Adinda P Derkx1, Daryl J Mares2. 1. School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia. adinda.derkx@adelaide.edu.au. 2. School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.
Abstract
MAIN CONCLUSION: Late-maturity α-amylase (LMA) expression in wheat grains can be induced by either a cool temperature shock close to physiological maturity or continuous cool maximum temperatures during grain development. Late-maturity α-amylase (LMA) is a genetic trait in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) involving the production of α-amylase during grain development, which can result in an unacceptably low Falling Number (FN) in mature grain and consequent grain downgrading. Comparison of the FN test, an α-amylase activity assay and a high pI α-amylase-specific ELISA on the same meal samples gave equivalent results; ELISA was used for further experiments because of its isoform specificity. A cool temperature shock during the middle stages of grain development is known to induce LMA and is used for phenotypic screening. It was determined that a cool temperature treatment of seven days was required to reliably induce LMA. Glasshouse studies performed in summer and winter demonstrated that temperature affected the timing of sensitivity to cool-shock by altering the rate and duration of grain development, but that the sensitive grain developmental stage was unchanged at 35-45% moisture content. Wheat varieties with Rht-B1b or Rht-D1b dwarfing genes responded to a cool-shock only from mid grain filling until physiological maturity, whilst genotypes with Rht8c or without a dwarfing gene expressed LMA in response to a cool-shock during a wider developmental range. A continuous cool maximum temperature regimen (23 °C/15 °C day/night) during grain development also resulted in LMA expression and showed a stronger association with field expression than the cool-shock treatment. These results clarify how genotype, temperature and grain developmental stage determine LMA expression, and allow for the improvement of LMA phenotypic screening methods.
MAIN CONCLUSION: Late-maturity α-amylase (LMA) expression in wheat grains can be induced by either a cool temperature shock close to physiological maturity or continuous cool maximum temperatures during grain development. Late-maturity α-amylase (LMA) is a genetic trait in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) involving the production of α-amylase during grain development, which can result in an unacceptably low Falling Number (FN) in mature grain and consequent grain downgrading. Comparison of the FN test, an α-amylase activity assay and a high pI α-amylase-specific ELISA on the same meal samples gave equivalent results; ELISA was used for further experiments because of its isoform specificity. A cool temperature shock during the middle stages of grain development is known to induce LMA and is used for phenotypic screening. It was determined that a cool temperature treatment of seven days was required to reliably induce LMA. Glasshouse studies performed in summer and winter demonstrated that temperature affected the timing of sensitivity to cool-shock by altering the rate and duration of grain development, but that the sensitive grain developmental stage was unchanged at 35-45% moisture content. Wheat varieties with Rht-B1b or Rht-D1b dwarfing genes responded to a cool-shock only from mid grain filling until physiological maturity, whilst genotypes with Rht8c or without a dwarfing gene expressed LMA in response to a cool-shock during a wider developmental range. A continuous cool maximum temperature regimen (23 °C/15 °C day/night) during grain development also resulted in LMA expression and showed a stronger association with field expression than the cool-shock treatment. These results clarify how genotype, temperature and grain developmental stage determine LMA expression, and allow for the improvement of LMA phenotypic screening methods.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dwarfing genes; Falling number; Grain filling; High pI α-amylase; Reduced height (Rht); Triticum aestivum
Authors: Jose M Barrero; Kolumbina Mrva; Mark J Talbot; Rosemary G White; Jennifer Taylor; Frank Gubler; Daryl J Mares Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: J Peng; D E Richards; N M Hartley; G P Murphy; K M Devos; J E Flintham; J Beales; L J Fish; A J Worland; F Pelica; D Sudhakar; P Christou; J W Snape; M D Gale; N P Harberd Journal: Nature Date: 1999-07-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Richard Casebow; Caroline Hadley; Rajneet Uppal; Molla Addisu; Stefano Loddo; Ania Kowalski; Simon Griffiths; Mike Gooding Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marcus Newberry; Alexander B Zwart; Alex Whan; Jos C Mieog; May Sun; Emmett Leyne; Jenifer Pritchard; Sergio Nicolas Daneri-Castro; Kutty Ibrahim; Dean Diepeveen; Crispin A Howitt; Jean-Philippe F Ral Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 5.753