Literature DB >> 3194796

Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

A A White1, M M Panjabi.   

Abstract

Based on a review of previous studies and our opinion, biomechanical considerations suggest the following guidelines for the surgical management of CSM. It is not recommended that the dura mater, the pia mater, and the dentate ligaments be transected in the surgical treatment of CSM. Anterior decompression and fusion, preferably with the Smith-Robinson technique, is recommended for patients with anterior impingement of the spinal cord at one or two levels in the absence of a narrow spinal canal. This procedure is also advantageous when there is significant radiculopathy associated with the level(s) of pathology. Posterior decompression is recommended when there are three or more levels involved, and particularly when there is developmental stenosis of the canal, ie, a DAD below 13 mm and a SAD below 11 mm. Laminectomy and laminoplasty for CSM may not be any different as regards surgical outcome. One well-controlled study showed only one difference, a decrease in the ability of the laminoplasty patients to extend the neck. If there is evidence of instability or a potential for it, posterior decompression procedures should be accompanied by a facet fusion, or in the case of laminoplasty, some fusion modification such as that described by Itoh and Tsuji. There may also be circumstances in which significant multilevel anterior spur formation and compression in association with a stenotic canal should be treated with anterior and posterior surgery with appropriate attention to maintaining adequate stability. The advantages and disadvantages of these various surgical procedures and their relative appropriateness in various clinical situations will be gradually clarified through well-designed and executed laboratory and clinical investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3194796     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198807000-00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

1.  Predicted cervical canal enlargement and effective cord decompression following expansive laminoplasty using cervical magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mohd Imran Yusof; Eskandar Hassan; Shafie Abdullah
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases.

Authors:  Mihir R Bapat; Kshitij Chaudhary; Amit Sharma; Vinod Laheri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Long-term follow-up of clinical and radiological outcome after cervical laminectomy.

Authors:  Sarita van Geest; Anouk M J de Vormer; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not influence surgical results of laminoplasty in elderly cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients.

Authors:  Hideki Shigematsu; Yurito Ueda; Toshichika Takeshima; Munehisa Koizumi; Nobuhisa Satoh; Hiroaki Matsumori; Takuya Oshima; Masato Tanaka; Atsuo Kugai; Yoshinori Takakura; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Evaluation of corticospinal excitability in cervical myelopathy, before and after surgery, with transcranial magnetic stimulation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Alessia Nicotra; Nicolas K K King; Maria Catley; Nigel Mendoza; Alison H McGregor; Paul H Strutton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Lordotic alignment and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  H Baba; K Uchida; Y Maezawa; N Furusawa; M Azuchi; S Imura
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  T-laminoplasty--a surgical approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Technical note.

Authors:  C Hamburger
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Degenerative cervical spinal stenosis: current strategies in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Frerk Meyer; Wolfgang Börm; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 9.  Cervical spondylosis. An update.

Authors:  B M McCormack; P R Weinstein
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug

10.  Severe facet joint arthrosis caused c7/t1 myelopathy: a case report.

Authors:  Toshimi Aizawa; Hiroshi Ozawa; Takeshi Hoshikawa; Takashi Kusakabe; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2009-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.