| Literature DB >> 31948076 |
Yu-Ting Bai1,2, Xue-Bo Jin1,2, Xiao-Yi Wang1,2, Xiao-Kai Wang3, Ji-Ping Xu1,2.
Abstract
Pollutant analysis and pollution source tracing are critical issues in air quality management, in which correlation analysis is important for pollutant relation modeling. A dynamic correlation analysis method was proposed to meet the real-time requirement in atmospheric management. Firstly, the spatio-temporal analysis framework was designed, in which the process of data monitoring, correlation calculation, and result presentation were defined. Secondly, the core correlation calculation method was improved with an adaptive data truncation and grey relational analysis. Thirdly, based on the general framework and correlation calculation, the whole algorithm was proposed for various analysis tasks in time and space, providing the data basis for ranking and decision on pollutant effects. Finally, experiments were conducted with the practical data monitored in an industrial park of Hebei Province, China. The different pollutants in multiple monitoring stations were analyzed crosswise. The dynamic features of the results were obtained to present the variational correlation degrees from the proposed and contrast methods. The results proved that the proposed dynamic correlation analysis could quickly acquire atmospheric pollution information. Moreover, it can help to deduce the influence relation of pollutants in multiple locations.Entities:
Keywords: air pollution management; correlation degree; pollutant source tracing; spatio-temporal analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31948076 PMCID: PMC6981785 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Framework of spatio-temporal correlation analysis on atmospheric pollutants.
Figure 2Flow chart of dynamic spatio-temporal correlation algorithm.
Figure 3Distribution of air monitoring points. HS: HengShui station.
Variable and point selected as the analysis object of multidimensional correlation.
| Point No.1 | Point No.2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | SO2 | PM2.5 | CO | ||
| Point No.1 | PM2.5 | ★ | |||
| SO2 | ★ | ||||
| Point No.2 | PM2.5 | ★ | |||
| CO | ★ | ||||
★: The related matric elements will be analyzed.
Figure 4Correlation degree between PM2.5 and PM10, CO, temperature, humidity. Temperature and humidity are abbreviated as Tem and Hum, respectively.
Figure 5Correlation degrees by different methods.
Figure 6Correlation degree deviation between dynamic and static methods.
Figure 7Cross-correlation degree of any two monitoring points at 4 moments.
Figure 8Correlation degrees between any two points.
Figure 9Correlation degrees between two points by contrast methods (data of July 2016).
Figure 10Correlation degrees of variable and point crosswise.
Figure 11Correlation degree deviation between dynamic and static methods of data in July 2016.
Information entropy of contrast methods in experiment 1 (Section 4.2.1).
| Period | FSW-GRA | ASW-PC | ASW-GRA |
|---|---|---|---|
| PM2.5-PM10 in July 2016 | 0.476 | 0.598 | 0.869 |
| PM2.5-temperature in December 2016 | 0.511 | 0.547 | 0.763 |
FSW-GRA: grey relational analysis with a fixed sliding window; ASW-PC: partial correlation with adaptive sliding window; ASW-GRA: the proposed method in this paper, namely gray relation analysis with adaptive sliding window.