| Literature DB >> 31947569 |
Meriem Latifi1,2, Azizan Ahmad1, Hamid Kaddami2, Nur Hasyareeda Hassan1, Reiner Dieden3, Youssef Habibi3.
Abstract
In the present work we report on the development of a novel and sustainable electrolyte based onEntities:
Keywords: Carboxymethylation; chitin; deacetylation; ionic liquid; solid polymer electrolyte
Year: 2020 PMID: 31947569 PMCID: PMC7023593 DOI: 10.3390/polym12010207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Reaction scheme for the carboxymethylation process on chitin.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of unmodified chitin and the different carboxymethylated derivatives obtained under different conditions.
Figure 313C CP-MAS (top) and 13C DP-MAS (bottom) NMR spectra of unmodified chitin and carboxymethylated derivatives obtained under different conditions (from top to bottom: chitin, CMChit_15, CMChit_30 and CMChit_45).
Observed 13C chemical shifts (ppm) in the CP/MAS NMR spectra for unmodified chitin and carboxymethylated derivatives obtained under different conditions. Attributions made according to Mi-Kyeong Jang et al. (Jang et al. 2004).
| Chemical Shift (ppm) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples | C1 | C2 | C3/C5 | C4 | C6 | CH3 | C = O * | C = O ** |
| Chitin | 105.2 | 57.8 | 75.46 | 83.5 | 59.9 | 24.0 | 164.8 | 174.8 |
| CMChit_15 | 108.7 | 61.5 | 78.7 | 87.4 | 64.8 | 27.4 | 168.3 | 180.2 |
| CMChit_30 | 108.6 | 61.5 | 78.7 | 87.4 | 64.8 | 27.2 | 168.3 | 180.7 |
| CMChit_45 | 108.6 | 61.3 | 78.6 | 87.4 | 64.8 | 27.4 | 168.4 | 180.6 |
C = O * acetyl, C = O ** Carboxymethyl.
Degree of substitution (DS) and degree of acetylation (DA) determined by potentiometric titration, FTIR, and NMR for chitin and chitin derivatives.
| Potentiometric Titration | FTIR Analyses | NMR | XRD | TGA | EIS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples | DS | DA | DA | DS | DA | CI (Crystalline Index) | Td (Onset) °C | T (Peak) °C | Ionic Conductivity S/cm |
| Chitin | - | 69 ± 1 | 68 | - | 82 | 63% | 215 | 273 | 1.55 × 10−9 * |
| CMChit_15 | 0.93 ± 0.05 | 64 ± 3 | 63 | 1.73 | 75 | 27% | 215 | 273 | 9.21 × 10−6 |
| CMChit_30 | 0.95 ± 0.05 | 60 ± 2 | 61 | 1.90 | 70 | 24% | 215 | 270 | 4.17 × 10−6 |
| CMChit_45 | 0.92 ± 0.10 | 51 ± 4 | 56 | 2.85 | 65 | 24% | 210 | 272 | 3.08 × 10−6 |
* Test is performed on pellets of chitin flakes instead of films.
Figure 4XRD Diffractograms of the unmodified chitin and different carboxymethylated derivatives obtained under different conditions.
Figure 5FE-SEM imaging (middle) and the corresponding EDX mapping (right) of unmodified chitin (A) and carboxymethylated derivatives (B): CMChit_15, (C): CMChit_30, (D): CMChit_45) obtained under different conditions. On the left are presented the optical photos of the corresponding flakes.
Figure 6TGA thermograms (A) and corresponding first derivatives (B) of unmodified chitin and carboxymethylated derivatives obtained under different conditions.
Figure 7Optical photos of CMChit (left) and CMChit/IL films (right).
Figure 8FE-SEM pictures of films based on carboxymethylated chitin derivatives (top to bottom CMChit_15, CMChit_30 and CMChit_45) obtained by solvent casting in 1% acetic acid aqueous solution.
Figure 9The proposed mechanisms of ion motion in (top) CMChit/Acetic Acid aqueous solution and in (bottom) CMChit/Bmim[Ac]/acetic acid system.
Figure 10Ionic conductivity of carboxymethyl chitin CMChit_30 with different amounts of BMIM [Ac].