Literature DB >> 3194797

The surgical management of cervical spinal stenosis, spondylosis, and myeloradiculopathy by means of the posterior approach.

J A Epstein1.   

Abstract

No firm statistical evidence exists establishing the superiority of the anterior or the posterior approach in the management of spondylostenosis, although some sense of order is evolving. In general the consensus suggests that in spondylostenosis, the anterior approach may be preferred for disc or segmental osteophyte intrusions limited to one or two levels. Laminectomy is the preferred procedure in patients with a narrowed canal and multiple level involvement. The surgeon's personal preference and experience remains the dominant factor. Patients with congenital stenosis involving all of the major segments, with or without superimposed developmental changes, require more extensive laminar decompression with proper attention to the craniocervical junction where anomalies may occur. The success of laminectomy is dictated by the preservation of cervical lordosis. In patients with major dorsally located abnormalities such as hyperlordosis, shingling, and arthrosis with hypertrophy of the yellow ligaments, posterior decompression is essential. Subsequent stabilization is rarely required with proper surgical and postoperative care. Both an anterior and posterior approach may be indicated in unique circumstances of spondylostenosis complicated by subluxation and instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3194797     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198807000-00031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Cervical spine: degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Andrew G Todd
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

2.  Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases.

Authors:  Mihir R Bapat; Kshitij Chaudhary; Amit Sharma; Vinod Laheri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  R Braakman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of cervical kyphosis.

Authors:  Ke Han; Chang Lu; Jing Li; Guang-Zhong Xiong; Bing Wang; Guo-Hua Lv; You-Wen Deng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Full endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of the cervical spine: surgical technique and early experience.

Authors:  Daniel A Carr; Isaac Josh Abecassis; Christoph P Hofstetter
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06

7.  Analysis of the outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, undergone canal expansive laminoplasty supported with instrumentation in a group of Indian population - a prospective study.

Authors:  Subhadip Mandal; U Banerjee; A S Mukherjee; Subhajyoti Mandal; Srikanta Kundu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-29

Review 8.  Cervical spondylosis. An update.

Authors:  B M McCormack; P R Weinstein
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug

9.  Laminoplasty techniques for the treatment of multilevel cervical stenosis.

Authors:  Lance K Mitsunaga; Eric O Klineberg; Munish C Gupta
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-03-06

Review 10.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review of surgical indications and decision making.

Authors:  M D Law; M Bernhardt; A A White
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1993 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.