Literature DB >> 31952493

The effect of therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolones on clinical outcome in critically ill patients: the DOLPHIN trial protocol of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.

A Abdulla1, T M J Ewoldt2, N G M Hunfeld3,2, A E Muller4,5, W J R Rietdijk2, S Polinder6, T van Gelder3,7, H Endeman2, B C P Koch3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients undergo extensive physiological alterations that will have impact on antibiotic pharmacokinetics. Up to 60% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients meet the pharmacodynamic targets of beta-lactam antibiotics, with only 30% in fluoroquinolones. Not reaching these targets might increase the chance of therapeutic failure, resulting in increased mortality and morbidity, and antibiotic resistance. The DOLPHIN trial was designed to demonstrate the added value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolones in critically ill patients in the ICU.
METHODS: A multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) was designed to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of model-based TDM of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolones. Four hundred fifty patients will be included within 24 months after start of inclusion. Eligible patients will be randomly allocated to either study group: the intervention group (active TDM) or the control group (non-TDM). In the intervention group dose adjustment of the study antibiotics (cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, amoxicillin, amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, flucloxacillin, piperacillin with tazobactam, meropenem, and ciprofloxacin) on day 1, 3, and 5 is performed based upon TDM with a Bayesian model. The primary outcome will be ICU length of stay. Other outcomes amongst all survival, disease severity, safety, quality of life after ICU discharge, and cost effectiveness will be included. DISCUSSION: No trial has investigated the effect of early TDM of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolones on clinical outcome in critically ill patients. The findings from the DOLPHIN trial will possibly lead to new insights in clinical management of critically ill patients receiving antibiotics. In short, to TDM or not to TDM? TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2017-004677-14. Sponsor protocol name: DOLPHIN. Registered 6 March 2018 . Protocol Version 6, Protocol date: 27 November 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic; Beta-lactam; Critically ill patients; Fluoroquinolones; Length of stay; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Randomised controlled trial; Therapeutic drug monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31952493      PMCID: PMC6969462          DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-4781-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


Background

In intensive care units (ICU) critically ill patients from all medical specialties are treated. Consequently, the ICU population is highly heterogeneous and among the most complex and expensive within healthcare [1]. Results of a large international prospective trial show that 70% of ICU patients receive antibiotics [2]. However, both the incidence of infections and associated mortality in the ICU have not improved over the last 30 years [3-5]. This indicates that improvements in clinical outcomes of ICU patients might be possible. Standard dosing regimens of antibiotics are usually empirically prescribed based upon a most probable diagnosis. Due to physiological changes in ICU patients, the pharmacokinetic (PK) behaviour is different from non-ICU patients and subject to impressive changes. Augmented renal clearance is prevalent, even with normal serum creatinine levels [6, 7]. Dosing regimens used are designed for non-severely ill patients and derived from studies in healthy volunteers. This might result in inadequate antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients. Frequent changes in the renal function, volume of distribution and extravascular loss of fluids are also prevalent, which results in pharmacodynamic variability [8]. Furthermore, parameters frequently used in patients on the regular wards, such as serum creatinine, might not be reliable in ICU patients. As a consequence, this results in suboptimal dosing followed by treatment failure and increased mortality [9]. Dosing of antibiotics is based upon the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of micro-organisms. The actual MIC is often unknown and unreliable to determine [10]. The epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFF) describes, for a given species and antibiotic, the highest MIC for organisms devoid of phenotypically-detectable acquired resistance mechanisms. It defines the upper end of the wild-type distribution [11]. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships have been described for most antimicrobial classes. These relationships show a marked consistency, and the pharmacodynamic index values that result in a certain effect have been determined for most classes of antibiotics [12]. The pharmacodynamic targets (PDTs) are the minimum value of the PK/PD index that are based on preclinical and clinical drug/micro-organism exposure-response relationships. Not reaching antibiotic PDTs is associated with therapeutic failure and increased microbial resistance [13-15]. Target attainment is reported only in 60% of beta-lactam use in the ICU [16]. Ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone has a reported target attainment of respectively 60–80%, and 17–30% for bacteria with MICs of ≤0.25, and 0.5 mg/L [17-20]. As imaginable, therapeutic failure might increase ICU length of stay (ICU LOS). Prolonged ICU LOS is associated with higher ICU, hospital, and 1-year mortality rate [21] as well as greater use of ICU resources [22]. On the other hand, high dosing regimens might result in trough levels associated with toxicity [23]. Simply increasing the standard dosing on the ICU is therefore not optimal: the inter- and intrapatient variability is too high. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) might be used to optimise pharmacological target attainment and therefore decrease therapeutic failure [24]. Dose adjustments will need to be made in an early phase of treatment, since quick intervention in antibiotics is essential for patients with sepsis [25]. Usually a trough concentration (Ctrough) is used for asserting antibiotic effectiveness. However steady state trough concentrations may not be reached before four previous doses of medication [26]. To predict those concentrations, model based TDM for individualized therapy might be a valuable tool [27]. To the best of our knowledge, no RCT has investigated the effect of TDM of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolones on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.

