Literature DB >> 31954156

Adenomyosis incidence, prevalence and treatment: United States population-based study 2006-2015.

Onchee Yu1, Renate Schulze-Rath2, Jane Grafton1, Kelly Hansen1, Delia Scholes1, Susan D Reed3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adenomyosis symptoms are disabling. Population-based data on incidence and prevalence of adenomyosis are lacking that could guide future evidence-based treatments and clinical management.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence, 10-year secular trends, and prevalence of adenomyosis diagnoses and to describe symptoms and treatment patterns in a large U.S. cohort. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study of women aged 16-60 years in 2006-2015, enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Washington, a mixed-model health insurance and care delivery system. Adenomyosis diagnoses identified by ICD codes from the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th editions and potential covariates were extracted from computerized databases. Women with prior hysterectomy, and for incidence estimates women with prior adenomyosis diagnoses, were excluded. Linear trends in incidence rates over the 10-year study period were evaluated using Poisson regression. Rates and trend tests were examined for all women adjusting for age using direct standardization to the 2015 study population, by age groups, and by race/ethnicity. Chart reviews were performed to validate diagnostic accuracy of ICD codes in identifying adenomyosis incidence. Symptoms and treatment patterns at diagnosis and in the following 5 years were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 333,693 women contributed 1,185,855 woman-years (2006-2015) for incidence calculations. Associated symptom-related codes (menorrhagia or abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea or pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and infertility) were observed in 90.8%; 18.0% had co-occurrent endometriosis codes and 47.6% had co-occurrent uterine fibroid codes. The overall adenomyosis incidence was 1.03% or 28.9 per 10,000 woman-years, with a high of 30.6 in 2007 and a low of 24.4 in 2014. Overall age-adjusted estimated incidence rates declined during the 10-year study interval (linear trend P < .05). Incidence was highest for women aged 41-45 years (69.1 per 10,000 woman-years in 2008) and was higher for black (highest 44.6 per 10,000 woman-years in 2011) vs white women (highest 27.9 per 10,000 woman-years in 2010). Overall prevalence in 2015 was 0.8% and was highest among women aged 41-45 years (1.5%). Among the 624 potential adenomyosis cases identified by diagnostic codes in 2012-2015 and with sufficient information in the medical record to determine true case status, 490 were confirmed as incident cases, yielding a 78.5% (95% confidence interval, 75.1%, 81.7%) positive predictive value of adenomyosis ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for identifying an incident adenomyosis case. Health care burden was substantial: 82.0% of women had hysterectomies, nearly 70% had imaging studies suggestive of adenomyosis, and 37.6% used chronic pain medications.
CONCLUSION: Adenomyosis burden to the individual and the health care system is high. Incidence rates are disproportionately high among black women. These findings are of concern, as currently available long-term medical therapies remain limited beyond hysterectomy. Our data and methodologies are novel and could serve as a foundation to guide clinicians and health care systems to develop clinical management plans and track outcomes for women with adenomyosis.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abnormal uterine bleeding; chart review; diagnosis codes; diagnostic accuracy; dysmenorrhea; electronic health record; endometriosis; health care utilization; hysterectomy; menorrhagia; positive predictive value; secular trends; treatment patterns; uterine fibroids

Year:  2020        PMID: 31954156     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  18 in total

1.  Adenomyosis: Mechanisms and Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Junyu Zhai; Silvia Vannuccini; Felice Petraglia; Linda C Giudice
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 1.303

Review 2.  Adenomyosis - An Overview.

Authors:  Stephanie Wong; Charles E Ray
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Prevalence of adenomyosis in women undergoing hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain or uterine prolapse - A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Harald Krentel; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-23

4. 

Authors:  Ebernella Shirin Dason; Crystal Chan; Mara Sobel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The impact of adenomyosis on IVF outcomes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chloe Higgins; Hugo Fernandes; Fabricio Da Silva Costa; Wellington P Martins; Beverley Vollenhoven; Martin Healey
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-04-19

6.  Diagnosis and treatment of adenomyosis.

Authors:  Ebernella Shirin Dason; Crystal Chan; Mara Sobel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Classifying Adenomyosis: Progress and Challenges.

Authors:  Marwan Habiba; Giuseppe Benagiano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Children's Neurological Status Epilepticus and Poor Prognostic Factors through Electroencephalogram Image under Composite Domain Analysis Algorithm.

Authors:  Runhan Zhang; Chao Gao; Junting Liu; Manting Zhao; Yongli Wu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Mode Switch of Ca2 + Oscillation-Mediated Uterine Peristalsis and Associated Embryo Implantation Impairments in Mouse Adenomyosis.

Authors:  Mingzi Qu; Ping Lu; Karl Bellve; Lawrence M Lifshitz; Ronghua ZhuGe
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Integrating Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation Deciphers the Mechanism of Guizhi Fuling Wan against Adenomyosis.

Authors:  Haoxian Wang; Jihong Zhang; Qinqin Zhu; Xianyun Fu; Chenjie Li
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.