| Literature DB >> 31947856 |
Martina Pérez Serrano1,2,3, Andrés José García1,2,3, Tomás Landete-Castillejos1,2,3, Jamil Cappelli1,2,3, José Ángel Gómez2,3, Francisco Hidalgo2,3, Laureano Gallego1,2,3.
Abstract
: This study describes the effects that Cu supplementation of late-gestating and lactating females (hinds) of Iberian red deer fed a balanced diet have on milk production, composition, and somatic cell count (SCC). Experimental hinds (n = 9) were subcutaneously injected every 42 days with Cu (0.83 mg Cu/kg body weight) from day 202 of gestation until the end of lactation (week 18). Control hinds (n = 8) were injected with a physiological saline solution with the same volume and at the same frequency as the experimental group. Copper supplementation decreased the SCC from 1.64 to 1.36 log 10/mL (p = 0.003) and modified the milk mineral profile. In particular, milk from hinds supplemented with Cu had more Ca (p = 0.02), Mg (p = 0.06), and K (p = 0.03) than milk from control hinds. However, Cu supplementation did not influence the Cu content of milk. Therefore, it can be concluded that Cu supplementation of hinds fed a balanced diet from late-gestation to the end of lactation could be a good strategy to reduce SCC and modify the mineral profile of milk increasing its Ca content.Entities:
Keywords: Cu supply; Iberian hinds; lactation stage; milk nutrient; milk production; offspring growth
Year: 2020 PMID: 31947856 PMCID: PMC7022862 DOI: 10.3390/ani10010083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Effects of parenteral Cu supplementation 1 of late-gestating and lactating Iberian red deer hinds fed a balanced diet on body weight (BW) of hind and offspring and body condition score (BCS) of hind and total yields. Data are means ± standard error of mean 2.
| Item | Cu Supplementation | Control |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Hind BW (kg) | |||
| First Cu injection 3 | 105.2 ± 2.25 | 110.3 ± 2.72 | 0.17 |
| Before calving 4 | 120.9 ± 2.09 | 125.5 ± 2.95 | 0.21 |
| BW change 5 | 15.7 ± 1.22 | 15.3 ± 0.59 | 0.79 |
| After calving 4 | 106.3 ± 1.98 | 110.8 ± 3.99 | 0.31 |
| BW change 6 | −14.6 ± 1.03 | −14.7 ± 1.30 | 0.94 |
| Hind BCS | |||
| First Cu injection 3 | 3.64 ± 0.073 | 3.78 ± 0.137 | 0.36 |
| Before calving 4 | 3.94 ± 0.037 | 3.97 ± 0.099 | 0.81 |
| BCS change 5 | 0.31 ± 0.056 | 0.19 ± 0.078 | 0.23 |
| After calving 4 | 3.86 ± 0.061 | 3.97 ± 0.137 | 0.47 |
| BCS change 6 | −0.08 ± 0.059 | 0.00 ± 0.047 | 0.30 |
| Offspring BW (kg) | |||
| Birth | 8.08 ± 0.410 | 8.55 ± 0.471 | 0.46 |
| Weaning | 51.7 ± 1.13 | 51.7 ± 3.33 | 0.99 |
| BW change 7 | 43.6 ± 1.13 | 43.1 ± 3.24 | 0.88 |
| Offspring relative BW gain (%) 8 | 553.7 ± 37.36 | 514.1 ± 43.76 | 0.50 |
| Total yields | |||
| Milk (L) | 290.8 ± 22.64 | 315.7 ± 27.9 | 0.50 |
| Fat (kg) | 29.8 ± 2.53 | 31.0 ± 2.35 | 0.73 |
| Protein (kg) | 21.1 ± 1.73 | 22.5 ± 1.98 | 0.59 |
| Lactose (kg) | 13.2 ± 1.10 | 14.0 ± 1.27 | 0.66 |
| Dry matter (kg) | 71.1 ± 5.67 | 75.5 ± 6.14 | 0.61 |
1 Provided by subcutaneous injections containing 0.83 mg of Cu per kg BW. 2 The experimental unit was the animal (n = 9 for Cu supplemented group and n = 8 for control group). In addition, fat, protein, lactose, and dry matter concentrations were computed as the mean of the two aliquot replicates from each milking. 3 At the beginning of the trial at day 202 of gestation. 4 Measures 3.5 days before and 3.5 days after calving (±1 day in both cases). 5 Difference between measures collected before calving and the first Cu injection. 6 Difference between measures collected after and before of calving. 7 From birth to weaning. 8 Calves BW gains from birth to weaning expressed as a percent relative to calf birth BW.
