Literature DB >> 31952944

Health Risk Assessments in Michigan's Medicaid Expansion: Early Experiences in Primary Care.

Eunice Zhang1, Renuka Tipirneni2, Erin R Beathard3, Sunghee Lee4, Matthias A Kirch3, Cengiz Salman3, Erica Solway3, Sarah J Clark5, Adrianne N Haggins6, Edith C Kieffer7, John Z Ayanian2, Susan D Goold8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Michigan is one of 3 states that have implemented health risk assessments for enrollees as a feature of its Medicaid expansion, the Healthy Michigan Plan. This study describes primary care providers' early experiences with completing health risk assessments with enrollees and examines provider- and practice-level factors that affect health risk assessment completion.
METHODS: All primary care providers caring for ≥12 Healthy Michigan Plan enrollees (n=4,322) were surveyed from June to November 2015, with 2,104 respondents (55.5%). Analyses in 2016-2017 described provider knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with the health risk assessment early in Healthy Michigan Plan implementation; multivariable analyses examined relationships of provider- and practice-level characteristics with health risk assessment completion, as recorded in state data.
RESULTS: Of the primary care provider respondents, 73% found health risk assessments very or somewhat useful for identifying and discussing health risks, although less than half (47.2%) found them very or somewhat useful for getting patients to change health behaviors. Most primary care provider respondents (65.3%) were unaware of financial incentives for their practices to complete health risk assessments. Nearly all primary care providers had completed at least 1 health risk assessment. The mean health risk assessment completion rate (completed health risk assessments/number of Healthy Michigan Plan enrollees assigned to that primary care provider) was 19.6%; those who lacked familiarity with the health risk assessment had lower completion rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Early in program implementation, health risk assessment completion rates by primary care providers were low and awareness of financial incentives limited. Most primary care provider respondents perceived health risk assessments to be very or somewhat useful in identifying health risks, and about half of primary care providers viewed health risk assessments as very or somewhat useful in helping patients to change health behaviors.
Copyright © 2019 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31952944      PMCID: PMC7085853          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  27 in total

1.  The routine use of health risk appraisals: results from a national study of physician organizations.

Authors:  Helen Ann Halpin; Sara B McMenamin; Julie Schmittdiel; Robin R Gillies; Stephen M Shortell; Thomas Rundall; Larry Casalino
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

2.  Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Deborah Schrag; J Lee Hargraves; Peter B Bach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Iowa's Medicaid Expansion Promoted Healthy Behaviors But Was Challenging To Implement And Attracted Few Participants.

Authors:  Natoshia M Askelson; Brad Wright; Suzanne Bentler; Elizabeth T Momany; Peter Damiano
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Anthony Scott; Peter Sivey; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Lisa Willenberg; Lucio Naccarella; John Furler; Doris Young
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

5.  Perspectives of family physicians on computer-assisted health-risk assessments.

Authors:  Farah Ahmad; Harvey A Skinner; Donna E Stewart; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Be SMART: examining the experience of implementing the NHS Health Check in UK primary care.

Authors:  Rachel L Shaw; Helen M Pattison; Carol Holland; Richard Cooke
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Official statistics and claims data records indicate non-response and recall bias within survey-based estimates of health care utilization in the older population.

Authors:  Matthias Hunger; Larissa Schwarzkopf; Margit Heier; Annette Peters; Rolf Holle
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Patient and primary care provider experience using a family health history collection, risk stratification, and clinical decision support tool: a type 2 hybrid controlled implementation-effectiveness trial.

Authors:  R Ryanne Wu; Lori A Orlando; Tiffany L Himmel; Adam H Buchanan; Karen P Powell; Elizabeth R Hauser; Astrid B Agbaje; Vincent C Henrich; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of primary prevention and health promotion activities in primary care: a synthesis through meta-ethnography.

Authors:  Maria Rubio-Valera; Mariona Pons-Vigués; María Martínez-Andrés; Patricia Moreno-Peral; Anna Berenguera; Ana Fernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The impact of financial incentives on the implementation of asthma or diabetes self-management: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tracy Jackson; Michael D Shields; Liam G Heaney; Marilyn Kendall; Christina J Pearce; Chi Yan Hui; Hilary Pinnock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.