Effect of polymer and glass physicochemical properties on MS2 recovery from food contact surfaces.

Viruses are transmissible via their interaction with contact surfaces of food containers or tools. This study evaluated the recoveries of MS2 coliphage, a virus surrogate, from polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene (PE), and glass (borosilicate and soda lime), as influenced by the surface chemistry and topography. MS2 (5-6 logs) in PBS with 1% TSB was inoculated onto each of 9 different surfaces, 24-h cold-incubated, and recovery was quantified by infectivity. The order of MS2 recovery efficiency from smooth surfaces was PP > PE ≥ soda lime glass, which classified into 3 ANOVA groups, p = 0.05. The MS2 recovery ratios of smooth vs. rough surfaces were 1.4-1.5. Atomic force microscopy revealed 21-nm diam pinholes (<28-nm of MS2 size) in the borosilicate glass. The lowest and highest MS2 recoveries among the 9 surfaces were demonstrated by the hole-bearing borosilicate glass (34 ± 8%) and smooth PP (69 ± 14%) respectively. Generally greater MS2 recovery was obtained from smooth PP and PE surfaces compared to glass, but topographic alterations (pinholes or increased roughness) decreased recovery possibly by trapping the viruses.