Primary objective

The primary objective of the trial is to determine the effect of early model-based TDM of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolones on clinical outcome in critically ill patients.

Methods and design

The DOLPHIN trial is a prospective, multi-centre, RCT investigating whether early model-based therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolones is superior to standard drug dosing on the intensive care. The two study groups are defined as 1) the intervention group, which will receive TDM of study antibiotics, and 2) the control group, which will receive treatment as usual. The trial is anticipated to include 450 patients from over 8 ICUs in the Netherlands over a 24 month period. Data analysis will be done based on the intention-to-treat principle. Patients will be randomised to one of the study groups by a 1:1 ratio, assigned by a computerised randomisation programme (ALEA Randomisation Service). The block randomisation is stratified by study centre and antibiotic group. Study antibiotics are cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, amoxicillin, amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, flucloxacillin, piperacillin with tazobactam, meropenem and ciprofloxacin.

Participants

All patients admitted to the ICU wards and given standard of care intravenous therapy of the study antibiotics will be screened against the inclusion criteria. Identification of eligible patients will occur on a daily basis by training research or clinical staff at the participating study sites. Informed consent is obtained before participation in the trial by the research staff or responsible clinician. If a patient is incapable of giving consent, a legal representative will be inquired. If possible, informed consent from the patient is obtained at day five in case of deferred consent by a legal representative.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Patients will need to be 18 years or older, receive intravenous antibiotic therapy of the study antibiotics and treatment should be aimed for at least 2 days at time of inclusion. Patients will be excluded in the case of pregnancy, antibiotic cessation before the first blood sample collection, already being enrolled in this trial or any other intervention trial, or receiving study antibiotics only as prophylaxis within the context of selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD). Medium care and burn wound patients will also be excluded. Patients will need to fulfil all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria at randomisation. An inclusion scheme is followed (Appendix 2), in which per hospital and time period the anticipated inclusion rate is presented.

Sample size calculation

We hypothesized that active TDM versus non-TDM will decrease median ICU LOS from 7 to 6 days (baseline 7 ± 3.5, data of five hospitals ICU LOS [28, 29]). With alpha level of 0.05, and power of 0.80, the sample size is calculated as 192 per group. Considering a drop-out percentage of approximate 15%, 450 patients are required in total.

Pharmacokinetic sampling

Blood samples will be obtained from the patient at day 1, 3, 5 and 7 (Fig. 1) during the morning round of antibiotic administration. A Ctrough (30 min before antibiotics infusion) and Cmax (30 min after completion of antibiotics infusion) will be collected for each measuring moment. Total and unbound drug concentrations will be measured in serum by means of a validated LC-MS/MS method in the Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC) [30]. Samples obtained in an external centre will be transported to the Erasmus MC for analysis. In the intervention group the analysis will be performed and reported on the same day. In the control group blood samples will be collected according to the same sampling scheme, and the samples will be analysed in bulk later.
Fig. 1

Diagram of the trial design. Ctrough, trough concentration of study antibiotic; Cmax, maximum concentration of study antibiotic

Diagram of the trial design. Ctrough, trough concentration of study antibiotic; Cmax, maximum concentration of study antibiotic

