Literature DB >> 31953992

Direct comparison study between droplet digital PCR and a combination of allele-specific PCR, asymmetric rapid PCR and melting curve analysis for the detection of BRAF V600E mutation in plasma from melanoma patients.

Eleni Tzanikou1, Verena Haselmann2, Athina Markou1, Angelika Duda2, Jochen Utikal3,4, Michael Neumaier2, Evi S Lianidou1.   

Abstract

Background In metastatic melanoma, 40%-50% of patients harbor a BRAF V600E mutation and are thereby eligible to receive a combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. Compared to standard-of-care tissue-based genetic testing, analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood enables a comprehensive assessment of tumor mutational status in real-time and can be used for monitoring response to therapy. The aim of our study was to directly compare the performance of two highly sensitive methodologies, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and a combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis, for the detection of BRAF V600E in plasma from melanoma patients. Methods Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated from 120 plasma samples of stage I to IV melanoma patients. Identical plasma-cfDNA samples were subjected to BRAF V600E mutational analysis using in parallel, ddPCR and the combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis. Results BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 9/117 (7.7%) ctDNA samples by ddPCR and in 22/117 (18.8%) ctDNA samples by the combination of ARMS/asymmetric- rapid PCR/melting curve analysis. The concordance between these two methodologies was 85.5% (100/117). The comparison of plasma-ctDNA analysis using ddPCR and tissue testing revealed an overall agreement of 79.4% (27/34), while the corresponding agreement using the combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis was 73.5% (25/34). Moreover, comparing the detection of BRAF-mutant ctDNA with the clinics, overall agreement of 87.2% (48/55) for ddPCR and 79.2% (42/53) was demonstrated. Remarkably, the duration of sample storage was negatively correlated with correctness of genotyping results highlighting the importance of pre-analytical factors. Conclusions Our direct comparison study has shown a high level of concordance between ddPCR and the combination of ARMS/asymmetric-rapid PCR/melting curve analysis for the detection of BRAF V600E mutations in plasma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF mutation; ctDNA analysis; liquid biopsy; melanoma; plasma

Year:  2020        PMID: 31953992     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  3 in total

1.  Circulating Tumor DNA Correlates with Outcome in Metastatic Melanoma Treated by BRAF and MEK Inhibitors - Results of a Prospective Biomarker Study.

Authors:  Andrea Forschner; Stephanie Weißgraeber; Dirk Hadaschik; Martin Schulze; Maria Kopp; Sabine Kelkenberg; Tobias Sinnberg; Claus Garbe; Saskia Biskup; Florian Battke
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Reliability of BRAF mutation detection using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors:  Peng Ye; Peiling Cai; Jing Xie; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Liquid profiling of circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer: steps needed to achieve its full clinical value as standard care.

Authors:  Maren Hedtke; Rodrigo Pessoa Rejas; Matthias F Froelich; Volker Ast; Angelika Duda; Laura Mirbach; Victor Costina; Uwe M Martens; Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz; Michael Neumaier; Verena Haselmann
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.449

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.