stimulator; Tarlov cyst

Year:  2020        PMID: 31956516      PMCID: PMC6962650          DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health        ISSN: 2214-9112


Introduction

Tarlov cysts are perineural fluid-filled sacs that are usually found in the lumbosacral spine around the junction of peripheral nerve roots and the respective dorsal root ganglia. The cysts are extradural meningeal cysts with collections of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within the nerve root sheath [1]. Tarlov cysts are found in roughly 1%–5% of the general population. [2,3]. Interestingly, some studies have demonstrated that women account for 59%–70% of cases [2,4]. Symptomatic Tarlov cysts are rare but can sometimes grow in size and compress adjacent nerve root structures, leading to localized or radicular pain, bowel and bladder symptoms, or other neurological sequelae. The most common presenting symptoms are back pain, pelvic pain, perineal pain, lumbar radiculopathy, or bowel/bladder symptoms. These are generally exacerbated by maneuvers that raise the CSF pressure such as standing, coughing, sneezing, or straining to void or defecate. Diagnosis is generally done with imaging and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice. Tarlov cysts were first described by Tarlov in 1938 as an incidental finding during an autopsy [5]. Since then a variety of surgical and non-surgical interventions have been described for the treatment of Tarlov cysts. Unfortunately, there is a high rate of complications associated with surgical treatment of these cysts including hemorrhage, neurological deficit, CSF leak, infection, chronic pain, and cyst recurrence. A systematic review of surgical and non-surgical management of Tarlov cysts demonstrated a 21% and 12.47% complication rate respectively. There was a higher rate of transient sciatica, CSF-related complications, and bladder/bowel complications. Interestingly, both groups reported symptomatic improvement in 83.5% of patients. Transient exacerbation of symptoms and cyst recurrence was noted to be higher in non-surgically managed groups, suggesting surgical management is associated with higher postprocedural complication rates but better long-term efficacy for symptoms and cyst resolution [6]. Given the rarity of the condition and the high complication rates associated with surgical management, there is currently no consensus regarding the best treatment for patients who are symptomatic. We describe a patient who had a longstanding history of chronic pelvic pain secondary to multiple sacral Tarlov cysts. She underwent surgery for her condition, but it worsened her symptoms and the patient ultimately obtained relief with the use of a high-frequency spinal cord stimulator (SCS).

Case Description

The patient was a 66-year-old woman with a longstanding history of chronic pelvic pain secondary to multiple large Tarlov cysts affecting the S1-S4 nerve roots. She had attempted medication management with acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and neuropathic pain medications. She had also undergone a series of epidural steroid injections and a trial of superior hypogastric plexus blocks but obtain minimal relief with these. She ultimately had surgery for the removal of the Tarlov cysts as well as sacral lamina reconstruction (Fig. 1). However, the patient's surgery resulted in worsening of her chronic pelvic pain, and also produced new-onset back pain and lumbar radiculopathy down both legs. The patient reported constant debilitating back and pelvic pain with intermittent stabbing and burning pain in her legs. Her worsening symptoms were uncontrolled with continued medication management as well as a repeat series of epidural steroid injections.
Fig. 1

Lumbosacral MRI demonstrating post-surgical changes after the patient's initial surgery.

Lumbosacral MRI demonstrating post-surgical changes after the patient's initial surgery. Given that the patient's worsening symptoms were unrelieved with both medication management and interventional pain procedures, we tried high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for her worsening pain and new-onset radiculopathy. The patient was counseled regarding the risks and benefits of the procedure and elected to proceed. A spinal cord stimulator lead was introduced into the epidural space and advanced to the superior endplate of T8. A second lead was placed at the superior endplate of T9 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Fluoroscopic imaging demonstrating SCS lead placement in the posterior epidural space at the superior levels of T8 and T9.

Fluoroscopic imaging demonstrating SCS lead placement in the posterior epidural space at the superior levels of T8 and T9. The patient presented for follow-up after the procedure and reported significant improvement in her symptoms. She noted that the use of SCS had resulted in a 90% improvement of her back pain, a 95% improvement in her pelvic pain, and >50% improvement in her radiculopathy. Additionally, she reported she was much more active and was able to decrease her medication use with the pain relief she obtained from spinal cord stimulation.

