Literature DB >> 31950268

Peri-operative prognostic factors for primary skull base chordomas: results from a single-center cohort.

Emanuele La Corte1,2, Morgan Broggi3, Alberto Raggi4, Silvia Schiavolin4, Francesco Acerbi3, Giovanni Danesi5, Mariangela Farinotti6, Giovanni Felisati7, Alberto Maccari7, Bianca Pollo8, Marco Saini3, Claudia Toppo4, Francesca Valvo9, Riccardo Ghidoni10,11, Maria Grazia Bruzzone12, Francesco DiMeco3, Paolo Ferroli3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skull base chordomas (SBC) are rare malignant tumors and few factors have been found to be reliable markers for clinical decision making and survival prognostication. The aim of the present work was to identify specific prognostic factors potentially useful for the management of SBC patients.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all the patients diagnosed and treated for SBC at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta" between January 1992 and December 2017 has been performed. Survival analysis was performed and a logistic regression model was used. Statistically significant predictors were rated based on their log odds in order to preliminarily build a personalized grading scale-the Peri-Operative Chordoma Scale (POCS).
RESULTS: Fifty-nine primary chordoma patients were included. The average follow-up from the first treatment was 82.6 months (95% CI, 65.5-99.7). POCS was built over PFS and MR contrast enhancement (intense vs mild/no, value 4), preoperative motor deficit (yes vs no, value 3), and the development of any postoperative complications (yes vs no, value 2). POCS ranges between 0 and 9, with higher scores being associated with reduced likelihood of survival and progression-free state.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that preoperative clinical symptoms (motor deficits), surgical features (extent of tumor resection and surgeon's experience), development of postoperative complications, and KPS decline represent significant prognostic factors. The degree of MR contrast enhancement significantly correlated to both OS and PFS. We also preliminarily developed the POCS as a prognostic grading scale which may help neurosurgeons in the personalized management of patients undergoing potential adjuvant therapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chordoma; Clivus; Complication; Endoscopic endonasal approach; Grading system; Outcome; Skull base; Skull base surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31950268     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04219-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  43 in total

1.  The LANSS Pain Scale: the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs.

Authors:  M Bennett
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Clival chordomas: A pathological, surgical, and radiotherapeutic review.

Authors:  Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Paul A Gardner; Carl H Snyderman; Kenneth O Devaney; William M Mendenhall; Carlos Suárez; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Predicting functional impairment in brain tumor surgery: the Big Five and the Milan Complexity Scale.

Authors:  Paolo Ferroli; Morgan Broggi; Silvia Schiavolin; Francesco Acerbi; Valentina Bettamio; Dario Caldiroli; Alberto Cusin; Emanuele La Corte; Matilde Leonardi; Alberto Raggi; Marco Schiariti; Sergio Visintini; Angelo Franzini; Giovanni Broggi
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Current surgical outcomes for cranial base chordomas: cohort study of 95 patients.

Authors:  Salvatore Di Maio; Robert Rostomily; Laligam N Sekhar
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Predictors of recurrence following resection of intracranial chordomas.

Authors:  Winward Choy; Sergei Terterov; Tania B Kaprealian; Andy Trang; Nolan Ung; Antonio DeSalles; Lawrance K Chung; Neil Martin; Michael Selch; Marvin Bergsneider; Harry V Vinters; William H Yong; Isaac Yang
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 1.961

7.  Skull base chordomas: clinical outcome in a consecutive series of 45 patients with long-term follow-up and evaluation of clinical and biological prognostic factors.

Authors:  Nicola Boari; Filippo Gagliardi; Andrea Cavalli; Marco Gemma; Luca Ferrari; Paola Riva; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Endoscopic endonasal approach in the management of skull base chordomas--clinical experience on a large series, technique, outcome, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Salvatore Chibbaro; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Sebastien Froelich; Leonardo Tigan; Pierre Kehrli; Christian Debry; Antonio Romano; Philippe Herman; Bernard George; Damien Bresson
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 9.  Chordoma.

Authors:  Paolo G Casali; Silvia Stacchiotti; Claudia Sangalli; Patrizia Olmi; Alessandro Gronchi
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.645

10.  Converging paths to progress for skull base chordoma: Review of current therapy and future molecular targets.

Authors:  Salvatore Di Maio; Esther Kong; Stephen Yip; Robert Rostomily
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-06-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Differences in stromal component of chordoma are associated with contrast enhancement in MRI and differential gene expression in RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Mina Park; Inho Park; Chang-Ki Hong; Se Hoon Kim; Yoon Jin Cha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Factors associated with artificial airway retention after skull base chordoma resection: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yuxuan Fu; Yun Yu; Yidan Cui; Jing Wang; Bo Ma; Minyu Jian; Jingxin Yao; Longnian Jing; Jiwei Bai; Ruquan Han
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  Neurosurgery outcomes and complications in a monocentric 7-year patient registry.

Authors:  Johannes Sarnthein; Victor E Staartjes; Luca Regli
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-01-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.