| Literature DB >> 31947756 |
Yanjie Wu1, Yingrui Sui1, Wenjie He1, Fancong Zeng1, Zhanwu Wang1, Fengyou Wang1, Bin Yao2, Lili Yang1.
Abstract
Cation substitution is a promising approach to reduce the antisite defects and further improve the efficiency of Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) cells. In this paper, silver (Ag) has been introduced into Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) thin film to replace Cu partially and form (Cu1-xAgx)2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) (CAZTSSe) alloy films by combination of solution method and a rapid annealing technique. The fundamental properties of the mixed Ag-Cu kesterite compound are systematically reported as a function of the Ag/(Ag+Cu) ratio. The results show that band gap of kesterite CAZTSSe is incessantly increased by adjusting the Ag doping content, indicating that the CAZTSSe alloy film is a potentially applicable bandgap grading absorption layers material to obtain higher CZTSSe device. Furthermore, CAZTSSe alloy films with better electrical performance were also obtained by adjusting the Ag content during film fabrication. Finally, we also observed an increment in open circuit voltage (Voc) by 160 mV and an accompanying rise in device efficiency from 4.24 to 5.95%. The improvement is correlated to the improved grain size and decreased antisite defects of Cu instead of Zn site (CuZn) in the lattice. The Voc enhancement evidences that the solution method is facile and viable to achieve proper cation substitution toward higher efficiency kesterite solar cells. In addition, the CAZTSSe cell also displays better charge collection performance because of the higher fill factor (FF) and power conversion efficiency (PCE). Therefore, it can be concluded that the doping of Ag is a potentially appropriate method to reduce the Cuzn antisite defects of CZTSSe and improve efficiency of CZTSSe device.Entities:
Keywords: (Cu1-xAgx)2ZnSn(S,Se)4; antisite defects; photoelectric performance; solar cells; sol–gel; thin films
Year: 2020 PMID: 31947756 PMCID: PMC7023403 DOI: 10.3390/nano10010096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) X-ray diffractometer (XRD) spectra of CAZTSSe (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) alloy thin films. (b) Enlarged view of the corresponding (112) diffraction peaks of the CAZTSSe (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) alloy thin films. (c) The structure cell of the kesterite CAZTSSe. (d) Lattice parameters a and c for the CAZTSSe (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) alloy thin films.
Figure 2Variation in diffraction angle 2θ, the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and intensity of (112) peaks against various Ag contents for CAZTSSe (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4) alloy thin films.
Figure 3(a) Raman spectra of the CAZTSSe (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4) alloy thin films. (b) Enlarged view of the main Raman peaks of A1 mode for CAZTSSe (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4) alloy thin films.
Figure 4X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of (a) Cu 2p, (b) Zn 2p, (c) Sn 3d, (d) S 2p, (e) Se 3d, and (f) Ag 3d for the CZTSSe and CAZTSSe (x = 0.1) alloy thin films.
Summary of the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) results of CAZTSSe (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) thin films with various Ag contents.
| Sample | Cu (at%) | Zn (at%) | Sn (at%) | Ag (at%) | Se (at%) | S (at%) | (Ag+Cu)/Zn+Sn | Ag/(Cu+Ag) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 21.01 | 12.51 | 12.21 | 0.00 | 50.57 | 5.52 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
|
| 18.91 | 12.81 | 12.12 | 2.02 | 50.23 | 4.93 | 0.84 | 0.09 |
|
| 16.44 | 12.16 | 12.52 | 4.22 | 49.60 | 5.80 | 0.84 | 0.20 |
|
| 14.73 | 12.25 | 12.52 | 6.25 | 50.56 | 4.64 | 084 | 0.29 |
|
| 13.54 | 13.52 | 10.59 | 8.09 | 54.47 | 4.70 | 0.89 | 0.37 |
|
| 12.42 | 12.03 | 12.38 | 9.30 | 50.77 | 5.22 | 0.88 | 0.42 |
|
| 9.24 | 12.08 | 12.18 | 11.76 | 50.27 | 5.62 | 0.87 | 0.56 |
|
| 5.46 | 12.09 | 12.46 | 15.54 | 50.29 | 5.76 | 0.85 | 0.74 |
|
| 0.00 | 12.13 | 12.47 | 20.16 | 50.07 | 5.93 | 0.86 | 1.00 |
Figure 5Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (a–i) of the CAZTSSe (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) alloy thin films.
Figure 6Plot of (αhυ)2 against hυ for the CAZTSSe (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4) alloy thin films.
Figure 7The electrical properties including the resistivity (ρ), carrier concentration (n), and mobility (μ) of the CAZTSSe (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) alloy thin films.
Figure 8(a) The device schematic structure of CAZTSSe. (b–e) Device parameters statistics of the CZTSSe and CAZTSSe (x = 0.1) devices. (f) Current-voltage characteristics of the CZTSSe and CAZTSSe (x = 0.1) devices. (g) External quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra of the CZTSSe and CAZTSSe (x = 0.1) devices.
Parameters of the device performance.
| Device | Active Area | Voc | Jsc | FF | PCE | Rs | Rsh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.19 cm2 | 0.33 | 30.28 | 43 | 4.24 | 2.5 | 456.5 |
|
| 0.19 cm2 | 0.49 | 31.41 | 46 | 5.95 | 1.2 | 675.7 |