Discussion

Tarlov cysts can be a challenging condition to recognize and diagnose given the rarity of the condition. Although these cysts most commonly affect the sacral nerve roots, they have been found in lumbar, thoracic, and cervical regions as well. The condition is generally asymptomatic. However, a small percentage of patients may demonstrate symptoms related to nerve root compression. Tarlov cysts tend to expand over time and can cause nerve root irritation, leading to pain or other neurological disturbances. There is no consensus on the optimal management of symptomatic Tarlov cysts. Percutaneous cyst drainage is a nonsurgical intervention has been used to treat this condition [3]. This treatment is only temporary though, as cysts tend to gradually reform and symptoms recur. In addition to percutaneous drainage, one study has demonstrated that cyst aspiration with the placement of fibrin glue can prevent recurrence of the cysts. However, these patients are also at significant risk for postprocedural aseptic meningitis [7]. Surgical treatment of symptomatic cysts varies and can involve complete cyst removal with excision of the affected posterior root and ganglion, decompressive laminectomy, cyst wall resection, and cyst fenestration [[8], [9], [10], [11]]. The success and complication rates vary greatly by procedure. Again, there is no consensus regarding when surgical management for Tarlov cysts is warranted, though one study suggested that cysts larger than 1.5 cm with associated radicular pain or bowel/bladder dysfunction may benefit the most from surgical intervention [10]. We recommend that patients presenting with symptomatic Tarlov cysts diagnosed by imaging should initially undergo conservative management with medication management, including acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and neuropathic pain medications such as gabapentin. Additionally, patients may respond to interventional pain procedures such as epidural steroid injections. Surgery should be reserved for patients who fail conservative management, given the high complication rates. We would also like to comment on the success of spinal cord stimulation in this patient. SCS has been proven to be effective for treating intractable neuropathic pain such as lumbar radiculopathy and post-laminectomy syndrome [[12], [13], [14]]. There is also growing evidence that SCS can even be helpful for treating debilitating chronic visceral pelvic pain [15]. We believe this case is of importance as it describes the complicated management of patients with symptomatic Tarlov cysts who ultimately fail to respond to conservative therapy. We also describe the use of SCS in this patient and the benefit it can provide for patients who are suffering from severe radiculopathy after surgery as well as those with chronic pelvic pain (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

An example of an implantable high-frequency spinal cord stimulator system showing the percutaneous leads and implantable pulse generator.

An example of an implantable high-frequency spinal cord stimulator system showing the percutaneous leads and implantable pulse generator.

Conclusion

Tarlov cysts are an uncommon condition that present more often in women. This condition rarely becomes symptomatic, producing a variety of neurologic symptoms and painful conditions. Given the rarity of the condition and the high complication rates associated with surgery, there is no clear treatment algorithm for symptomatic patients. These cysts can be managed conservatively or surgically; surgical management has higher complication rates but better long-term results for symptom and cyst resolution. Patients who develop new or worsening pain after Tarlov cyst surgery may benefit from spinal cord stimulation. This case may provide guidance for physicians managing patients suffering from symptomatic Tarlov cysts, or worsening pain symptoms after surgical management of these cysts.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Restoring Successful Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy for a Patient with Severe Pocket Pain Utilizing Nalu Micro-Implantable Pulse Generator.

Authors:  Jamal Hasoon; Ivan Urits; Syed Mahmood; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Non-Surgical Refractory Back Pain: A Case Report.

Authors:  Suhani Dalal; Ahish Chitneni; Syed Mahmood; Alan Kaye; Jamal Hasoon
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-02-14

3.  10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Combined Alleviation of Post-Laminectomy Syndrome and Chronic Abdominal Pain: A Case Report.

Authors:  Amnon A Berger; Jamal Hasoon; Ivan Urits; Omar Viswanath; Jatinder Gill
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Dural Puncture During Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Insertion: Analysis of Practice Patterns.

Authors:  Warren A Southerland; Jamal Hasoon; Ivan Urits; Omar Viswanath; Thomas T Simopoulos; Farnad Imani; Hakimeh Karimi-Aliabadi; Musa M Aner; Lynn Kohan; Jatinder Gill
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-05-11

5.  Improved Pain Control with Combination Spinal Cord Stimulator Therapy Utilizing Sub-perception and Traditional Paresthesia Based Waveforms: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Amnon A Berger; Ivan Urits; Jamal Hasoon; Jatinder Gill; Musa Aner; Cyrus A Yazdi; Omar Viswanath; Elyse M Cornett; Alan David Kaye; Farnad Imani; Farsad Imani; Giustino Varrassi; Thomas T Simopoulos
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-02-22

Review 6.  Efficacy of Dry Needling and Acupuncture in the Treatment of Neck Pain.

Authors:  Amnon A Berger; Yao Liu; Luke Mosel; Kristin A Champagne; Miriam T Ruoff; Elyse M Cornett; Alan David Kaye; Farnad Imani; Asadollah Shakeri; Giustino Varrassi; Omar Viswanath; Ivan Urits
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-04-03

Review 7.  Efficacy of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Chronic Abdominal Pain.

Authors:  Amnon A Berger; Yao Liu; Kevin Jin; Alicia Kaneb; Alexandra Welschmeyer; Elyse M Cornett; Alan David Kaye; Farnad Imani; Seyed-Hosein Khademi; Giustino Varrassi; Omar Viswanath; Ivan Urits
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-03-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.