| Literature DB >> 31952282 |
Michael Parcey1,2, Steven Gayder1,2, Alan J Castle3, Antonet M Svircev2.
Abstract
Due to the emergence of antibiotic resistance, phage-mediated biocontrol has become an attractive alternative for pathogen management in agriculture. While the infection characteristics of many phages can be adequately described using plaque assays and optical density, the results from phages of the apple pathogen Erwinia amylovora have low reproducibility with these techniques. Using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), the stage of the lytic cycle was determined through a combination of chloroform-based sampling, centrifugation, and DNase treatment. Monitoring the transition of phage genomes through the lytic cycle generates a molecular profile from which phage infection characteristics such as adsorption rate and burst size can be determined. To our knowledge, this is the first report of qPCR being used to determine these infection parameters. The characteristics of four different genera of Erwinia phages were determined. The phage ΦEa461A1 was able to adsorb at a rate up to 6.6 times faster than ΦEa35-70 and ΦEa9-2. The low enrichment titer of ΦEa92 was shown to be due to the absence of lysis. The ΦEa461A1 and ΦEa214 phages had the highest productivity, with burst sizes of 57 virions in 38 min and 185 virions in 98 min, respectively, suggesting these genera would make stronger candidates for the phage-mediated biocontrol of E. amylovora.Entities:
Keywords: Erwinia amylovora; Pantoea agglomerans; adsorption; bacteriophage; biocontrol; burst size; latent period
Year: 2020 PMID: 31952282 PMCID: PMC7014438 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21020553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Modifying qPCR quantification to select for encapsidated and non-absorbed phage genomes. (a) Standard qPCR quantification will quantify all phage genomes and virions in solution. (b) DNase treatment selects only virions. (c) After centrifugation, the supernatant contains only non-adsorbed phage genomes and virions. (d) The use of centrifugation and DNase treatment selects non-adsorbed virions. The circles represent the selected genomes and the color of the circle corresponds to the curves of the MPI. Chloroform sampling is assumed to have been used for all qPCRs.
Figure 2Transition states of the phage genome through the lytic cycle and their associated curves in a simulated molecular profile of phage infection. (a) Adsorption of the phage into the bacterial hosts leads to a decrease in the number of virions in the supernatant. (b) Ejection of the phage genome into the host leads to a decrease in the total number of phage particles. (c) Replication of the phage genome leads to an increase in the total number of phage genomes. (d) Expression of phage structural proteins leads to phage genome encapsidation and an increase in the overall number of virions. (e) Lysis leads to an increase in the number of virions and phage genomes in the supernatant.
Figure 3Correlation between the quantification using plating techniques and qPCR-based assays. (a) Bacterial quantification using dilution plating compared to qPCR for E. amylovora (Ea) and P. agglomerans (Pa). (b) Phage quantification using plaque assays compared to DNase-based qPCR for the four phages tested. The symbols represent the mean of matched-pair data produced in triplicate, which was normalized to the initial CFU/mL or PFU/mL. The diagonal lines represent prefect agreement between the two techniques.
Figure 4Molecular profile of phage infection of the four genera of Erwinia phages in this study. (a) Infection of E. amylovora Ea6-4 by phage ΦEa21-4 at an multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.45. (b) Infection of E. amylovora EaD7 by phage ΦEa46-1-A1 at an MOI of 0.625. (c) Infection of E. amylovora Ea17-1-1 by phage ΦEa9-2 at an MOI of 0.015. (d) Infection of E. amylovora Ea273 by phage ΦEa9-2 at an MOI of 0.015. (e) Infection of P. agglomerans Pa39-7 by phage ΦEa35-70 at an MOI of 0.03. (f) Infection of P. agglomerans Pa39-7 by phage ΦEa35-70 at an MOI of 0.7. The symbols represent the mean of data produced in triplicate, the line is a local regression model of the data (LOESS), and the shaded area around the line represents a 95% confidence interval. MOIs were calculated using the qPCR data at t0. Here, (blue diamond) = total number of phage genomes; (green circle) = total number of phage genomes in the supernatant; (purple triangle = total number of virions; (red square = total number of virions in the supernatant.
