Literature DB >> 31946737

Ecological Momentary Assessment based Differences between Android and iOS Users of the TrackYourHearing mHealth Crowdsensing Platform.

Rudiger Pryss, Johannes Schobel, Burkhard Hoppenstedt, Myra Spiliopoulou, Berthold Langguth, Thomas Probst, Winfried Schlee, Manfred Reichert, Ira Kurthen, Nathalie Giroud, Laura Jagoda, Pia Neuschwander, Martin Meyer, Patrick Neff.   

Abstract

mHealth technologies are increasingly utilized in various medical contexts. Mobile crowdsensing is such a technology, which is often used for data collection scenarios related to questions on chronic disorders. One prominent reason for the latter setting is based on the fact that powerful Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA) can be performed. Notably, when mobile crowdsensing solutions are used to integrate EMA measurements, many new challenges arise. For example, the measurements must be provided in the same way on different mobile operating systems. However, the newly given possibilities can surpass the challenges. For example, if different mobile operating systems must be technically provided, one direction could be to investigate whether users of different mobile operating systems pose a different behaviour when performing EMA measurements. In a previous work, we investigated differences between iOS and Android users from the TrackYourTinnitus mHealth crowdsensing platform, which has the goal to reveal insights on the daily fluctuations of tinnitus patients. In this work, we investigated differences between iOS and Android users from the TrackYourHearing mHealth crowdsensing platform, which aims at insights on the daily fluctuations of patients with hearing loss. We analyzed 3767 EMA measurements based on a daily applied questionnaire of 84 patients. Statistical analyses have been conducted to see whether these 84 patients differ with respect to the used mobile operating system and their given answers to the EMA measurements. We present the obtained results and compare them to the previous mentioned study. Our insights show the differences in the two studies and that the overall results are worth being investigated in a more in-depth manner. Particularly, it must be investigated whether the used mobile operating system constitutes a confounder when gathering EMA-based data through a crowdsensing platform.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31946737     DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  3 in total

1.  Development of a Mobile App for Clinical Research: Challenges and Implications for Investigators.

Authors:  Shibani Chettri; Vivian Wang; Eli Asher Balkin; Michael F Rayo; Clara N Lee
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.947

2.  Applying Machine Learning to Daily-Life Data From the TrackYourTinnitus Mobile Health Crowdsensing Platform to Predict the Mobile Operating System Used With High Accuracy: Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  Rüdiger Pryss; Winfried Schlee; Burkhard Hoppenstedt; Manfred Reichert; Myra Spiliopoulou; Berthold Langguth; Marius Breitmayer; Thomas Probst
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Predicting Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using Smartphone and Wearable Data.

Authors:  Isaac Moshe; Yannik Terhorst; Kennedy Opoku Asare; Lasse Bosse Sander; Denzil Ferreira; Harald Baumeister; David C Mohr; Laura Pulkki-Råback
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.