Modelling

Patient-specific parameters and antibiotic serum levels will be used to calculated expected antibiotic exposures. InsightRX™ (version 1.15.16, San Francisco, California), a cloud-based clinical decision support platform, will be used to assess individualized dosing regimens using model-informed precision dosing. For model fitting and simulation of concentration time courses, validated and peer-reviewed research of population-based PK/PD models in ICU patients will be used. Based upon these models and the serum antibiotic levels, time unbound levels above MIC (fT > MIC), unbound area under the curve divided by MIC (fAUC0-24h/MIC) and through concentrations (Ctrough) will be calculated. Dose adjustment in the intervention group is performed based on the PK/PD targets and dose reduction thresholds as described in Table 1. For each of the antibiotics, the ECOFF of the presumed pathogen, as defined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), was used [31].
Table 1

PK/PD targets and thresholds for dose reduction of antibiotic groups

AntimicrobialsTargetThreshold dose reduction
Beta-lactamsfT above MIC = 100%Ctrough > 10 x MIC
CiprofloxacinfAUC0-24h/MIC ratio ≥> 100 fAUC0-24h/MIC ratio > 400 
PK/PD targets and thresholds for dose reduction of antibiotic groups

Trial intervention

Based upon the abovementioned calculations, a dosage recommendation will be communicated on the same day as sampling to the treating physician by a hospital pharmacist or trained researcher. In case of under- or overdosing, the dosage will be increased or decreased as described in Table 2. Adherence or deviation from this advice will be registered in the electronic Case Report File (eCRF).
Table 2

Dosage advice options for intervention

Dosage adjustmentDose recommendations
Dose increaseIncrease dose administration frequency by 25–50%
Increase dose by 25–50% with same dosing frequency
Dose reductionDecrease dose administration frequency
Decrease dose by 25–50% with same dosing frequency
Withhold administration for 1 day
Dosage advice options for intervention

Data collection

All collected data will be stored into an eCRF. Laboratory data will include: serum liver enzymes, bilirubin, creatinine, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, haemoglobin, white blood cells, albumin and thrombocytes. Clinical data involve the daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, fluid balance, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation version 4 (APACHE IV) score, surgery in the 5 days before admission, use of extra-corporal devices, mechanical ventilation, other antibiotics next to the study antibiotics and comorbidities. We will also collect the admission data which includes the admission diagnosis and reason for starting antibiotics, admission and discharge dates and 28-day mortality. The most prevalent and most severe side effects will also be collected. Quality of life will be assessed at 6 months with EuroQol™ 5D-5 L Questionnaire. The economic evaluation will be performed from a hospital perspective. Only direct medical costs will be included. We will use charges as published in Dutch guidelines as a proxy of real costs.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics

We will include baseline characteristics related to the patient, the admission, and hospital. A complete overview of variables measured in the DOLPHIN trial is presented in Appendix 3. Continuous variables will be presented as mean with corresponding standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed, and median with ranges if data are skewed. Normality will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Categorical variables will be given in numbers and percentages. We will assess whether these baseline characteristics are significantly different between the two study groups. For continuous variables we will compare the means using an independent-sample t-test or Mann Whitney-U test when normally or non-normally distributed, respectively. For categorical variables, we will examine statistical differences between study groups using a chi-square test.

Primary outcome

The primary outcome is ICU LOS. This outcome is based on count data which will be analysed using a poisson regression. The ICU LOS of patients transferred to another ICU are calculated between ICU admission and transfer date. The effect size will be expressed in a crude relative risk estimate and absolute risk reduction. Next to the crude study effect, control variables will be added to the poisson regression model in case baseline characteristics are statistically significant different with a P-value < 0.15 in the univariate analysis. This sensitivity analysis is performed to adjust for residual (large) baseline imbalances to assess their impact and to assess the robustness of the primary analysis.

