Literature DB >> 31943225

Plant functional groups associate with distinct arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities.

John Davison1, David García de León1,2, Martin Zobel1,3, Mari Moora1, C Guillermo Bueno1, Milagros Barceló4, Maret Gerz1, Daniela León1, Yiming Meng1, Valerio D Pillar5, Siim-Kaarel Sepp1, Nadejda A Soudzilovaskaia4, Leho Tedersoo6, Stijn Vaessen4, Tanel Vahter1, Bruna Winck5, Maarja Öpik1.   

Abstract

The benefits of the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis between plants and fungi are modulated by the functional characteristics of both partners. However, it is unknown to what extent functionally distinct groups of plants naturally associate with different AM fungi. We reanalysed 14 high-throughput sequencing data sets describing AM fungal communities associating with plant individuals (2427) belonging to 297 species. We examined how root-associating AM fungal communities varied between plants with different growth forms, photosynthetic pathways, CSR (competitor, stress-tolerator, ruderal) strategies, mycorrhizal statuses and N-fixing statuses. AM fungal community composition differed in relation to all studied plant functional groups. Grasses, C4 and nonruderal plants were characterised by high AM fungal alpha diversity, while C4 , ruderal and obligately mycorrhizal plants were characterised by high beta diversity. The phylogenetic diversity of AM fungi, a potential surrogate for functional diversity, was higher among forbs than other plant growth forms. Putatively ruderal (previously cultured) AM fungi were disproportionately associated with forbs and ruderal plants. There was phylogenetic correlation among AM fungi in the degree of association with different plant growth forms and photosynthetic pathways. Associated AM fungal communities constitute an important component of plant ecological strategies. Functionally different plants associate with distinct AM fungal communities, linking mycorrhizal associations with functional diversity in ecosystems.
© 2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SSU rRNA gene; arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis; functional traits; growth form; photosynthetic pathway; plant mycorrhizal status; strategy type

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31943225     DOI: 10.1111/nph.16423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  10 in total

1.  Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities of forbs and C3 grasses respond differently to cultivation and elevated nutrients.

Authors:  Petr Šmilauer; Marie Šmilauerová; Milan Kotilínek; Jiří Košnar
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Mycelium chemistry differs markedly between ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Authors:  Weilin Huang; Peter M van Bodegom; Stéphane Declerck; Jussi Heinonsalo; Marco Cosme; Toni Viskari; Jari Liski; Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  Variations in Plant Water Use Efficiency Response to Manipulated Precipitation in a Temperate Grassland.

Authors:  Xuying Hai; Jianping Li; Jiwei Li; Yulin Liu; Lingbo Dong; Xiaozhen Wang; Wenwen Lv; Zhenhong Hu; Zhouping Shangguan; Lei Deng
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Crop diversity enriches arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in an intensive agricultural landscape.

Authors:  Aidee Guzman; Marisol Montes; Leslie Hutchins; Gisel DeLaCerda; Paula Yang; Anne Kakouridis; Ruth M Dahlquist-Willard; Mary K Firestone; Timothy Bowles; Claire Kremen
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 10.323

5.  Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding?

Authors:  Robert Lücking; M Catherine Aime; Barbara Robbertse; Andrew N Miller; Hiran A Ariyawansa; Takayuki Aoki; Gianluigi Cardinali; Pedro W Crous; Irina S Druzhinina; David M Geiser; David L Hawksworth; Kevin D Hyde; Laszlo Irinyi; Rajesh Jeewon; Peter R Johnston; Paul M Kirk; Elaine Malosso; Tom W May; Wieland Meyer; Maarja Öpik; Vincent Robert; Marc Stadler; Marco Thines; Duong Vu; Andrey M Yurkov; Ning Zhang; Conrad L Schoch
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.515

6.  Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant-soil feedbacks.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Wandrag; Sarah E Bates; Luke G Barrett; Jane A Catford; Peter H Thrall; Wim H van der Putten; Richard P Duncan
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Specific Plant Mycorrhizal Responses Are Linked to Mycorrhizal Fungal Species Interactions.

Authors:  Xin Guo; Ping Wang; Xinjie Wang; Yaoming Li; Baoming Ji
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Compartment and Plant Identity Shape Tree Mycobiome in a Subtropical Forest.

Authors:  Hao Yang; Zhijie Yang; Quan-Cheng Wang; Yong-Long Wang; Hang-Wei Hu; Ji-Zheng He; Yong Zheng; Yusheng Yang
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-07-12

9.  Hedgerows increase the diversity and modify the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Mediterranean agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Guillermo González Fradejas; David García de León; Martti Vasar; Kadri Koorem; Martin Zobel; Maarja Öpik; Mari Moora; José María Rey Benayas
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.856

10.  Direct transfer of zinc between plants is channelled by common mycorrhizal network of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and evidenced by changes in expression of zinc transporter genes in fungus and plant.

Authors:  Alessio Cardini; Elisa Pellegrino; Stéphane Declerck; Maryline Calonne-Salmon; Barbara Mazzolai; Laura Ercoli
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.491

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.