| Literature DB >> 31942186 |
Li Sun1,2, Xiangxiang Liu1, Bei Pan1, Xiuxiu Hu1, Yefei Zhu2, Yingying Su2, Zhirui Guo2, Guoying Zhang1, Mu Xu1, Xueni Xu1, Huiling Sun1, Shukui Wang1.
Abstract
Background: Liver is the most common site for metastatic spread of CRC at the time of diagnosis which leads to high mortality. This study aimed to identify novel circulating exosomal miRNAs as biomarkers of colorectal cancer (CRC) with liver metastasis (LM). Materials and methods: Candidate miRNAs were selected through integrated analysis of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database as well as clinical samples. Exosomes isolated from serum and cultured media were identified by using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and western blot. The expression levels and diagnostic value of candidate miRNAs were further tested and validated through qRT-PCR and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The association of candidate miRNA expressions with patients' prognosis was analyzed with logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models.Entities:
Keywords: colorectal cancer; diagnosis; exosomes; miRNA; prognosis.; serum
Year: 2020 PMID: 31942186 PMCID: PMC6959047 DOI: 10.7150/jca.33022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Figure 1MiR-122 expressions were remarkably upregulated in CRC with LM. (A) Hotmap of representative miRNAs significantly deregulated in CRC with LM based on GEO datasets. (B) The expression value of miR-122 in three GEO datasets. (C-D) The expression levels of miR-122 were significantly upregulated in CRC tissues and cells.
Figure 2Elevated serum miR-122 was tumor-derived. (A) Exosomes were identified using TEM and western blot. (B) The expressions of miR-122 in serum did not differ from that in pure exosomes isolated from equivolumetric serum. (C) The expressions of serum exosomal miR-122 were significantly downregulated after tumor being resected. (D) The expressions of exosomal miR-122 in serum of CRC patients were positively correlated with that in CRC tissues. (E) Exosomal miR-122 expressions in the culture media from both cell lines increased with time and with increasing numbers of cells. (F) The expressions of exosomal miR-122 in the culture media were significantly downregulated after being treated with GW4869.
Figure 3High expressions of serum exosomal miR-122 in CRC patients confirmed in a small set of subjects. (A) The relative expression levels of exosomal miR-122 were significantly upregulated in the serums of CRC patients with liver metastasis. (B) The diagnostic utility of serum exosomal miR-122 to differentiate CRC patients with LM from healthy subjects. (C) The diagnostic utility of serum exosomal miR-122 to differentiate CRC patients with LM from CRC patients without LM.
Correlations between serum exosomal miR-122 expression levels and clinicopathological features in CRC patients.
| Variables | Serum exosomal miR-122 expressions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Mean±SD | P value | |
| Age | |||
| <65 | 28 | 3.016 ± 0.267 | P=0.695 |
| ≥65 | 57 | 2.867 ± 0.233 | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 46 | 2.737 ± 0.2136 | P=0.875 |
| Female | 39 | 2.786 ± 0.2053 | |
| Histology differentiation | |||
| Well/moderate | 57 | 2.280 ± 0.2022 | P=0.274 |
| Poor | 28 | 2.669 ± 0.2310 | |
| Tumor size | |||
| <4 cm | 54 | 1.577 ± 0.2108 | P=0.0069 |
| ≥4 cm | 31 | 2.867 ± 0.1379 | |
| TNM stage | |||
| I/II | 47 | 2.216 ± 0.217 | P=0.0192 |
| III/IV | 38 | 3.252 ± 0.166 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| Negative | 48 | 2.223 ± 0.1357 | P=0.0744 |
| Positive | 37 | 2.694 ± 0.1419 | |
| Liver metastasis | |||
| Negative | 50 | 1.199 ± 0.08 | P<0.001 |
| Positive | 35 | 4.039 ± 0.345 | |
Figure 4The diagnostic value of circulating exosomal miR-122 validated in an independent cohort. (A) The expression levels of serum exosomal miR-122 were significantly upregulated in CRC patients with/without LM. (B) The diagnostic utility of serum exosomal miR-122 to differentiate CRC patients with LM from healthy subjects. (C) The diagnostic utility of serum exosomal miR-122 to differentiate CRC patients with LM from CRC patients without LM. (D-E) CRC patients, especially those with LM, who have high serum exosomal miR-122 expressions may suffer from poor OS.
Univariate and multivariate analysis for OS of CRC patients.
| Variables | univariate analysis | multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | |
| Age (≥65, <65) | 0.91 | 0.63-1.46 | 0.52 | |||
| Gender (male,female) | 0.87 | 0.53-1.31 | 0.37 | |||
| Histology differentiation (poor, moderate+well) | 1.12 | 0.87-2.04 | 0.17 | |||
| Tumor size (≥4 cm, <4 cm) | 1.27 | 0.79-2.28 | 0.29 | |||
| TNM stage (III/IV, I/II) | 1.35 | 1.04-4.73 | 0.032 | 1.21 | 0.93-3.01 | 0.097 |
| Lymph node metastasis (postive, negative) | 1.92 | 1.09-3.56 | 0.014 | 1.76 | 0.98-3.61 | 0.057 |
| Liver metastasis (postive, negative) | 3.52 | 1.73-6.14 | <0.001 | 3.83 | 1.92-6.64 | <0.001 |
| miR-122 expressions (high,low) | 2.39 | 1.15-4.99 | 0.0086 | 1.69 | 1.08-3.77 | 0.012 |