| Literature DB >> 31948015 |
Rong Huang1, Xiuyan Guo1, Shiyue Ma1, Jixing Xie1, Jianzhong Xu1, Jing Ma1.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (Entities:
Keywords: MOF; epoxy resin; flame retardant; ionic liquid
Year: 2020 PMID: 31948015 PMCID: PMC7022461 DOI: 10.3390/polym12010108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Scheme 1Illustration of the synthesis of IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al) and the flame-retardant effect on EP.
Scheme 2The synthesis route of [DPP-NC3bim][PMo].
Figure 1XRD patterns of NH2-MIL-101(Al) and IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al).
Figure 2FT-IR patterns of IL, NH2-MIL-101(Al) and IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al).
Figure 313C NMR spectra (a) and 1H NMR spectra (b) of [NH2C3bim][Br].
Figure 4The XPS spectra (a) of IL, NH2-MIL-101(Al) and IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al) and the high-resolution XPS spectra of N 1s regions (b) of IL.
Figure 5SEM and TEM images of (a,c) NH2-MIL-101(Al) and (b,d) IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al).
Figure 6The N2 adsorption isotherm of NH2-MIL-101(Al) and IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al).
Figure 7SEM images of (a) EP, (b) EP/NH2-MIL-101(Al), and (c) EP/IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al).
EDS analysis of EP, EP/NH2-MIL-101(Al), and EP/IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al).
| Samples | Element | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP | C | N | O | |||
| EP/NH2-MIL-101(Al) | C | N | O | Al | ||
| EP/IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al) | C | N | O | Al | P | Mo |
Figure 8TG and DTG curves of EP and EP composites under N2 conditions.
TGA parameters of EP and EP composites.
| Samples | Nitrogen | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| EP | 363.2 | 377.8 | 11.2 |
| EP/NH2-MIL-101(Al) | 351.6 | 371.5 | 13.2 |
| EP/IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al) | 340.2 | 354.0 | 19.7 |
Figure 9HRR (a), SPR (b), THR (c), TSP (d), CO release rate (e), and TOC (f) curves of EP and EP composites.
Cone calorimeter data of EP and EP composites.
| Samples | TTI | PHRR | THR | SPR | TSP | COP | TOC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP | 63 | 1201.31 | 119.05 | 0.37 | 37.86 | 0.029 | 78.77 |
| EP/NH2-MIL-101(Al) | 65 | 851.64 | 110.79 | 0.29 | 35.15 | 0.021 | 73.86 |
| EP/IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al) | 53 | 585.72 | 101.92 | 0.23 | 32.91 | 0.016 | 67.44 |
The flame-retardant effect of some other phosphorus-nitrogen-containing materials.
| Flame Retardant | Re-PHRR (%) | Re-TSP (%) | Re-COP (%) | Content (wt. %) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMAIL | 31.00 | 15.41 | 22.50 | 6 | [ |
| IDOP | 5.02 | 13.90 | 26.98 | 5 | [ |
| PBHDDP | 19.13 | 0.40 | ----- | 12 | [ |
| DHBAP | 26.30 | 60.90 | −70.30 | 8 | [ |
| PBFA | 26.92 | 48.05 | ----- | 9 | [ |
| TGD | 22.04 | 2.10 | −0.15 | 3 | [ |
| IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al) | 51.24 | 13.07 | 44.83 | 3 | Our work |
Abbreviation: re-PHRR: the percentage of the PHRR reduction of the flame retardant compared to the neat epoxy. re-TSP: the percentage of the TSP reduction of the flame retardant compared to the neat epoxy. re-COP: the percentage of the COP reduction of the flame retardant compared to the neat epoxy.
Figure 10SEM images of the char residues of EP (a,a’), EP/NH2-MIL-101(Al) (b,b’), and EP/IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al) (c,c’).
Figure 11Raman spectra of char residues of EP (a), EP/NH2-MIL-101(Al) (b), and EP/IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al) (c) after the cone calorimeter test.
Scheme 3Schematic illustration of the proposed mechanism of EP/ IL@NH2-MIL-101(Al).