Literature DB >> 31954540

Survival disparities in vulvar cancer patients in Commission on Cancer®-accredited facilities.

Nicole B Gaulin1, Jamie L Lesnock2, Chunqiao Tian3, Kathryn Osei-Bonsu4, Allison Jacobs5, Scott D Richard6, Thomas C Krivak7, Eirwen M Miller8, Craig D Shriver9, Yovanni Casablanca10, G Larry Maxwell11, Kathleen M Darcy12.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate survival disparities and prognostic factors in vulvar cancer by age at diagnosis.
METHODS: Women who underwent surgery and were diagnosed with stage I-IV vulvar cancer from 2004 to 2014 in the National Cancer Database were eligible. Proportions were compared using Chi-Square test. Survival was evaluated using Cox analysis.
RESULTS: There were 18,207 eligible women. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years, and 31% diagnosed ≥75 years old were categorized as elderly. Most vulvar cancers were diagnosed at stage I and with squamous histology. Diagnosis with higher stage or non-squamous histology was more common in elderly vs. non-elderly patients (P < 0.001). Survival was 3.5 times worse in the elderly than the non-elderly (P < 0.0001). Risk of death for each 5-year increment in age increased by 22% for non-elderly and 43% for elderly patients (P < 0.0001). The prognostic value of comorbidity score, stage, regional node assessment and histology was smaller in elderly vs. non-elderly women (each P < 0.05). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) use in the elderly vs. non-elderly was rare for stage I-II disease (3% vs. 2%) and more common for stage III-IV disease (6% vs. 43%), respectively (P < 0.0001). The survival disadvantage for elderly patients persisted following no adjuvant therapy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, or CTRT (P < 0.0001). In stage III-IV disease, survival was superior following CTRT vs. radiotherapy when diagnosed <75 years (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.69-0.93) but not in the elderly (HR = 0.99, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Age-associated risk of death increased at different rates in vulvar cancer and was larger in elderly vs. non-elderly patients. The impact of other prognostic factors was smaller in elderly vs. non-elderly women. The survival benefit of CTRT over radiotherapy in stage III-IV did not extend to the elderly.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant treatment; NCDB; Prognosis; Survival; Vulvar cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 31954540     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  2 in total

1.  Fertility-sparing treatment of locally advanced vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in a young patient.

Authors:  Nujsaubnusi C Vue; Nicole B Gaulin; Zachary D Horne; Sharon Liang; Thomas C Krivak
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-09-13

2.  Comparison of two types of the triple incision technique in the treatment of patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Ying Ma; Wei-Feng Liang; Chang-Hao Liu; Zhong-Qiu Lin; Miao-Fang Wu; Jing Li
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.