Infection characteristics of the lytic cycle as determined through the molecular profile of phage infection.
| Lytic Cycle Stage | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adsorption A | Infection B | Genomic Rep. | Encapsidation | Lysis | ||
| Phage | Rate (min−1): Max (%) | Rate (min−1): Max (%) | Start (min): Rate (min−1) | Start (min): Rate (min−1): Virions C | Start (min): Rate (min−1): Burst Size | End (min) |
| ND | 0.052: 60.7 | 29: 0.166 | 37: 0.191: 63 | 57: 0.318: 185 | 98 | |
| 0.290: 95.7 | 0.221: 93.4 | 21: 0.173 | 23: 0.537: 45 | 23: 0.712: 57 | 38 | |
| 0.071: 97.6 | 0.074: 96.3 | 39: 0.154 | 52: 0.196: 49 | ND: ND: 51 | ND | |
| 0.167: 99.0 | 0.152: 90.3 | 35: 0.139 | 50: 0.215: 768 | 65: 0.301: 850 | 137 | |
| 0.044: 87.8 | 0.051: 87.7 | 28: 0.090 | 42: 0.181: 31 | 56: 0.174: 43 | 108 | |
| ND | 0.074: 84.3 | 28: 0.174 | 43: 0.160: 35 | 52: 0.090: 42 | 116 | |
ND—Not determined; A In all cases, adsorption began at t0; B The percentage and rate at which phage caused infection; C The number of intracellular virions prior to lytic burst.
Phage and bacterial isolates used in this study.
| Family | Strain |
| Accession | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ΦEa21-4 |
| NC_011811.1 | [ |
| ΦEa35-70 |
| NC_023557.1 | [ | |
|
| ΦEa46-1-A1 |
| Unpublished | [ |
| ΦEa9-2 |
| KF806588.1 | [ | |
|
| Ea6-4 |
| Unpublished | [ |
| EaD7 |
| Unpublished | [ | |
| Ea17-1-1 |
| Unpublished | [ | |
| Ea273 |
| NC_013971.1 | [ | |
| Pa39-7 |
| Unpublished | [ |
Primers and probes used for molecular quantification of phage and bacteria.
| Target | Name | Sequences (5’-3’) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ΦEa21-4 | END37-F | TTCAGCTTTAGCGGCTTCGAGA | [ |
| END37-R | AGCAAGCCCTTGAGGTAATGGA | ||
| END37-P | /56-ROXN/AGTCGGTACACCTGCAACGTCAAGAT/3IAbRQSp/ | ||
| ΦEa35-70 | RDH311-F | TGGAAGGTCTTCTTCGAGAC | [ |
| RDH311-R | GACTACCTGGGGATGTTCAG | ||
| RDH311-P | /56-ROX/GACGGAAAAGATCACGGTACTCTT/3IAbRQSp/ | ||
| ΦEa46-1-A1 | STS3-F | GACAAACAAGAACGCGGCAACTGA | [ |
| STS3-R | ATACCCAGCAAGGCGTCAACCTTA | ||
| STS3-P | /56-FAM/AGATGAAGTAGGTTATCTTCACAGTGCCCT/3BHQ_1/ | ||
| ΦEa9-2 | N14-F | CATTGGGTAATCCCTTTGAG | [ |
| N14-R | GATAGACTGGTTCCCCTGTG | ||
| N14-P | /56-FAM/TCTGGTGGA/ZEN/CAGAGACGATGTAAT/3IABkFQ/ | ||
|
| Pa-Gnd-F | TGGATGAAGCAGCGAACA | [ |
| Pa-Gnd-R | GACAGAGGTTCGCCGAGA | ||
| Pa-Gnd-P | /5HEX/AAATGGACCAGCCAGAGCTCACTG/3BHQ-1/ | ||
|
| Ea-Lsc-F | CGCTAACAGCAGATCGCA | [ |
| Ea-Lsc-R | AAATACGCGCACGACCAT | ||
| Ea-Lsc-P | /5Cy5/CTGATAATCCGCAATTCCAGGATG/3IAbRQsp/ |