Literature DB >> 31947029

Influence of gender-related differences in transcranial direct current stimulation: A Computational Study.

Chris Thomas, Iman Ghodratitoostani, Alexandre C B Delbem, Afaq Ali, Abhishek Datta.   

Abstract

Gender-related anatomical differences have been reported with respect to brain and cerebrospinal fluid. The cortical induced electric field (EF) in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) depends both on the dose (electrode montage and applied current) and the individual anatomical details. Therefore in spite of fixed dose, one can expect gender-related differences to impact induced EF which in turn would influence tDCS outcome. The abundance of promise with tDCS in both research and clinical domains is also accompanied with variability in response. The in-constant induced cortical EF is one of the main contributors of this variability.The aim of this study is to quantify the effects of the gender-related morphological changes on tDCS induced cortical EF. MRI data were obtained for 10 healthy individuals (5 males: M1-M5 and 5 females: F1-F5) spanning ages 27-47 years. Finite element models derived from the individual MRI and simulating the classic left motor cortex-contralateral supraorbital (C3-SO) montage were used to predict the cortical EF. The percentage tissue volume were also determined to illustrate anatomical differences in the dataset considered.Findings indicate that induced EF is higher in female head models on an average than male head models across several metrics. While the average peak EF value in female head models was comparable to that of male head models, the mean and median values were 11.6% and 10% higher. On an individual basis, the highest peak value was observed in a female subject F3 (0.83 V/m) while the lowest peak value was observed in male subject M2 (0.34 V/m) -indicating a variation of ~2.4-fold across the dataset considered. The average gray matter percentage volume in females was 11.6% higher than in males. The average white matter percentage volume was 8.7% higher in females while negligible CSF percentage volume difference was noted across gender. The results of our study indicate gender-related differences in tDCS induced current flow and quantify the extent of this variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31947029     DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  9 in total

1.  Reading proficiency influences the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation: Evidence from selective modulation of dorsal and ventral pathways of reading in bilinguals.

Authors:  Sagarika Bhattacharjee; Rajan Kashyap; Beth Ann O'Brien; Michael McCloskey; Kenichi Oishi; John E Desmond; Brenda Rapp; S H Annabel Chen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Sex difference in tDCS current mediated by changes in cortical anatomy: A study across young, middle and older adults.

Authors:  Sagarika Bhattacharjee; Rajan Kashyap; Alicia M Goodwill; Beth Ann O'Brien; Brenda Rapp; Kenichi Oishi; John E Desmond; S H Annabel Chen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 9.184

3.  Investigating the sex-dependent effects of prefrontal cortex stimulation on response execution and inhibition.

Authors:  Daniel J Fehring; Ranshikha Samandra; Zakia Z Haque; Shapour Jaberzadeh; Marcello Rosa; Farshad A Mansouri
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.027

4.  Dose-Response Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Study Design: A Well-Controlled Adaptive Seamless Bayesian Method to Illuminate Negative Valence Role in Tinnitus Perception.

Authors:  Iman Ghodratitoostani; Oilson A Gonzatto; Zahra Vaziri; Alexandre C B Delbem; Bahador Makkiabadi; Abhishek Datta; Chris Thomas; Miguel A Hyppolito; Antonio C D Santos; Francisco Louzada; João Pereira Leite
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  Sensorimotor performance after high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary somatosensory or motor cortices in men versus women.

Authors:  Yochai Swissa; Shlomi Hacohen; Jason Friedman; Silvi Frenkel-Toledo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces motivation to drink ethanol and reacquisition of ethanol self-administration in female mice.

Authors:  Solène Pedron; Stéphanie Dumontoy; Maria Del Carmen González-Marín; Fabien Coune; Andries Van Schuerbeek; Emmanuel Haffen; Mickael Naassila; Vincent Van Waes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Variation of cerebrospinal fluid in specific regions regulates focality in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Rajan Kashyap; Sagarika Bhattacharjee; Rose Dawn Bharath; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Kaviraja Udupa; Shahid Bashir; Kenichi Oishi; John E Desmond; S H Annabel Chen; Cuntai Guan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the posterior parietal cortex improves visuomotor performance and proprioception in the lower extremities.

Authors:  Yasushi Kamii; Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.473

9.  Standard Non-Personalized Electric Field Modeling of Twenty Typical tDCS Electrode Configurations via the Computational Finite Element Method: Contributions and Limitations of Two Different Approaches.

Authors:  Andrés Molero-Chamizo; Michael A Nitsche; Carolina Gutiérrez Lérida; Ángeles Salas Sánchez; Raquel Martín Riquel; Rafael Tomás Andújar Barroso; José Ramón Alameda Bailén; Jesús Carlos García Palomeque; Guadalupe Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.