Literature DB >> 31953951

False positives in the ultrasound diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: some diseases can also show the halo sign.

Elisa Fernández-Fernández1, Irene Monjo-Henry1, Gema Bonilla1, Chamaida Plasencia1, María-Eugenia Miranda-Carús1, Alejandro Balsa1, Eugenio De Miguel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency and causes for the presence of a halo sign on the ultrasound of patients without a diagnosis of GCA.
METHODS: In total, 305 patients with temporal artery colour Doppler ultrasound showing the presence of halo sign (intima-media thickness ≥0.34 mm for temporal arteries [TAs] and ≥1 mm for axillary arteries) were included, and their medical records were reviewed. The clinical diagnosis based on the evolution of the patient over at least one year was established as the definitive diagnosis.
RESULTS: Fourteen of the 305 (4.6%) patients included showed presence of the halo sign without final diagnosis of GCA: 12 patients in the TAs (86%), and two patients with isolated AAs involvement (14%). Their diagnoses were PMR (n = 4, 29%); atherosclerosis (n = 3, 21%); and non-Hodgkin lymphoma type T, osteomyelitis of the skull base, primary amyloidosis associated with multiple myeloma, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, neurosyphilis, urinary sepsis and narrow-angle glaucoma (n = 1 each, 7%).
CONCLUSION: The percentage of halo signs on the ultrasound of patients without GCA is low, but it does exist. There are conditions that may also show the halo sign (true positive halo sign), and we must know these and always correlate the ultrasound findings with the patient's clinic records.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  false positives; giant cell arteritis; halo sign; specificity; temporal arteritis; ultrasonography; ultrasound; vasculitis

Year:  2020        PMID: 31953951     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  9 in total

Review 1.  One Giant Step for Giant Cell Arteritis: Updates in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Marc Dinkin; Editha Johnson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  Temporal Artery Vascular Diseases.

Authors:  Hélène Greigert; André Ramon; Georges Tarris; Laurent Martin; Bernard Bonnotte; Maxime Samson
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Colour Doppler ultrasound and the giant cell arteritis probability score for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a Canadian single-centre experience.

Authors:  Farah Zarka; Maxime Rhéaume; Meriem Belhocine; Michelle Goulet; Guillaume Febrer; Anne-Marie Mansour; Yves Troyanov; Tara Starnino; Rosalie-Sélène Meunier; Isabelle Chagnon; Nathalie Routhier; Valérie Bénard; Stéphanie Ducharme-Bénard; Carolyn Ross; Jean-Paul Makhzoum
Journal:  Rheumatol Adv Pract       Date:  2021-11-10

4.  Validity of the EULAR recommendations on the use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Elisa Fernández-Fernández; Irene Monjo; Diana Peiteado; Alejandro Balsa; Eugenio De Miguel
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-04

5.  Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Katerine López-Gloria; Isabel Castrejón; Juan Carlos Nieto-González; Pablo Rodríguez-Merlos; Belén Serrano-Benavente; Carlos Manuel González; Indalecio Monteagudo Sáez; Teresa González; José María Álvaro-Gracia; Juan Molina-Collada
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-26

Review 6.  Evolution of ultrasound in giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Colm Kirby; Rachael Flood; Ronan Mullan; Grainne Murphy; David Kane
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-10-03

7.  Impact of cardiovascular risk on the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound Halo Score for giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Juan Molina-Collada; Katerine López Gloria; Isabel Castrejón; Juan Carlos Nieto-González; Julia Martínez-Barrio; Ana M Anzola Alfaro; Javier Rivera; José María Álvaro-Gracia
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Imaging for Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Outcome Prediction of Large Vessel Vasculitides.

Authors:  Valentin Sebastian Schäfer; Lei Jin; Wolfgang Andreas Schmidt
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 9.  A Review on the Value of Imaging in Differentiating between Large Vessel Vasculitis and Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Pieter H Nienhuis; Gijs D van Praagh; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Elisabeth Brouwer; Riemer H J A Slart
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-03-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.