| Literature DB >> 31948074 |
Bruno B Giudicelli1, Leonardo G O Luz1,2, Mustafa Sogut3, Alain G Massart2, Arnaldo C Júnior1, António J Figueiredo2.
Abstract
Young judo athletes are bio-banding based on age and body mass and compete in weight classes. The purposes of this study were to investigate the influences of maturation on physical performance in young judokas through controlling the chronological age and body mass, and to examine the mediating role of anthropometric variables. Sixty-seven judokas, aged 11.0-14.7, were measured for 11 anthropometric and seven physical performance variables. Pearson partial correlations were conducted to verify the relationship between the maturational indicator and the dependent variables. Mediation analyses were performed to identify the extent to which anthropometric variables mediate the relationship. The maturation effect remained on the aerobic capacity and handgrip strength (p < 0.05). Fat mass (b = 80.335, 95%CI 11.580-204.270) and fat-free mass (b = 108.256, 95%CI 39.508-207.606) totally mediated the effect on aerobic capacity. Fat mass (b = 0.023, 95%CI 0.004-0.057), fat-free mass (b = 0.029, 95%CI 0.011-0.058), stature (b = 0.031, 95%CI 0.008-0.061), arm span (b = 0.021, 95%CI 0.003-0.044), and inferior members length (b = 0.022, 95%CI 0.005-0.049) totally mediated the effect on handgrip strength. The effect of biological maturation is noticeable even after age and body mass control, being mediated by anthropometric variables related to body composition and size.Entities:
Keywords: bio-banding; biological maturation; combat sports; judo; mediation analysis; rapid weight loss
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31948074 PMCID: PMC6981667 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Descriptive statistics for the total sample and test of normality (n = 67).
| Variables | Range | Mean |
| Kolmogorov–Smirnov | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | Maximum | Value | 95%CI | Value |
| ||
| Chronological age (years) | 11.01 | 14.70 | 12.54 | 12.30–12.78 | 0.99 | - | - |
| Predicted mature stature (cm) | 161.9 | 198.3 | 182.6 | 180.2–184.3 | 7.2 | - | - |
| Attained PMS (%) | 77.0 | 94.0 | 84.4 | 83.2–85.5 | 4.7 | - | - |
| Training experience (years) | 1 | 9 | 3.33 | 2.74–3.91 | 2.40 | - | - |
| Body mass (kg) | 27.6 | 79.6 | 47.6 | 44.7–50.5 | 11.2 | 0.102 | 0.081 |
| Body Fat mass (kg) | 2.1 | 34.4 | 9.6 | 8.0–11.1 | 6.3 | 0.150 | <0.01 |
| Body Fat free mass (kg) | 25.5 | 65.1 | 38.0 | 36.1–39.9 | 7.8 | 0.099 | 0.173 |
| Stature (cm) | 134.8 | 176.5 | 154.0 | 151.6–156.4 | 9.9 | 0.075 | 0.200 |
| Sitting height (cm) | 71.5 | 93.2 | 80.0 | 78.8–81.2 | 5.1 | 0.078 | 0.200 |
| Arm span (cm) | 133.0 | 180.0 | 154.1 | 151.5–156.7 | 10.8 | 0.060 | 0.200 |
| Superior members length (cm) | 36.2 | 70.8 | 60.2 | 58.9–61.5 | 5.4 | 0.086 | 0.200 |
| Hand length (cm) | 14.1 | 21.3 | 16.9 | 16.5–17.2 | 1.5 | 0.074 | 0.200 |
| Inferior members length (cm) | 60.3 | 85.5 | 74.0 | 72.7–75.4 | 5.5 | 0.057 | 0.200 |
| Foot length (cm) | 20.1 | 29.0 | 24.4 | 24.0–24.9 | 2.0 | 0.098 | 0.185 |
| Arm circumference (cm) | 19.0 | 36.0 | 25.3 | 24.5–26.1 | 3.3 | 0.068 | 0.200 |
| Calf circumference (cm) | 27.0 | 40.1 | 32.6 | 31.8–33.4 | 3.3 | 0.071 | 0.200 |
| Pacer test (m) | 140 | 1740 | 757 | 680–835 | 318 | 0.094 | 0.200 |
| Line-drill test (s) * | 30.09 | 46.60 | 36.14 | 35.36–36.92 | 3.20 | 0.074 | 0.200 |
| Agility 10 × 5 shuttle run (s) * | 15.88 | 26.25 | 19.44 | 18.93–19.96 | 2.12 | 0.139 | <0.01 |
| 60-s sit-ups (count) | 15 | 61 | 41 | 39–44 | 10 | 0.089 | 0.200 |
| 2-kg ball throw (m) | 3.19 | 8.79 | 5.22 | 4.93–5.52 | 1.22 | 0.077 | 0.200 |
| Standing long jump (m) | 1.12 | 5.65 | 1.69 | 1.55–1.83 | 0.57 | 0.179 | <0.01 |
| Hand grip strength (kg) | 14.0 | 40.0 | 24.8 | 23.4–26.2 | 5.8 | 0.158 | <0.01 |
95%CI, confidence interval; sd, standard deviation; PMS, predicted mature stature; * in runtime tests, lower value represents better performance.
Partial correlation coefficients (controlling for chronological age and body mass) among biological maturity (given by the z-score of the attained %PMS), anthropometric, and physical variables; and partial correlation coefficients between aerobic performance and handgrip strength with anthropometric variables (n = 67).
| Variables | Biological Maturation | Physical Fitness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aerobic Performance | Handgrip Strength | ||
| Anthropometry | |||
| Body Fat mass (kg) # | −0.303 *** | −0.432 *** | −0.461 *** |
| Body Fat free mass (kg) | 0.387 ** | 0.451 *** | 0.453 *** |
| Stature (cm) | 0.497 *** | 0.305 * | 0.395 ** |
| Sitting height (cm) | 0.400 ** | 0.263 * | 0.322 ** |
| Arm span (cm) | 0.387 ** | 0.191 | 0.359 ** |
| Superior members length (cm) | 0.288 * | 0.116 | 0.296 * |
| Hand length (cm) | 0.236 | 0.352 ** | 0.247 * |
| Inferior members length (cm) | 0.443 *** | 0.258 * | 0.348 ** |
| Foot length (cm) | 0.103 | 0.260 * | 0.245 |
| Arm circumference (cm) | −0.168 | −0.040 | −0.200 |
| Calf circumference (cm) | −0.126 | −0.190 | −0.282 |
| Physical fitness | |||
| Pacer test (m) |
| ||
| Line-drill test (s) | −0.225 ## | ||
| Agility 10 × 5 shuttle run (s) # | −0.053 ## | ||
| 60-s sit-ups (count) | −0.069 | ||
| 2-kg ball throw (m) | 0.074 | ||
| Standing long jump (m) # | 0.217 | ||
| Hand grip strength (kg) # |
| ||
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; Bold – physical performance variables selected to have partial correlation with the anthropometry variables tested; # test was performed on log-transformed variable; ## in runtime tests, lower value represents better performance.
Figure 1Models of body fat mass, body fat free mass, stature, arm span, and inferior members length mediation on the maturational effect on aerobic performance and handgrip strength. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; solid line, significant effect; dash line, non-significant effect.