Secondary outcomes

We identified eight secondary outcomes, namely: (1) ICU survival; (2) 28 day survival; (3) incidence of most common side-effects. Regarding the effect of the treatment: (4) antibiotic target attainment; (5) sickness severity change with delta-SOFA scores between start of antibiotics and day 5 [32]; (6) changes in infectious parameters; (7) quality of Life 6 months after admission with EuroQol™ 5D-5 L Questionnaire; (8) Costs and cost-effectiveness from a hospital perspective. Statistically significant differences for continuous and categorical variables between study groups will be assessed using an independent sample t-test and chi-square test, respectively. If a continuous variable is non-normally distributed, a Mann Whitney-U test will be employed to assess the statistical differences. In case of imbalances between the two groups (as assessed by the univariate analyses), we will switch to poisson regression, binary logistic regression, or linear regression for count, binary outcome, or continuous outcomes, respectively. We will adjust these models for the imbalanced variables. The cost-effectiveness of TDM will be assessed by calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, defined as the difference in costs of TDM compared to usual care, divided by the average change in effectiveness.

Data monitoring

Because of the nature of the trial with a low risk of intermediate complications, an independent monitor will visit each study site every 6 months. 25% of all cases are randomly selected for verification by the independent monitor. Informed consent, source data and reported serious adverse events (SAEs) are reviewed for errors. The data will be pseudonymised when stored in the database and then used for analysis.

Serious adverse events

SAEs will be reported to the local medical ethics committee through an online platform within 7 days of occurrence. These will include deaths or re-admissions within the trial period of 6 months follow-up. Selected adverse drug reactions are reported until day seven. Research staff is trained how to address SAEs and how to report these to the coordinating researcher.

Dissemination

Findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication, and to local and international conferences. As we have multiple secondary outcomes, we expect to submit multiple publications to peer-reviewed journals. Findings will be communicated to the public through media coverage and personal website(s).

Discussion

It is important to dose antibiotics correctly to prevent therapeutic failure, toxicity, and antimicrobial resistance. The DOLPHIN trial, a multi-centre RCT with clinical outcome as an endpoint, aims to answer the question whether TDM of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolones in critically ill patients is of added value. This design is quite unique in TDM studies. Several studies have retrospectively reported a better outcome when beta-lactam pharmacodynamic targets are attained. However, these positive effects have never been confirmed in a prospective clinical trial. Continuous infusion of antibiotics is being used in an increasing number of ICUs. The results seem promising on clinical cure rate and ventilator-free days [33, 34]. However - with one dose for all patients - it still does not take the augmented renal clearance and variability of ICU patients’ pharmacokinetics into account. TDM is already gaining terrain in guidelines and reviews, in which TDM of beta-lactam antibiotics is advised when high PK variability is expected [35, 36]. Nonetheless, these guidelines are not based upon prospective randomised trials. Patient recruitment is an ongoing challenge in many RCTs. We will evaluate the inclusion rate at multiple time points during the trial. If the inclusion rate is too low, we will approach additional centres to participate in the trial. Until now, the effect of early TDM of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolones on clinical outcome in the critically ill has not yet been investigated in a multi-centre RCT. This makes the DOLPHIN trial unique in its field. Its findings may lead to new insights and more evidence based clinical management of the patient receiving antibiotics on the ICU.
Table 3

Participating medical centres and the inclusion estimations. The participating centres of the DOLPHIN trial, the date of the start of the study and the estimated inclusions in study sites

Study sitesStart dateExpected enrollment
Erasmus Medical Center (Rotterdam)01–11–2018100
Haaglanden Medical Center (The Hague)01-07-201950
Haga Hospital (The Hague)01-07-201950
Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland (Rotterdam)01-07-201950
Amphia Hospital (Breda)01-10-201950
Groene Hart Hospital (Gouda)01-12-201950
Isala Hospital (Zwolle)01-12-201950
Diakonessenhuis (Utrecht)01–01–202050
  33 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in critical illness.

Authors:  Rina Mehrotra; Raffaele De Gaudio; Mark Palazzo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  The role of infection models and PK/PD modelling for optimising care of critically ill patients with severe infections.

Authors:  T Tängdén; V Ramos Martín; T W Felton; E I Nielsen; S Marchand; R J Brüggemann; J B Bulitta; M Bassetti; U Theuretzbacher; B T Tsuji; D W Wareham; L E Friberg; J J De Waele; V H Tam; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  First-dose and steady-state population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin by continuous or intermittent dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Michael S Roberts; Andrew J Dalley; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  The ciprofloxacin target AUC : MIC ratio is not reached in hospitalized patients with the recommended dosing regimens.

