| Literature DB >> 31947668 |
Wei Dai1,2, Yimin Xia1, Bo Ning1, Mei Yang1.
Abstract
Safety and environmental protection are key issues in shield construction. Due to wear, the cutter of a shield machine must be changed after a period of excavation. In order to realize the tool change operation of a shield machine at atmospheric pressure, a method of cutter head freezing of the shield machine is described in this paper. The finite element simulation method is used to analyze the construction of a shield machine with a frozen cutter head in a composite stratum. For a composite stratum with uneven hard and soft layers in a ratio of 1:1, the stress and temperature fields are analyzed, and the stress change around the hob is recorded. Through numerical simulation, the change of the temperature field around the shield machine is determined in real time. As time goes on, the temperature around the shield machine decreases, and the frozen range expands. When the temperature field in a specific point reaches a critical value, the temperature at that point will remain constant, and the stress field around the cutter head will also tend to become stable. The isothermal region of the soil presents an annular distribution, and the final temperature tends to be stable and gradually increase as the distance from the frozen cutter head increases. The final temperature of the monitoring area reaches a stable value corresponding to -26.5 C°, the axial depth of the frozen wall is more than 2.5 m, the minimum frozen radius is 3.2 m, the stress distribution around the cutter head is unbalanced, the maximum stress is measured in the hard rock layer, and the stress around the cutter head at the hob level indicates that tool change is necessary. Compared with the traditional method, the construction method of a frozen cutter head is more effective and more environmentally friendly. Further research will allow a broad application of this method in shield excavation in a composite stratum.Entities:
Keywords: analysis of temperature field; composite stratum; frozen cutter head; tunnel construction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31947668 PMCID: PMC7014079 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Transformation of the cutterhead.
Figure 2Distribution of the frozen pipeline in the cutter head.
Figure 3Geometric model of the frozen soil system of the cutter head. (a): Geometric model of the cutter head; (b): Frozen soil system of the cutter head
Thermal physical and mechanical parameters of the soil.
| Temperature | Coefficient of Thermal Expansion | Thermal Conductivity(W/m·°C) | Specific Heat (J/Kg·°C) | Density | Modulus of Elasticity | Poisson’s Ratio | Tensile Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −30 | −9.6 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 1.43 × 108 | 0.28 | 2.35 × 104 |
| −28 | −9.6 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 1.34 × 108 | 0.29 | 2.25 × 104 |
| −26 | −9.5 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 1.25 × 108 | 0.29 | 2.15 × 104 |
| −24 | −9.4 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 1.1 × 108 | 0.29 | 2.08 × 104 |
| −22 | −9.4 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 1.0 × 108 | 0.29 | 1.96 × 104 |
| −20 | −9.3 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 9.8 × 107 | 0.3 | 1.88 × 104 |
| −18 | −9.3 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 9.0 × 107 | 0.3 | 1.80 × 104 |
| −16 | −9.2 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 8.2 × 107 | 0.3 | 1.74 × 104 |
| −14 | −9.2 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 7.3 × 107 | 0.3 | 1.65 × 104 |
| −12 | −9.1 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 6.3 × 107 | 0.3 | 1.55 × 104 |
| −10 | −9 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 5.4 × 107 | 0.3 | 1.45 × 104 |
| −8 | −8.8 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 4.3 × 107 | 0.31 | 1.35 × 104 |
| −6 | −8.5 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 3.2 × 107 | 0.31 | 1.25 × 104 |
| −4 | −8.5 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 2.8 × 107 | 0.34 | 1.00 × 104 |
| −2 | −8.4 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1640 | 2.0 × 107 | 0.37 | 4.80 × 103 |
| −1 | −6.6 × 10−5 | 5.25 | 34000 | 1710 | 1.5 × 107 | 0.39 | 3.50 × 103 |
| 0 | 0 | 4.2 | 880 | 1780 | 1.0 × 107 | 0.41 | 2.00 × 103 |
| 100 | 0 | 4.2 | 880 | 1780 | 1.0 × 107 | 0.41 | 2.00 × 103 |
Thermal physical and mechanical parameters of the rock.
| Temperature | Coefficient of Thermal Expansion | Thermal Conductivity (W/m·°C) | Specific Heat (J/Kg·°C) | Density | Modulus of Elasticity | Poisson’s Ratio | Tensile Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −30 | −5.5 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 7.15 × 108 | 0.32 | 2.35 × 104 |
| −28 | −5.4 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 6.7 × 108 | 0.33 | 2.25 × 104 |
| −26 | −5.4 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 6.25 × 108 | 0.33 | 2.15 × 104 |
| −24 | −5.3 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 5.5 × 108 | 0.33 | 2.08 × 104 |
| −22 | −5.2 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 5.0 × 108 | 0.33 | 1.96 × 104 |
| −20 | −5.2 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 4.9 × 108 | 0.34 | 1.88 × 104 |
| −18 | −5.1 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 4.5 × 108 | 0.34 | 1.80 × 104 |
| −16 | −5 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 4.1 × 108 | 0.34 | 1.74 × 104 |
| −14 | −4.8 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 3.65 × 108 | 0.34 | 1.65 × 104 |
| −12 | −4.8 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 3.15 × 108 | 0.34 | 1.55 × 104 |
| −10 | −4.7 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 2.7 × 108 | 0.34 | 1.45 × 104 |
| −8 | −4.5 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 2.15 × 108 | 0.35 | 1.35 × 104 |
| −6 | −4.4 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 1.6 × 108 | 0.35 | 1.25 × 104 |
| −4 | −4.3 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 1.4 × 108 | 0.38 | 1.00 × 104 |
| −2 | −4.1 × 10−5 | 6.3 | 810 | 1723 | 1.0 × 108 | 0.41 | 4.80 × 103 |
| −1 | −3.5 × 10−5 | 5.25 | 34000 | 1796 | 7.5 × 107 | 0.43 | 3.50 × 103 |
| 0 | −2.1 × 10−5 | 4.2 | 880 | 1870 | 5.0 × 107 | 0.45 | 2.00 × 103 |
| 100 | 0 | 4.2 | 880 | 1870 | 5.0 × 107 | 0.45 | 2.00 × 103 |
Figure 4Temperature field contours of the frozen soil around the cutter head.
Figure 5Temperature monitoring point and time-dependent curve of minimum soil temperature. (a): Temperature monitoring point; (b): time-dependent curve of minimum soil temperature.
Figure 6Stress field contours of the cutter head.
Figure 7Stress–time curve for the cutter head.
Figure 8Stress–time curve for the surface between the soft rock layer and the cutter head
Figure 9Stress–time curve for the surface between the hard rock layer and the cutter head.