Literature DB >> 31954348

Technical and nidus-specific factors associated with adequacy of intraprocedural biopsy samples preceding radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma.

Mohamed M Soliman1, Allison Aguado1, Charles Sutton1, Meera Hameed2, Sinchun Hwang3, John H Healey4, Majid Maybody5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the diagnostic yield of intraprocedural percutaneous biopsy performed at the time of radiofrequency ablation of suspected Osteoid Osteoma (OO) and identify technical and nidus-specific factors associated with diagnostic adequacy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following IRB approval, a total of 42 patients (male: 28, female: 14; mean age: 29 years) who underwent intraprocedural biopsy immediately prior to RFA between June 2010 and June 2017 were retrospectively identified. The nidi were located in various locations. The nidi had a mean size of 6.3 mm (range: 3-11 mm, Standard deviation (SD): 2.26). Core biopsies were performed by one of 15 operators. Biopsies were performed with two needle types ranging from 11-G to 15-G with a mean number of samples of 1.8 (range: 1-5, SD: 1.01). Electronic records and imaging were reviewed for demographics, nidus characteristics, biopsy details and diagnostic yield. Multivariate logistic regression of nidus-specific and biopsy-specific factors was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 22/42 (52.3%) of the biopsies were adequate for histological diagnosis of OO. For the two experienced operators, the diagnostic yield was 67% (6/9) and 80% (8/10). Biopsy adequacy was significantly correlated with presence of an osteoid matrix (p = 0.03), obtaining >1 core sample (p = 0.03), the needle track passing through the nidus (p = 0.0003) and thinner (2.5 mm) intraprocedural CT slices (p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, use of thinner intraprocedural CT slices was found to be associated with adequate biopsy (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Intraprocedural percutaneous biopsy samples of nidi highly-suspected to be OO at the time of RFA were diagnostic in 52% of patients. Multivariate analysis shows thinner intraprocedural CT slices to be a significantly associated with biopsy adequacy.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation; Diagnostic yield; Image-guided biopsy; Osteoid Osteoma; Percutaneous

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31954348      PMCID: PMC7085978          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  19 in total

1.  Percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation of osteoid osteomas: factors affecting therapeutic outcome.

Authors:  G L Cribb; W H Goude; P Cool; B Tins; V N Cassar-Pullicino; D C Mangham
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-07-09       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Persistence or recurrence of pain: a sign of surgical failure is osteoid-osteoma.

Authors:  A Norman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Osteoid osteoma: CT-guided percutaneous resection and follow-up in 38 patients.

Authors:  N Sans; D Galy-Fourcade; J Assoun; T Jarlaud; H Chiavassa; P Bonnevialle; N Railhac; J Giron; H Morera-Maupomé; J J Railhac
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Osteoid osteoma: MR imaging revisited.

Authors:  A R Spouge; L M Thain
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.605

5.  Osteoid-osteoma: diagnostic problems.

Authors:  F H Sim; C D Dahlin; J W Beabout
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Benign bone-forming lesions: osteoma, osteoid osteoma, and osteoblastoma. Clinical, imaging, pathologic, and differential considerations.

Authors:  A Greenspan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Percutaneous biopsy of osteoid osteomas prior to percutaneous treatment using two different biopsy needles.

Authors:  Jean-Denis Laredo; Bassam Hamze; Riadh Jeribi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Skeletal benign bone-forming lesions.

Authors:  A Cerase; F Priolo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  [Treatment of osteoid osteoma by CT-controlled percutaneous drill resection. Apropos of 27 cases].

Authors:  R Kohler; J Rubini; F Postec; I Canterino; F Archimbaud
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1995

10.  Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Current concepts and recent advances.

Authors:  J H Healey; B Ghelman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings on Management of Symptomatic Patients Following Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) of Osteoid Osteoma (OO).

Authors:  Majid Maybody; Mohamed M Soliman; Sinchun Hwang; Adrian Gonzalez-Aguirre; Ernesto G Santos Martin; Elena Kaye; Meier Hsu; Chaya Moskowitz; John H Healey; Nicola Fabbri
Journal:  SN Compr Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-14

2.  Avoiding Misdiagnosis and Missed Diagnosis for Appropriately Treating Spinal Osteoid Osteomas: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Qiming Xu; Wensheng Liu; Hairong Xu; Lijia Cui; Yuan Li; Huachao Shan; Zhen Huang; Ke Ma; Xiaohui Niu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  Osteoid osteoma: which is the best mininvasive treatment option?

Authors:  Anna Parmeggiani; Claudia Martella; Luca Ceccarelli; Marco Miceli; Paolo Spinnato; Giancarlo Facchini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.