Monica P Shah1, Laura C Steinhardt2, Dyson Mwandama3, Themba Mzilahowa3, John E Gimnig4, Andy Bauleni3, Jacklyn Wong4, Ryan Wiegand2, Don P Mathanga3, Kim A Lindblade2. 1. Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. MShah2@cdc.gov. 2. Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. College of Medicine, Malaria Alert Centre, Blantyre, Malawi. 4. Entomology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A previous cohort study in Malawi showed that users of new insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) were significantly protected against malaria compared to non-users, despite moderate levels of pyrethroid resistance among the primary mosquito vectors. The present study investigated whether ITNs that were 1-2 years old continued to protect users in the same area with moderate pyrethroid resistance. METHODS: One year following a baseline cross-sectional malaria parasitaemia prevalence survey and universal distribution of deltamethrin ITNs (May 2012), a fixed cohort of 1223 children aged 6-59 months was enrolled (April 2013). Children were tested for parasitaemia at monthly scheduled visits and at unscheduled sick visits from May to December 2013 using rapid diagnostic tests. ITN use the prior night and the condition of ITNs (based on presence of holes) was assessed by caregiver self-report. The incidence rate ratio (RR) comparing malaria infection among users and non-users of ITNs was modelled using generalized estimating equations adjusting for potential confounders and accounting for repeated measures on each child. The protective efficacy (PE) of ITN use was calculated as 1 - RR. RESULTS: In this cohort, self-reported ITN use remained consistently high (> 95%) over the study period. Although users of ITNs were slightly more protected compared to non-users of ITNs, the difference in incidence of infection was not statistically significant (RR 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-1.27). Among ITN users, malaria incidence was significantly lower in users of ITNs with no holes (of any size) compared to users of ITNs with ≥ 1 hole (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant PE of using 1-2 year-old ITNs on the incidence of malaria in children in an area of moderate pyrethroid resistance, but among ITN users, the authors found increased protection by ITNs with no holes compared to ITNs with holes. Given the moderate levels of pyrethroid resistance in the primary malaria vector and recent evidence of added benefits of ITNs with synergists or non-pyrethroid insecticides, next-generation ITNs may be a useful strategy to address pyrethroid resistance and should be further explored in Malawi.
BACKGROUND: A previous cohort study in Malawi showed that users of new insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) were significantly protected against malaria compared to non-users, despite moderate levels of pyrethroid resistance among the primary mosquito vectors. The present study investigated whether ITNs that were 1-2 years old continued to protect users in the same area with moderate pyrethroid resistance. METHODS: One year following a baseline cross-sectional malaria parasitaemia prevalence survey and universal distribution of deltamethrin ITNs (May 2012), a fixed cohort of 1223 children aged 6-59 months was enrolled (April 2013). Children were tested for parasitaemia at monthly scheduled visits and at unscheduled sick visits from May to December 2013 using rapid diagnostic tests. ITN use the prior night and the condition of ITNs (based on presence of holes) was assessed by caregiver self-report. The incidence rate ratio (RR) comparing malaria infection among users and non-users of ITNs was modelled using generalized estimating equations adjusting for potential confounders and accounting for repeated measures on each child. The protective efficacy (PE) of ITN use was calculated as 1 - RR. RESULTS: In this cohort, self-reported ITN use remained consistently high (> 95%) over the study period. Although users of ITNs were slightly more protected compared to non-users of ITNs, the difference in incidence of infection was not statistically significant (RR 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-1.27). Among ITN users, malaria incidence was significantly lower in users of ITNs with no holes (of any size) compared to users of ITNs with ≥ 1 hole (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant PE of using 1-2 year-old ITNs on the incidence of malaria in children in an area of moderate pyrethroid resistance, but among ITN users, the authors found increased protection by ITNs with no holes compared to ITNs with holes. Given the moderate levels of pyrethroid resistance in the primary malaria vector and recent evidence of added benefits of ITNs with synergists or non-pyrethroid insecticides, next-generation ITNs may be a useful strategy to address pyrethroid resistance and should be further explored in Malawi.
Entities:
Keywords:
Holes; Insecticide resistance; Insecticide-treated bed nets; Malaria; Prevention; Vector control
Authors: Emily Ying Yang Chan; Tiffany Sze Tung Sham; Tayyab Salim Shahzada; Caroline Dubois; Zhe Huang; Sida Liu; Kevin K C Hung; Shelly L A Tse; Kin On Kwok; Pui-Hong Chung; Ryoma Kayano; Rajib Shaw Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hillary M Topazian; Austin Gumbo; Jonathan J Juliano; Irving Hoffman; Katerina Brandt; Michael Kayange; Jennifer S Smith; Jessie K Edwards; Varun Goel; Tisungane Mvalo; Michael Emch; Audrey E Pettifor Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2021-05
Authors: Rajiv Sarkar; Anne Kessler; Bandapkupar Mawkhlieng; Steven A Sullivan; Mark L Wilson; Jane M Carlton; Sandra Albert Journal: Malar J Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Peter W Gething; Samir Bhatt; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Caitlin A Bever; Hannah Koenker; Daniel J Weiss; Camilo Vargas-Ruiz; Anita K Nandi; Harry S Gibson; Joseph Harris; Katherine E Battle; Susan F Rumisha; Suzanne Keddie; Punam Amratia; Rohan Arambepola; Ewan Cameron; Elisabeth G Chestnutt; Emma L Collins; Justin Millar; Swapnil Mishra; Jennifer Rozier; Tasmin Symons; Katherine A Twohig; T Deirdre Hollingsworth Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Anne Meiwald; Emma Clark; Mojca Kristan; Constant Edi; Claire L Jeffries; Bethanie Pelloquin; Seth R Irish; Thomas Walker; Louisa A Messenger Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 7.759