Literature DB >> 31954583

Genomic prediction of residual feed intake in US Holstein dairy cattle.

B Li1, P M VanRaden1, E Guduk2, J R O'Connell3, D J Null1, E E Connor1, M J VandeHaar4, R J Tempelman4, K A Weigel5, J B Cole6.   

Abstract

Genomic selection is an important tool to introduce feed efficiency into dairy cattle breeding. The goals of the current research are to estimate genomic breeding values of residual feed intake (RFI) and to assess the prediction reliability for RFI in the US Holstein population. The RFI data were collected from 4,823 lactations of 3,947 Holstein cows in 9 research herds in the United States, and were pre-adjusted to remove phenotypic correlations with milk energy, metabolic body weight, body weight change, and for several environmental effects. In the current analyses, genomic predicted transmitting abilities of milk energy and of body weight composite were included into the RFI model to further remove the genetic correlations that remained between RFI and these energy sinks. In the first part of the analyses, a national genomic evaluation for RFI was conducted for all the Holsteins in the national database using a standard multi-step genomic evaluation method and 60,671 SNP list. In the second part of the study, a single-step genomic prediction method was applied to estimate genomic breeding values of RFI for all cows with phenotypes, 5,252 elite young bulls, 4,029 young heifers, as well as their ancestors in the pedigree, using a high-density genotype chip. Theoretical prediction reliabilities were calculated for all the studied animals in the single-step genomic prediction by direct inversion of the mixed model equations. In the results, breeding values were estimated for 1.6 million genotyped Holsteins and 60 million ungenotyped Holsteins, The genomic predicted transmitting ability correlations between RFI and other traits in the index (e.g., fertility) are generally low, indicating minor correlated responses on other index traits when selecting for RFI. Genomic prediction reliabilities for RFI averaged 34% for all phenotyped animals and 13% for all 1.6 million genotyped animals. Including genomic information increased the prediction reliabilities for RFI compared with using only pedigree information. All bulls had low reliabilities, and averaged to only 16% for the top 100 net merit progeny-tested bulls. Analyses using single-step genomic prediction and high-density genotypes gave similar results to those obtained from the national evaluation. The average theoretical reliability for RFI was 18% among the elite young bulls under 5 yr old, being lower in the younger generations of elite bulls compared with older bulls. To conclude, the size of the reference population and its relationship to the predicted population remain as the limiting factors in the genomic prediction for RFI. Continued collection of feed intake data is necessary so that reliabilities can be maintained due to close relationships of phenotyped animals with breeding stock. Considering the currently low prediction reliability and high cost of data collection, focusing RFI data collection on relatives of elite bulls that will have the greatest genetic contribution to the next generation will give more gains and profit.
Copyright © 2020 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy cow; feed efficiency; genomic prediction; residual feed intake

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31954583     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Eating Time as a Genetic Indicator of Methane Emissions and Feed Efficiency in Australian Maternal Composite Sheep.

Authors:  Boris J Sepulveda; Stephanie K Muir; Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Matthew I Knight; Ralph Behrendt; Iona M MacLeod; Jennie E Pryce; Hans D Daetwyler
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Genomic Analysis, Progress and Future Perspectives in Dairy Cattle Selection: A Review.

Authors:  Miguel A Gutierrez-Reinoso; Pedro M Aponte; Manuel Garcia-Herreros
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Metagenomics reveals differences in microbial composition and metabolic functions in the rumen of dairy cows with different residual feed intake.

Authors:  Yunyi Xie; Huizeng Sun; Mingyuan Xue; Jianxin Liu
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-03-08

4.  Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency.

Authors:  Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Iona M MacLeod; Majid Khansefid; Leah C Marett; William J Wales; Filippo Miglior; Christine F Baes; Flavio S Schenkel; Erin E Connor; Coralia I V Manzanilla-Pech; Paul Stothard; Emily Herman; Gert J Nieuwhof; Michael E Goddard; Jennie E Pryce
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.100

5.  Rumen-protected zinc-methionine dietary inclusion alters dairy cow performances, and oxidative and inflammatory status under long-term environmental heat stress.

Authors:  Mohsen Danesh Mesgaran; Hassan Kargar; Rieke Janssen; Sadjad Danesh Mesgaran; Aghil Ghesmati; Amirmansour Vatankhah
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-12

6.  The Ruminant Farm Systems Animal Module: A Biophysical Description of Animal Management.

Authors:  Tayler L Hansen; Manfei Li; Jinghui Li; Chris J Vankerhove; Militsa A Sotirova; Juan M Tricarico; Victor E Cabrera; Ermias Kebreab; Kristan F Reed
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Circulating Metabolites Indicate Differences in High and Low Residual Feed Intake Holstein Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Malia J Martin; Ryan S Pralle; Isabelle R Bernstein; Michael J VandeHaar; Kent A Weigel; Zheng Zhou; Heather M White
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-12-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.