Literature DB >> 31955686

A survey of algorithms for transforming molecular dynamics data into metadata for in situ analytics based on machine learning methods.

Michela Taufer1, Trilce Estrada2, Travis Johnston3.   

Abstract

This paper presents the survey of three algorithms to transform atomic-level molecular snapshots from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations into metadata representations that are suitable for in situ analytics based on machine learning methods. MD simulations studying the classical time evolution of a molecular system at atomic resolution are widely recognized in the fields of chemistry, material sciences, molecular biology and drug design; these simulations are one of the most common simulations on supercomputers. Next-generation supercomputers will have a dramatically higher performance than current systems, generating more data that needs to be analysed (e.g. in terms of number and length of MD trajectories). In the future, the coordination of data generation and analysis can no longer rely on manual, centralized analysis traditionally performed after the simulation is completed or on current data representations that have been defined for traditional visualization tools. Powerful data preparation phases (i.e. phases in which original row data is transformed to concise and still meaningful representations) will need to proceed data analysis phases. Here, we discuss three algorithms for transforming traditionally used molecular representations into concise and meaningful metadata representations. The transformations can be performed locally. The new metadata can be fed into machine learning methods for runtime in situ analysis of larger MD trajectories supported by high-performance computing. In this paper, we provide an overview of the three algorithms and their use for three different applications: protein-ligand docking in drug design; protein folding simulations; and protein engineering based on analytics of protein functions depending on proteins' three-dimensional structures. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Numerical algorithms for high-performance computational science'.

Keywords:  MapReduce; machine learning; protein engineering; protein folding; protein–ligand docking

Year:  2020        PMID: 31955686      PMCID: PMC7015296          DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  10 in total

1.  Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations.

Authors:  G N RAMACHANDRAN; C RAMAKRISHNAN; V SASISEKHARAN
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A scalable and accurate method for classifying protein-ligand binding geometries using a MapReduce approach.

Authors:  T Estrada; B Zhang; P Cicotti; R S Armen; M Taufer
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; Rosemary Braun; Wei Wang; James Gumbart; Emad Tajkhorshid; Elizabeth Villa; Christophe Chipot; Robert D Skeel; Laxmikant Kalé; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs.

Authors:  David A Case; Thomas E Cheatham; Tom Darden; Holger Gohlke; Ray Luo; Kenneth M Merz; Alexey Onufriev; Carlos Simmerling; Bing Wang; Robert J Woods
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Bias, reporting, and sharing: computational evaluations of docking methods.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Computational multiscale modeling in protein--ligand docking.

Authors:  Michela Taufer; Roger Armen; Jianhan Chen; Patricia Teller; Charles Brooks
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

Review 8.  Molecular dynamics simulations of large macromolecular complexes.

Authors:  Juan R Perilla; Boon Chong Goh; C Keith Cassidy; Bo Liu; Rafael C Bernardi; Till Rudack; Hang Yu; Zhe Wu; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  In situ data analytics and indexing of protein trajectories.

Authors:  Travis Johnston; Boyu Zhang; Adam Liwo; Silvia Crivelli; Michela Taufer
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  A Graphic Encoding Method for Quantitative Classification of Protein Structure and Representation of Conformational Changes.

Authors:  Hector Carrillo-Cabada; Jeremy Benson; Asghar M Razavi; Brianna Mulligan; Michel A Cuendet; Harel Weinstein; Michela Taufer; Trilce Estrada
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.702

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  High frequency accuracy and loss data of random neural networks trained on image datasets.

Authors:  Ariel Keller Rorabaugh; Silvina Caíno-Lores; Travis Johnston; Michela Taufer
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2022-01-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.