Literature DB >> 31945621

Clinicopathologic determinants of pathologic treatment response in neoadjuvant treated rectal adenocarcinoma.

Iván González1, Philip S Bauer2, William C Chapman2, Zahra Alipour1, Rehan Rais1, Jingxia Liu3, Deyali Chatterjee4.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) followed by total mesorectal excision is currently considered the standard of treatment for rectal adenocarcinoma. The degree of pathologic treatment response (pTR) correlates significantly with the recurrence free survival and overall survival (OS). However, it remains unclear which clinical and pathologic factors are associated with a more robust response to NAT, including showing pathologic complete response (pCR). Chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) overexpression has been associated with unfavorable OS in some studies. In this study, we sought to evaluate the clinicopathologic determinants of pTR in neoadjuvant treated rectal adenocarcinoma (NAT-RA). We retrospectively identified 91 patients who underwent pre-treatment diagnostic biopsy, NAT, and surgical resection at our institution. The archival slides were reviewed for pathologic features in the pre-treatment biopsies and for assessment of pTR in the resection specimens according to the current College of American Pathologist (CAP)'s guidelines. pCR was obtained in 16.5% of the cases, whereas 20.9% had near pCR, 30.8% had partial response, and 31.9% had a poor/no response. CXCR4 immunohistochemical analysis was also performed on the pre-treatment biopsies. Lower pre-treatment cT-stage (p = 0.019) and pre-treatment AJCC cTNM stage groups (p = 0.004), longer time interval between completion of NAT and resection (p = 0.022), and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the pre-treatment biopsies (p = 0.019) were significantly associated with a better pTR. CXCR4 nuclear expression was associated with a lower percentage of residual tumor (p = 0.036). Pre-treatment CEA levels, tumor differentiation, CAP treatment response groups and lower percentage of residual tumor were associated with a better OS.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CXCR4; Complete response; NAT; Neoadjuvant treatment; Rectal adenocarcinoma; TILs; Treatment response; Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31945621      PMCID: PMC7195850          DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.151452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 1092-9134            Impact factor:   2.090


  46 in total

1.  Characterization of CXCR4 expression in chondrosarcoma of bone.

Authors:  Shuting Bai; Dezhi Wang; Michael J Klein; Gene P Siegal
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Tumor budding is an independent adverse prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kate O'Connor; Hector H Li-Chang; Steven E Kalloger; Renata D Peixoto; Douglas L Webber; David A Owen; David K Driman; Richard Kirsch; Stefano Serra; Charles H Scudamore; Daniel J Renouf; David F Schaeffer
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Interval between neoadjuvant treatment and definitive surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: impact on response and oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Felipe A Calvo; Virginia Morillo; Marcos Santos; Javier Serrano; Marina Gomez-Espí; Marcos Rodriguez; Emilio Del Vale; Jose Luis Gracia-Sabrido; Carlos Ferrer; Claudio Sole
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Normalization of CEA Levels Post-Neoadjuvant Therapy is a Strong Predictor of Pathologic Complete Response in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ariella Kleiman; Ahmed Al-Khamis; Ali Farsi; Abbas Kezouh; Te Vuong; Philip H Gordon; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Nancy Morin; Julio Faria; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Marylise Boutros
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Prognostic factors in rectal carcinoma. A contribution to the further development of tumor classification.

Authors:  P Hermanek; I Guggenmoos-Holzmann; F P Gall
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  CXCR4 and CXCL12 Expression in Rectal Tumors of Stage IV Patients Before and After Local Radiotherapy and Systemic Neoadjuvant Treatment.

Authors:  Karin Tamas; Urszula M Domanska; Tonnis H van Dijk; Hetty Timmer-Bosscha; Klaas Havenga; Arend Karrenbeld; Wim J Sluiter; Jannet C Beukema; Marcel A T M van Vugt; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Geke A P Hospers; Annemiek M E Walenkamp
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.116

7.  Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.

Authors:  Monique Maas; Patty J Nelemans; Vincenzo Valentini; Prajnan Das; Claus Rödel; Li-Jen Kuo; Felipe A Calvo; Julio García-Aguilar; Rob Glynne-Jones; Karin Haustermans; Mohammed Mohiuddin; Salvatore Pucciarelli; William Small; Javier Suárez; George Theodoropoulos; Sebastiano Biondo; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Geerard L Beets
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Tumor Budding and PDC Grade Are Stage Independent Predictors of Clinical Outcome in Mismatch Repair Deficient Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Éanna Ryan; Yi Ling Khaw; Ben Creavin; Robert Geraghty; Elizabeth J Ryan; David Gibbons; Ann Hanly; Sean T Martin; P Ronan O'Connell; Desmond C Winter; Kieran Sheahan
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Assessment of a Watch-and-Wait Strategy for Rectal Cancer in Patients With a Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  J Joshua Smith; Paul Strombom; Oliver S Chow; Campbell S Roxburgh; Patricio Lynn; Anne Eaton; Maria Widmar; Karuna Ganesh; Rona Yaeger; Andrea Cercek; Martin R Weiser; Garrett M Nash; Jose G Guillem; Larissa K F Temple; Sree B Chalasani; James L Fuqua; Iva Petkovska; Abraham J Wu; Marsha Reyngold; Efsevia Vakiani; Jinru Shia; Neil H Segal; James D Smith; Christopher Crane; Marc J Gollub; Mithat Gonen; Leonard B Saltz; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Philip B Paty
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  The clinical impact of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in colorectal cancer differs by anatomical subsite: A cohort study.

Authors:  Jonna Berntsson; Maria C Svensson; Karin Leandersson; Björn Nodin; Patrick Micke; Anna H Larsson; Jakob Eberhard; Karin Jirström
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  4 in total

1.  Machine Learning of Histomorphological Features Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Anqi Wang; Ruiqi Ding; Jing Zhang; Beibei Zhang; Xiaolin Huang; Haiyang Zhou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Adenoma-like adenocarcinoma: clinicopathologic characterization of a newly recognized subtype of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Iván A González; Philip S Bauer; Jingxia Liu; Deyali Chatterjee
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 3.  Intraepithelial tumour infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with absence of tumour budding and immature/myxoid desmoplastic reaction, and with better recurrence-free survival in stages I-III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  I A González; P S Bauer; J Liu; D Chatterjee
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  A Panel of Tumor Biomarkers to Predict Complete Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Chiara Dalle Fratte; Silvia Mezzalira; Jerry Polesel; Elena De Mattia; Antonio Palumbo; Angela Buonadonna; Elisa Palazzari; Antonino De Paoli; Claudio Belluco; Vincenzo Canzonieri; Giuseppe Toffoli; Erika Cecchin
Journal:  Oncol Res       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.574

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.