Literature DB >> 31943710

Enrolment criteria for diabetes cardiovascular outcome trials do not inform on generalizability to clinical practice: The case of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

Veronica Sciannameo1, Paola Berchialla2, Emanuela Orsi3, Olga Lamacchia4, Susanna Morano5, Fabrizio Querci6, Agostino Consoli7, Angelo Avogaro8, Gian Paolo Fadini.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the generalizability of cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), we assessed what proportion of real-world patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) constitute true CVOT-like populations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied inclusion/exclusion (I/E) criteria of each GLP-1RA CVOT to a cross-sectional database of 281 380 T2D patients from Italian diabetes outpatient clinics. We calculated the proportion of patients eligible for each CVOT and compared their clinical characteristics with those of trial patients. In addition, we used a Bayesian network-based method to sample the greatest subsets of real-world patients yielding true CVOT-like populations.
RESULTS: Between 98 725 and 124 164 T2D patients could be evaluated for CVOT eligibility. After excluding patients who were already on GLP-1RAs and applying I/E criteria, 35.8% of patients would be eligible for REWIND, 34.1% for PIONEER-6, 13.4% for EXSCEL, 10.1% for SUSTAIN-6, 9.5% for HARMONY and 9.4% for LEADER. Overall, 45.4% of patients could be eligible for at least one of the CVOTs. These patients, however, were extremely different to trial patients in most of the clinical characteristics, including demographics, concomitant medications and complications. The greatest CVOT-like subsets of real-world patients were 0.5% for SUSTAIN-6, 1.0% for EXSCEL, 1.2% for LEADER, 1.8% for PIONEER-6 and 7.9% for REWIND.
CONCLUSIONS: A very small proportion of real-world patients constitute true CVOT-like populations. These findings question whether any meaningful information can be drawn from applying trial enrolment criteria to real-world T2D patients.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular disease; glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue; pharmaco-epidemiology; population study; type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31943710     DOI: 10.1111/dom.13962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab        ISSN: 1462-8902            Impact factor:   6.577


  10 in total

1.  Cardiovascular outcomes of type 2 diabetic patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus GLP-1 receptor agonists in real-life.

Authors:  Enrico Longato; Barbara Di Camillo; Giovanni Sparacino; Lorenzo Gubian; Angelo Avogaro; Gian Paolo Fadini
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-06

Review 2.  Long-Acting Injectable GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Perspectives from Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Mario Luca Morieri; Angelo Avogaro; Gian Paolo Fadini
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.249

3.  How many people with type 2 diabetes fulfil the eligibility criteria for randomized, controlled trials of insulin glargine 300 U/mL in a real-world setting?

Authors:  Dídac Mauricio; Jukka Westerbacka; Charlie Nicholls; Jasmanda Wu; Rishab Gupta; Björn Eliasson
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 4.  Cardiovascular and Renal Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists vs. Other Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies.

Authors:  Irene Caruso; Angelo Cignarelli; Gian Pio Sorice; Annalisa Natalicchio; Sebastio Perrini; Luigi Laviola; Francesco Giorgino
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-02-15

5.  Cardiovascular risk profiles: A cross-sectional study evaluating the generalizability of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist cardiovascular outcome trials REWIND, LEADER and SUSTAIN-6 to the real-world type 2 diabetes population in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Joanne Webb; Julie Mount; Lill-Brith von Arx; Jonathan Rachman; Dionysis Spanopoulos; Robert Wood; Theo Tritton; Olivia Massey; Iskandar Idris
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 6.408

Review 6.  Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?

Authors:  Jan W Eriksson; Björn Eliasson; Louise Bennet; Johan Sundström
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 10.460

7.  Generalizability of the Results of Cardiovascular Outcome Trials of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Xiaoling Cai; Linong Ji
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.945

8.  Patients' perceptions of frequent hospital admissions: a qualitative interview study with older people above 65 years of age.

Authors:  Miaolin Huang; Carolien van der Borght; Merel Leithaus; Johan Flamaing; Geert Goderis
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 9.  Cardiovascular outcomes trials with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: A comparison of study designs, populations and results.

Authors:  Kevin M Pantalone; Kashif Munir; Clinton M Hasenour; Charles M Atisso; Oralee J Varnado; Juan M Maldonado; Manige Konig
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 10.  Heterogeneity amongst GLP-1 RA cardiovascular outcome trials results: can definition of established cardiovascular disease be the missing link?

Authors:  Miguel Melo; Cristina Gavina; José Silva-Nunes; Luís Andrade; Davide Carvalho
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.320

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.