Effects of parenteral Cu supplementation 1 of late-gestating and lactating Iberian red deer hinds fed a balanced diet on body weight (BW) of hind and offspring throughout lactation, daily milk production (DMP), milk composition, gross energy content of fresh milk (GEFM), total daily gross energy content (TDGE), and somatic cell count (SCC). Data are means ± standard error of mean 2.
| Item | Cu Supplementation | Control |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Hind BW (kg) | 107.3 ± 0.96 | 109.2 ± 1.44 | 0.28 |
| Offspring BW (kg) | 31.0 ± 1.85 | 31.9 ± 2.02 | 0.08 |
| DMP (mL/day) | 2303 ± 108.6 | 2535 ± 159.7 | 0.49 |
| Milk composition | |||
| Fat (%) | 10.0 ± 0.29 | 9.8 ± 0.30 | 0.36 |
| Protein (%) | 7.0 ± 0.07 | 7.0 ± 0.09 | 0.41 |
| Protein:fat ratio | 0.72 ± 0.018 | 0.73 ± 0.018 | 0.56 |
| Lactose (%) | 4.4 ± 0.05 | 4.3 ± 0.07 | 0.23 |
| Dry matter (%) | 23.7 ± 0.30 | 23.4 ± 0.33 | 0.16 |
| Macro minerals (%) | |||
| Ca | 0.28 ± 0.013 | 0.24 ± 0.011 | 0.02 |
| P | 0.21 ± 0.008 | 0.19 ± 0.009 | 0.40 |
| Mg | 0.020 ± 0.0010 | 0.017 ± 0.0007 | 0.06 |
| Na | 0.044 ± 0.0020 | 0.046 ± 0.0017 | 0.55 |
| S | 0.069 ± 0.0029 | 0.063 ± 0.0023 | 0.10 |
| K | 0.17 ± 0.0066 | 0.15 ± 0.0044 | 0.03 |
| Trace minerals (ppm) | |||
| Cu | 0.35 ± 0.046 | 0.37 ± 0.044 | 0.90 |
| Fe | 1.83 ± 0.150 | 1.81 ± 0.181 | 0.98 |
| Mn | 1.14 ± 0.045 | 1.05 ± 0.035 | 0.12 |
| Sr | 3.35 ± 0.195 | 2.61 ± 0.181 | 0.001 |
| Rb | 1.11 ± 0.065 | 0.98 ± 0.044 | 0.10 |
| Zn | 11.4 ± 0.66 | 11.3 ± 0.99 | 0.96 |
| GEFM (kcal/kg) | 1609 ± 0.03 | 1582 ± 0.03 | 0.34 |
| TDGE (kcal/day) | 3642 ± 161.5 | 3922 ± 226,3 | 0.79 |
| SCC (log 10/mL) | 1.35 ± 0.277 | 1.63 ± 0.375 | 0.003 |
1 Provided by subcutaneous injections containing 0.83 mg of Cu per kg BW. 2 The experimental unit was the animal (n = 9 for Cu supplemented group and n = 8 for control group per lactation week). In addition, fat, protein, lactose, and dry matter concentrations were computed as the mean of the two aliquot replicates from each milking. 3 Statistical analyses considered only the effects of Cu supplementation and lactation week because their interaction was not significant for any traits.
Effects of lactation week on body weight (BW) of hind and offspring, daily milk production (DMP), milk composition, gross energy content of fresh milk (GEFM), total daily gross energy content (TDGE), and somatic cell count (SCC) of Iberian red deer hinds fed a balanced diet. Data are means ± standard error of mean 1.
