BACKGROUND: Clinical frailty is an important syndrome for clinical care and research, independently predicting mortality and rates of institutionalisation in a range of medical conditions. However, there has been little research into the role of frailty in stroke. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of frailty on 28-day mortality following ischaemic stroke and outcomes following stroke thrombolysis. METHODS: Frailty was measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) for all ischaemic stroke admissions aged ≥75 years. Stroke severity was measured using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). 28-day mortality and clinical outcomes were collected retrospectively. Analysis included both dichotomised measures of frailty (non-frail: CFS 1-4, frail: 5-8) and CFS as a continuous ordinal scale. RESULTS: In 433 individuals with ischaemic stroke, 28-day mortality was higher in frail versus non-frail individuals (39 (16.7%) versus 10 (5%), P < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, a one-point increase in CFS was independently associated with 28-day mortality (OR 1.03 (1.01-1.05)). In 63 thrombolysed individuals, median NIHSS reduced significantly in non-frail individuals (12.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 9.25) to 5 (IQR 10.5), P < 0.01) but not in frail individuals (15 (IQR 11.5) to 16 (IQR 16.5), P = 0.23). On multivariable analysis, a one-point increase in CFS was independently associated with a one-point reduction in post-thrombolysis NIHSS improvement (coefficient 1.07, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Clinical frailty is independently associated with 28-day mortality after ischaemic stroke and appears independently associated with attenuated improvement in NIHSS following stroke thrombolysis. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and how frailty may be utilised in clinical decision-making.
BACKGROUND: Clinical frailty is an important syndrome for clinical care and research, independently predicting mortality and rates of institutionalisation in a range of medical conditions. However, there has been little research into the role of frailty in stroke. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of frailty on 28-day mortality following ischaemic stroke and outcomes following stroke thrombolysis. METHODS: Frailty was measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) for all ischaemic stroke admissions aged ≥75 years. Stroke severity was measured using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). 28-day mortality and clinical outcomes were collected retrospectively. Analysis included both dichotomised measures of frailty (non-frail: CFS 1-4, frail: 5-8) and CFS as a continuous ordinal scale. RESULTS: In 433 individuals with ischaemic stroke, 28-day mortality was higher in frail versus non-frail individuals (39 (16.7%) versus 10 (5%), P < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, a one-point increase in CFS was independently associated with 28-day mortality (OR 1.03 (1.01-1.05)). In 63 thrombolysed individuals, median NIHSS reduced significantly in non-frail individuals (12.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 9.25) to 5 (IQR 10.5), P < 0.01) but not in frail individuals (15 (IQR 11.5) to 16 (IQR 16.5), P = 0.23). On multivariable analysis, a one-point increase in CFS was independently associated with a one-point reduction in post-thrombolysis NIHSS improvement (coefficient 1.07, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Clinical frailty is independently associated with 28-day mortality after ischaemic stroke and appears independently associated with attenuated improvement in NIHSS following stroke thrombolysis. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and how frailty may be utilised in clinical decision-making.
Authors: Henry de Berker; Archy de Berker; Htin Aung; Pedro Duarte; Salman Mohammed; Hamsaraj Shetty; Tom Hughes Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 2.659
Authors: Jurre Blaauw; Bram Jacobs; Heleen M den Hertog; Niels A van der Gaag; Korné Jellema; Ruben Dammers; Kuan H Kho; Rob J M Groen; Joukje van der Naalt; Hester F Lingsma Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Jennifer K Burton; Jennifer Stewart; Mairi Blair; Sinead Oxley; Amy Wass; Martin Taylor-Rowan; Terence J Quinn Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 12.782
Authors: Alexander T Janke; Snigdha Jain; Ula Hwang; Mark Rosenberg; Kevin Biese; Sandra Schneider; Pawan Goyal; Arjun K Venkatesh Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Marlena Schnieder; Mathias Bähr; Mareike Kirsch; Ilko Maier; Daniel Behme; Christian Heiner Riedel; Marios-Nikos Psychogios; Alex Brehm; Jan Liman; Christine A F von Arnim Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Caglar Cosarderelioglu; Lolita S Nidadavolu; Claudene J George; Esther S Oh; David A Bennett; Jeremy D Walston; Peter M Abadir Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Nicholas R Evans; Oliver M Todd; Jatinder S Minhas; Patricia Fearon; George W Harston; Jonathan Mant; Gillian Mead; Jonathan Hewitt; Terence J Quinn; Elizabeth A Warburton Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 5.266