Literature DB >> 31942687

Evidence of compliance with and effectiveness of guidelines for noninvasive prenatal testing in China: a retrospective study of 189,809 cases.

Chan Tian1,2,3,4, Tao Deng5, Xiuhuang Zhu5, Chen Gong1,2,3,4, Yangyu Zhao6, Yuan Wei6, Rong Li1,2,3,4, Xiufeng Xu5, Miaonan He5, Zhiwei Zhang5, Jing Cheng7,8, Mol BenWillem9, Jie Qiao10,11,12,13,14,15.   

Abstract

In China, the medical guidelines recommend performing noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) with caution for pregnant women aged 35 years or older. However, the Mother and Child Health Care Law suggests that all primiparous women whose age is older than 35 years undergo prenatal diagnosis. These two inconsistent suggestions/recommendations have made obstetricians confused about whether to offer NIPT to these older pregnant women. To face this issue and find out the solution we performed a retrospective study of 189,809 NIPT samples collected from 28 provincial-leveled administrative units in China. Of 1,564 women with high-risk pregnancies who underwent NIPT, 459 (29.3%) did not participate in follow-up. The compound sensitivity and specificity of NIPT for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 detection was 99.1% (95% CI, 98.0%-99.6%) and 99.9% (95% CI, 98.8%-99.9%), respectively. In secundiparous women, NIPT showed high sensitivity and specificity similar to that in primiparous women. The observed risk for trisomies 21 and 18 significantly increased when the maternal age was 39 and older. After the publication of the current NIPT policy, the follow-up rate at our center was 91.9%; however, a large number of women are not in maternal and infant care networks nationwide, and that makes the follow-up rate outside our center relatively low. Our study shows that to balance the prevention of major aneuploidies and the limited resources for prenatal diagnosis, the cut-off age of 35 for invasive prenatal diagnosis might be unnecessary. Although the NIPT guidelines are well written, how to practice it effectively, especially in less industrialized areas, is worth discussing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NIPT; NIPT policy in China; maternal age; prenatal diagnosis; risk for trisomy

Year:  2020        PMID: 31942687     DOI: 10.1007/s11427-019-9600-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci China Life Sci        ISSN: 1674-7305            Impact factor:   6.038


  9 in total

1.  cfDNA deconvolution via NIPT of a pregnant woman after bone marrow transplant and donor egg IVF.

Authors:  Jianjiang Zhu; Feng Hui; Xuequn Mao; Shaoqin Zhang; Hong Qi; Yang Du
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 4.639

2.  Clinical Application of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies in Central China.

Authors:  Ganye Zhao; Peng Dai; Conghui Wang; Lina Liu; Xuechao Zhao; Xiangdong Kong
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-26

3.  Optimal Follow-Up Duration for Assessment of Birth Defects After In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer: A Multicenter 5-Year Cohort Study in China.

Authors:  Chun-Lin Liu; Ping Li; Gui-Feng Cai; Abraham Morse; Jun Liu; Zhi-Heng Chen; Xiu Zhang; Ling Sun
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  The accuracy and feasibility of noninvasive prenatal testing in a consecutive series of 20,626 pregnancies with different clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Yunyun Zheng; Jia Li; Jianfang Zhang; Hong Yang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.124

5.  Study on the Clinical Value of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Screening the Chromosomal Abnormalities of the Fetus in the Elderly Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Zhiping Gu; Mengmeng Du; Tianhui Xu; Chunyan Jin
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Clinical Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Common Trisomies in Low-Risk and Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Yanfei Xu; Pengzhen Jin; Yu Lei; Yeqing Qian; Yuqing Xu; Miaomiao Wang; Jinglei Jin; Yixuan Yin; Minyue Dong
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  A Novel Graphic-Aided Algorithm (gNIPT) Improves the Accuracy of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Qingwen Zhu; Jing Wang; Xiaoning Xu; Shiying Zhou; Zhengli Liao; Jun Zhang; Lingyin Kong; Bo Liang; Xiaoyan Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Next-generation sequencing: a follow-up of 36,913 singleton pregnancies with noninvasive prenatal testing in central China.

Authors:  Wan Lu; Ting Huang; Xin-Rong Wang; Ji-Hui Zhou; Hui-Zhen Yuan; Yan Yang; Ting-Ting Huang; Dan-Ping Liu; Yan-Qiu Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Absolute Risk of Adverse Obstetric Outcomes Among Twin Pregnancies After In Vitro Fertilization by Maternal Age.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Huifeng Shi; Lian Chen; Danni Zheng; Xiaoyu Long; Yunjun Zhang; Haibo Wang; Ying Shi; Yangyu Zhao; Yuan Wei; Jie Qiao
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.