| Literature DB >> 31941898 |
Fenne A I M van den Bunder1, Ernest van Heurn2, Joep P M Derikx2.
Abstract
Pyloromyotomy is a common surgical procedure in infants with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and can be performed with a small laparotomy or laparoscopically. No specific complications have been documented about one of the approaches. We aim to study (severity of) complications of pyloromyotomy and to compare complications of both approaches. Children undergoing pyloromyotomy between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Complication severity was classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification. We included 474 infants (236 open; 238 laparoscopic). 401 were male (85%) and median (IQR) age was 33 (19) days. There were 83 surgical complications in 71 patients (15.0%). In the open group 45 infants (19.1%) experienced a complication vs. 26 infants in the laparoscopic group (10.5%)(p = 0.013). Severity and quantity of postoperative complications were comparable between both groups. Serosal tears of the stomach (N = 19) and fascial dehiscence (N = 8) occurred only after open pyloromyotomy. Herniation of omentum through a port site occurred only after laparoscopy (N = 6) and required re-intervention in all cases. In conclusion, the surgical complication rate of pyloromyotomy was 15.0%. Serosal tear of the stomach and fascial dehiscence are only present after open pyloromyotomy and omental herniation after laparoscopy respectively. The latter complication is underestimated and requires attention.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31941898 PMCID: PMC6962153 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57031-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics open vs lap.
| Total | Open (N = 236) | Laparoscopic (N = 238) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (M/F) | 401/73 | 195/41 | 206/32 | 0.24 |
| Age (days) | 33.0[ | 32.5[ | 35.0[ | 0.28 |
| Term/preterm | 422/48* | 213/23 | 209/25 | 0.74 |
| Birthweight (g) | 3440.0 [738]* | 3425.0 [720] | 3457.5 [787] | 0.84 |
Legend Values are patient numbers or median [Interquartile Range].
*Missing values.
Number of complications of open vs laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.
| Total (incidence %) (N = 474) | Open (N = 236) | Laparoscopic (N = 238) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative no signs of IHPS | 5 (1.1) | − | − | − |
| Accidental mucosal perforation (stitched) | 4 (0.8) | 2 | 2 | 1.000 |
| Serosal tears of the stomach | 19 (4.0) | 19 | 0 | |
| Hemorrhage | 1 (0.2) | 0 | 1 | 1.000 |
| Lesion of the skin | 1 (0.2) | 1 | 0 | 0.498 |
| Lesion of the liver | 1 (0.2) | 0 | 1 | 1.000 |
| Overlooked mucosal perforation (reoperation) | 2 (0.4) | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
| Fascial dehiscence | 8 (1.7) | 8 | 0 | |
| Omental herniation | 6 (1.3) | 0 | 6 | |
| Wound infection | 21 (4.4) | 14 | 7 | 0.114 |
| Redo pyloromyotomy (incomplete/recurrent) | 4 (0.8) | 1 | 3 | 0.623 |
| Incisional hernia | 10 (2.1) | 4 | 6 | 0.751 |
| Sepsis | 3 (0.6) | 2 | 1 | 0.623 |
| Hemorrhage (reoperation) | 1 (0.2) | 0 | 1 | 1.000 |
| Peritonitis | 1 (0.2) | 0 | 1 | 1.000 |
| Subcutaneous hematoma | 1 (0.2) | 1 | 0 | 0.498 |
Number of postoperative complications classified by the Clavien-Dindo classification.
| open | lap | open | lap | open | lap | open | lap | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mucosal perforation | 2* | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| Fascial dehiscence | 8 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | — |
| Omental herniation | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | — | 3 |
| Wound infection | 21 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 2 | — | — | — | — |
| Redo pyloromyotomy | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 |
| Incisional hernia | 10 | 4 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sepsis | 3 | — | — | 2 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Hemorrhage | 1* | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Peritonitis | 1 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Subcutaneous hematoma | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
*Complications which were recognized and treated sufficiently peroperative were excluded.
Patient characteristics of patients with OH.
| Sex | Age (days) | Incisions | Closure of the incision after pyloromyotomy | Herniation | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ♂ | 30 | Stab incision in the right lower abdomen and left upper abdomen | All fascia defects are closed with knotted Vicryl sutures and subcutis of the umbilicus was approximated with Vicryl. Skin defects were closed with Steristrips. | Left upper abdomen | Reduction (twice) under local anesthesia and taped with Steristrips. |
| ♀ | 29 | Stab incision in the right lower abdomen and left upper abdomen | All fascia defects are closed with knotted Vicryl sutures and subcutis of the umbilicus was approximated with Vicryl. Skin defects were closed with Steristrips. | Left upper abdomen | Reduction and taped with Steristrips. Unknown whether local anesthesia was used. |
| ♂ | 40 | Insertion of a 3 mm trocar in the right hemi-abdomen and stab incision in the left hemi-abdomen | Infra umbilical fascia is closed with Vicryl sutures followed by intracutaneous closure with Monocryl. Other defects are closed with Steristrips. | Right hemi-abdomen | Resection and reduction of the herniated omentum under general anesthesia. Closure of the fascia with Vicryl sutures. |
| ♂ | 52 | Insertion of a 3 mm trocar in the right hemi-abdomen and stab incision in the left hemi-abdomen | Infra umbilical fascia is closed with Vicryl sutures followed by intracutaneous closure with Monocryl. Other defects are closed with Steristrips. | Right hemi-abdomen | Reduction under general anesthesia. |
| ♂ | 34 | Insertion of a 3 mm trocar in the right side and stab incision in epigastrio | Infra umbilical fascia is closed with Vicryl sutures followed by intracutaneous closure with Monocryl. Other defects are closed with Steristrips. | Right side | Reduction. Unknown whether local anesthesia was used. |
| ♀ | 29 | Stab incision in the right side and in the left upper abdomen. | All fascia defects are closed with Novosyn sutures. Skin defects are closed with Steristrips. | Left upper abdomen | Reduction under general anesthesia. Closure of the fascia with Novosyn sutures. |