| Item | 2 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 18 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hind BW (kg) | 106.4 ± 1.96 | 108.0 ± 2.06 | 108.9 ± 2.13 | 110.0 ± 2.12 | 109.6 ± 2.28 | 106.5 ± 2.04 | 0.73 |
| Offspring BW (kg) | 15.2 f ± 0.59 | 19.6 e ± 0.63 | 24.1 d ± 0.66 | 33.9 c ± 0.84 | 43.8 b ± 1.18 | 51.7 a ± 1.62 | <0.001 |
| DMP (mL/day) | 3140 a ± 269.6 | 2832 a ± 263.7 | 2715 a ± 211.1 | 2098 b ± 139.2 | 2108 b ± 109.4 | 1582 b ± 132.5 | <0.001 |
| Milk composition | |||||||
| Fat (%) | 8.6 c ± 0.20 | 8.5 c ± 0.38 | 8.8 c ± 0.29 | 9.9 b ± 0.33 | 11.4 a ± 0.45 | 12.3 a ± 0.51 | <0.001 |
| Protein (%) | 6.6 d ± 0.07 | 6.7 cd ± 0.13 | 6.7 cd ± 0.06 | 7.0 bc ± 0.09 | 7.2 b ± 0.11 | 7.7 a ± 0.16 | <0.001 |
| Protein:fat | 0.78 ab ± 0.019 | 0.81 a ± 0.041 | 0.78 ab ± 0.028 | 0.72 bc ± 0.025 | 0.64 c ± 0.022 | 0.64 c ± 0.019 | <0.001 |
| Lactose (%) | 4.1 b ± 0.06 | 4.3 ab ± 0.16 | 4.3 ab ± 0.08 | 4.6 a ± 0.07 | 4.3 ab ± 0.08 | 4.5 a ± 0.10 | <0.001 |
| Dry matter (%) | 21.9 d ± 0.19 | 22.2 cd ± 0.38 | 22.8 cd ± 0.27 | 23.6 bc ± 0.33 | 24.8 ab ± 0.50 | 26.1 a ± 0.62 | <0.001 |
| GEFM (kcal/kg) | 1462 d ± 0.02 | 1406 d ± 0.03 | 1486 d ± 0.02 | 1597 c ± 0.03 | 1735 b ± 0.04 | 1838 a ± 0.05 | <0.001 |
| TDGE (kcal/day) | 4603 a ± 411.5 | 4146 ab ± 415.2 | 4033 ab ± 321.3 | 3346 bc ± 227.0 | 3641 bc ± 184.8 | 2873 c ± 237.6 | 0.005 |
| SCC (log 10/mL) | 1.64 a ± 0.336 | 1.46 a ± 0.476 | 1.58 a ± 0.386 | 1.31 c ± 0.282 | 1.34 c ± 0.252 | 1.53 b ± 0.270 | 0.02 |
a–f Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05). 1 The experimental unit was the animal (n = 17 per week). In addition, fat, protein, lactose, and dry matter concentrations were computed as the mean of the two aliquot replicates from each milking.
Effects of lactation week on milk mineral composition of Iberian red deer hinds fed a balanced diet. Data are means ± standard error of mean 1.
| Item | 2 | 4 | 14 | 18 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macro minerals (%) | |||||
| Ca | 0.28 ± 0.014 | 0.26 ± 0.017 | 0.23 ± 0.019 | 0.27 ± 0.018 | 0.21 |
| P | 0.18 ± 0.011 | 0.19 ± 0.009 | 0.22 ± 0.012 | 0.23 ± 0.012 | 0.08 |
| Mg | 0.019 ± 0.001 | 0.017 ± 0.001 | 0.017 ± 0.001 | 0.021 ± 0.001 | 0.05 |
| Na | 0.04 ± 0.002 | 0.04 ± 0.003 | 0.05 ± 0.003 | 0.05 ± 0.002 | 0.50 |
| S | 0.07 ± 0.003 | 0.06 ± 0.004 | 0.07 ± 0.004 | 0.07 ± 0.004 | 0.12 |
| K | 0.16 ± 0.007 | 0.17 ± 0.010 | 0.15 ± 0.007 | 0.15 ± 0.008 | 0.19 |
| Trace minerals (ppm) | |||||
| Cu | 0.47 ± 0.083 | 0.35 ± 0.051 | 0.31 ± 0.061 | 0.30 ± 0.036 | 0.21 |
| Fe | 1.42 b ± 0.143 | 2.34 a ± 0.256 | 1.43 b ± 0.154 | 2.01 ab ± 0.225 | 0.004 |
| Mn | 1.13 ab ± 0.044 | 1.02 b ± 0.055 | 1.03 b ± 0.058 | 1.27 a ± 0.053 | 0.010 |
| Sr | 3.65 a ± 0.293 | 3.05 ab ± 0.192 | 2.44 b ± 0.281 | 2.81 ab ± 0.300 | 0.003 |
| Rb | 0.98 ± 0.074 | 1.16 ± 0.090 | 1.04 ± 0.067 | 0.98 ± 0.080 | 0.33 |
| Zn | 11.6 ab ± 0.42 | 9.55 b ± 0.819 | 11.0 b ± 1.46 | 15.5 a ± 0.796 | 0.007 |
a–b Means within a row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05). 1 The experimental unit was the animal (n = 17 per week).