Authors:  Michiel Haeseker; Leo Stolk; Fred Nieman; Christian Hoebe; Cees Neef; Cathrien Bruggeman; Annelies Verbon
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Jordi Rello; John Marshall; Eliezer Silva; Antonio Anzueto; Claude D Martin; Rui Moreno; Jeffrey Lipman; Charles Gomersall; Yasser Sakr; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Augmented renal clearance is a common finding with worse clinical outcome in critically ill patients receiving antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  Barbara O M Claus; Eric A Hoste; Kirsten Colpaert; Hugo Robays; Johan Decruyenaere; Jan J De Waele
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.425

7.  Incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units: the prospective, multicentre INSEP study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  SOFA and mortality endpoints in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Harm-Jan de Grooth; Irma L Geenen; Armand R Girbes; Jean-Louis Vincent; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Optimization of the treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients-guidelines from the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Société Française de Pharmacologie et Thérapeutique-SFPT) and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société Française d'Anesthésie et Réanimation-SFAR).

Authors:  Romain Guilhaumou; Sihem Benaboud; Youssef Bennis; Claire Dahyot-Fizelier; Eric Dailly; Peggy Gandia; Sylvain Goutelle; Sandrine Lefeuvre; Nicolas Mongardon; Claire Roger; Julien Scala-Bertola; Florian Lemaitre; Marc Garnier
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  The epidemiology of severe sepsis in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 1996 to 2004: secondary analysis of a high quality clinical database, the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database.

Authors:  David A Harrison; Catherine A Welch; Jane M Eddleston
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  16 in total

1.  The future of antimicrobial dosing in the ICU: an opportunity for data science.

Authors:  Thomas De Corte; Paul Elbers; Jan De Waele
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Effect of Obesity on Clinical Failure of Patients Treated With β-Lactams.

Authors:  Nathan A Pinner; Natalie G Tapley; Katie E Barber; Kayla R Stover; Jamie L Wagner
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.835

3.  Health Care Costs of Target Attainment for Beta-Lactam Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of the EXPAT Study.

Authors:  Tim M J Ewoldt; Alan Abdulla; Nicole G M Hunfeld; Anouk E Muller; Diederik Gommers; Suzanne Polinder; Birgit C P Koch; Henrik Endeman
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.118

4.  Population pharmacokinetics and target attainment of ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Alan Abdulla; Omar Rogouti; Nicole G M Hunfeld; Henrik Endeman; Annemieke Dijkstra; Teun van Gelder; Anouk E Muller; Brenda C M de Winter; Birgit C P Koch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Carbapenem Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Adult Patients and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sharon Lechtig-Wasserman; Hans Liebisch-Rey; Nicolas Diaz-Pinilla; Jhosep Blanco; Yuli-Viviana Fuentes-Barreiro; Rosa-Helena Bustos
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 6.  Utility, promise, and limitations of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based therapeutic drug monitoring in precision medicine.

Authors:  Vanessa P Gaspar; Sahar Ibrahim; René P Zahedi; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 1.982

7.  Hyperinflammation Reduces Midazolam Metabolism in Critically Ill Adults with COVID-19.

Authors:  Tim J L Smeets; Abraham J Valkenburg; Mathieu van der Jagt; Birgit C P Koch; Henrik Endeman; Diederik A M P J Gommers; Sebastian D T Sassen; Nicole G M Hunfeld
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 5.577

8.  Failure of target attainment of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients and associated risk factors: a two-center prospective study (EXPAT).

Authors:  Alan Abdulla; Annemieke Dijkstra; Nicole G M Hunfeld; Henrik Endeman; Soma Bahmany; Tim M J Ewoldt; Anouk E Muller; Teun van Gelder; Diederik Gommers; Birgit C P Koch
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Intensive Care Unit: The Role of Biomarkers, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Patrícia Moniz; Luís Coelho; Pedro Póvoa
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 10.  The Pharmacokinetics of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics Using Scavenged Samples in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients: The EXPAT Kids Study Protocol.

Authors:  Stef Schouwenburg; Enno D Wildschut; M de Hoog; Birgit C P Koch; Alan Abdulla
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.