Laurindo Ferreira da Rocha Junior1, Angela Luzia Branco Pinto Duarte2, Moacyr Jesus Barreto de Melo Rêgo3, Anderson Rodrigues de Almeida4, Kamila de Melo Vilar5, Hugo Deleon de Lima6, Andréa Tavares Dantas7, Henrique de Ataíde Mariz8, Ivan da Rocha Pitta9, Maira Galdino da Rocha Pitta10. 1. Laboratório de Imunomodulação e Novas Abordagens Terapêuticas, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Inovação Terapêutica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil; Departamento de Reumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. Electronic address: laurindorochajr@gmail.com. 2. Laboratório de Imunomodulação e Novas Abordagens Terapêuticas, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Inovação Terapêutica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil; Departamento de Reumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. Electronic address: angelalbpduarte@gmail.com. 3. Laboratório de Imunomodulação e Novas Abordagens Terapêuticas, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Inovação Terapêutica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. Electronic address: moacyr.rego@gmail.com. 4. Laboratório de Imunomodulação e Novas Abordagens Terapêuticas, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Inovação Terapêutica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. Electronic address: andersonr.almeida@hotmail.com. 5. Laboratório de Imunomodulação e Novas Abordagens Terapêuticas, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Inovação Terapêutica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. Electronic address: kamilamelo_vilar@hotmail.com. 6. Laboratório de Imunomodulação e Novas Abordagens Terapêuticas, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Inovação Terapêutica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. Electronic address: hugodeleondelima@gmail.com. 7. Laboratório de Imunomodulação e Novas Abordagens Terapêuticas, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Inovação Terapêutica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil; Departamento de Reumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. Electronic address: andreatdantas@gmail.com. 8. Laboratório de Imunomodulação e Novas Abordagens Terapêuticas, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Inovação Terapêutica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil; Departamento de Reumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. Electronic address: henriqueamariz@yahoo.com.br. 9. Laboratório de Imunomodulação e Novas Abordagens Terapêuticas, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Inovação Terapêutica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. Electronic address: irpitta@gmail.com. 10. Laboratório de Imunomodulação e Novas Abordagens Terapêuticas, Núcleo de Pesquisa em Inovação Terapêutica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife-PE, Brazil. Electronic address: mgrpitta@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by chronic and progressive inflammation that can cause a high degree of disability in affected individuals. Proinflammatory cytokines play central roles in the development of degradative and inflammatory responses in RA. IL-29 has been identified in RA and reported as a biomarker of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To analyze serum levels and accuracy of IL-29 in RA patients compared to healthy subjects and patients with other rheumatic diseases. METHODS: IL-29 serum levels were measured in 121 patients with RA, 53 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 60 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), 29 patients with fibromyalgia (FM), 50 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and 68 healthy individuals as controls. IL-29 levels in serum were investigated by ELISA. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LR) for having RA were calculated. RESULTS: Serum levels of IL-29 were increased in RA patients 113.6 (IQR = 31.25-308.5) pg/ml compared to non-RA patients (SLE, SSc, OA, and FM) (31.25 pg/ml) and healthy controls (31.25 pg/ml, p < 0.001). The IL-29 cut-off values to distinguish patients with RA from non-RA patients were 61.11 pg/ml (sensitivity 57.02, specificity 92.71, LR: 7.82) and for all subjects 32.96 pg/ml (sensitivity 64.46, specificity 87.31, LR: 5.08). Additionally, IL-29 correlated negatively with age (r=-0189, p = 0.038) and disease duration (-0.192, p = 0.037). Interestingly, IL-29 correlated positively with neutrophil count in RA patients positive for rheumatoid factor (r = 0.259, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: IL-29 is higher in the serum of patients with RA compared to non-RA subjects and may have potential for use as a biological marker.
BACKGROUND:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by chronic and progressive inflammation that can cause a high degree of disability in affected individuals. Proinflammatory cytokines play central roles in the development of degradative and inflammatory responses in RA. IL-29 has been identified in RA and reported as a biomarker of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To analyze serum levels and accuracy of IL-29 in RApatients compared to healthy subjects and patients with other rheumatic diseases. METHODS:IL-29 serum levels were measured in 121 patients with RA, 53 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 60 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), 29 patients with fibromyalgia (FM), 50 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and 68 healthy individuals as controls. IL-29 levels in serum were investigated by ELISA. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LR) for having RA were calculated. RESULTS: Serum levels of IL-29 were increased in RApatients 113.6 (IQR = 31.25-308.5) pg/ml compared to non-RApatients (SLE, SSc, OA, and FM) (31.25 pg/ml) and healthy controls (31.25 pg/ml, p < 0.001). The IL-29 cut-off values to distinguish patients with RA from non-RApatients were 61.11 pg/ml (sensitivity 57.02, specificity 92.71, LR: 7.82) and for all subjects 32.96 pg/ml (sensitivity 64.46, specificity 87.31, LR: 5.08). Additionally, IL-29 correlated negatively with age (r=-0189, p = 0.038) and disease duration (-0.192, p = 0.037). Interestingly, IL-29 correlated positively with neutrophil count in RApatients positive for rheumatoid factor (r = 0.259, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION:IL-29 is higher in the serum of patients with RA compared to non-RA subjects and may have potential for use as a biological marker.