Literature DB >> 31954193

Systematic Assessment for Difficult and Severe Asthma Improves Outcomes and Halves Oral Corticosteroid Burden Independent of Monoclonal Biologic Use.

Eve Denton1, Joy Lee2, TunnRen Tay3, Naghmeh Radhakrishna3, Fiona Hore-Lacy3, Anna Mackay3, Ryan Hoy2, Eli Dabscheck3, Robyn E O'Hehir4, Mark Hew2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines endorse systematic assessment for severe asthma, with data indicating benefit across multiple outcome domains.
OBJECTIVE: We examined which patients respond to systematic assessment and whether oral corticosteroid burden can be decreased independent of monoclonal biologic use.
METHODS: Specialist-referred patients are assessed systematically for difficult asthma at our center. We undertook a responder analysis for improvements in the domains of symptom control, quality of life, exacerbations, and airflow obstruction, assessed 6 months after initial assessment. Multivariate analyses were performed for each domain to identify predictors of response. Changes in oral corticosteroid burden were also measured, stratified by monoclonal biologics commenced during assessment.
RESULTS: Among 161 patients assessed systematically, 64% had a reduction in exacerbations, 54% achieved minimum clinically important differences for both symptom control and quality of life, and 40% increased their forced expiratory volume in 1 second by ≥100 mL. Altogether, 87% of patients with asthma improved in at least 1 domain. The most consistent predictor of response across domains was poorer baseline asthma status. There was a substantial reduction in mean chronic oral corticosteroid dose (11-5 mg, n = 46, P < .001), even after excluding 7 patients commenced on monoclonal biologics (11-5.6 mg, n = 39, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Almost 90% of patients undergoing systematic assessment for difficult asthma improve significantly in at least 1 key asthma outcome, with few reliable predictors of response. The halving of oral corticosteroid burden during systematic assessment is independent of, and comparable in magnitude with, that achieved by monoclonal biologics.
Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asthma guidelines; Difficult asthma; Exacerbations; Protocolized assessment; Severe asthma; Systematic assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31954193     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.12.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract


  2 in total

1.  Roadmap to improve regional care for patients with severe asthma.

Authors:  J P M van der Valk; J H Kappen; J S J A van Campen; G Epping; J M A M Retera; D de Bondt; F Suwandy; M Tolboom; J C C M In't Veen; G J Braunstahl
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.871

2.  Multidisciplinary care in chronic airway diseases: the Newcastle model.

Authors:  Vanessa M McDonald; John Harrington; Vanessa L Clark; Peter G Gibson
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2022-08-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.