Literature DB >> 31941529

Correction of marked sagittal deformity with circumferential minimally invasive surgery using oblique lateral interbody fusion in adult spinal deformity.

Seung Won Park1, Myeong Jin Ko2, Young Baeg Kim2, Jean Charles Le Huec3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal surgery performed entirely with minimally invasive surgery is referred to as circumferential MIS (cMIS). However, cMIS still has a limited sagittal correction capability for adult spinal deformity (ASD) with a marked sagittal deformity. We investigated the effectiveness of cMIS using oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and percutaneous posterior spine fixation in correcting marked sagittal deformity.
METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 23 patients with ASD with marked sagittal deformity who underwent cMIS using OLIF without osteotomy and were followed-up for at least 24 months (whole group). The whole group was divided into the following two groups according to the type of interbody fusion at L5-S1: the OLIF51 group (n = 13) underwent OLIF at L1-L5 and L5-S1 and the TLIF51 group (n = 10) underwent OLIF at L1-L5 and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at L5-S1.
RESULTS: Sagittal vertebral axis (SVA; 125.7 vs. 29.5 mm, p < 0.001), lumbar lordosis (LL; 18.2° vs. 51.7°, p < 0.001), and pelvic incidence-LL mismatch (PI-LL, 35.5° vs. 5.3°) significantly improved postoperatively in the whole group. The OLIF51 group showed significantly higher postoperative LL than the TLIF51 group (55.5° vs. 46.9°, p < 0.001). OLIF yielded a significantly greater disc angle at L5-S1 than did TLIF (18.4° vs. 6.9°, p < 0.001). Proximal junctional kyphosis occurred significantly earlier in the OLIF51 group than in the TLIF51 group (8.6 vs. 26.3 months, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Successful sagittal correction in ASD patients with marked sagittal deformity was achieved with cMIS using OLIF. OLIF at L5-S1 showed a synergistic effect in sagittal deformity correction by cMIS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Marked sagittal deformity; Minimally invasive spine surgery; Oblique lateral interbody fusion; Percutaneous fixation; Sagittal correction

Year:  2020        PMID: 31941529     DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-1545-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


  6 in total

1.  Impact of Spinal Navigation on the Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Paul Park
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-03-31

Review 2.  Lumbar Spinal Fusion Using Lateral Oblique (Pre-psoas) Approach (Review).

Authors:  A Ya Aleinik; S G Mlyavykh; S Qureshi
Journal:  Sovrem Tekhnologii Med       Date:  2021-10-29

3.  The Morphological Changes in Adjacent Segments Amongst Patients Receiving Anterior and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Kuan-Kai Tung; Fang-Wei Hsu; Hsien-Che Ou; Kun-Hui Chen; Chien-Chou Pan; Wen-Xian Lu; Ning-Chien Chin; Cheng-Min Shih; Yun-Che Wu; Cheng-Hung Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Pearls and Pitfalls of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Authors:  Hyoungmin Kim; Bong-Soon Chang; Sam Yeol Chang
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-03-31

5.  Indirect decompression via oblique lumbar interbody fusion is sufficient for treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Sheng-Chieh Tseng; Yu-Hsien Lin; Yun-Che Wu; Cheng-Min Shih; Kun-Hui Chen; Cheng-Hung Lee; Chien-Chou Pan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-18

6.  Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Jun-Wu Wang; Liang Zhang; Xin-Min Feng
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-01-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.