| Literature DB >> 31941130 |
Qi Sun1, Tianlong Li1, Bing Liang2.
Abstract
A new type of cemented paste backfill (CPB) was prepared using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as the activator, slag and silica fume (SF) as the binder, and tailings as the aggregate. The effects of proportion of replacement of 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% silica fume on the properties of CPB were studied. The strength formation mechanism of CPB was explored through a combination of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The SEM images were analyzed by IMAGE J software, and the porosity of CPB with different silica fume contents was obtained. The results show that as the amount of silica fume increases, the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) increases first and then decreases. When the amount of silica fume was approximately 5%, CPB with a larger UCS can be obtained. When the silica fume content increased from 0% to 5%, because silica fume has good activity and small particles, more calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gels and Mg-Al type layered double hydrotalcites (LDHs) were generated in CPB, which made it denser and improved its strength compared with the non-silica fume group. C-S-H gels were the main source of CPB strength. With a further increase in the amount of silica fume, thaumasite produced inside of CPB, reducing the content of C-S-H gels. Moreover, due to the expansion of thaumasite, it is easy to generate a large number of micro cracks in CPB, which weakens the strength of CPB.Entities:
Keywords: alkali-activated silica fume and slag composite binder; cemented paste backfill; microstructure; strength formation mechanism
Year: 2020 PMID: 31941130 PMCID: PMC7014301 DOI: 10.3390/ma13020372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Particle size distribution of the tailings and binders.
Chemical composition of raw materials (wt. %).
| Materials | Cao | Fe2O3 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | MgO | Na2O | K2O | SO3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slag | 40.75 | 0.55 | 27.51 | 16.20 | 7.77 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 2.91 |
| SF | 1.70 | 0.65 | 95.59 | ‒ | 0.22 | ‒ | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| Tailings | 3.06 | 35.49 | 40.62 | 10.81 | 6.60 | ‒ | 1.03 | 0.47 |
Figure 2XRD pattern of tailings.
Details of the mixture proportions.
| MIX ID | Binder Proportion (wt %) | Alkaline and Admixture (by Binder Mass %) | Water-Binder Ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slag | SF | Alkaline | Super Plasticizer | ||
| SF0 | 100 | 0 | 4 | 0.2 | 2.1 |
| SF5 | 95 | 5 | 4 | 0.4 | 2.1 |
| SF10 | 90 | 10 | 4 | 0.6 | 2.1 |
| SF15 | 85 | 15 | 4 | 0.6 | 2.1 |
| SF20 | 80 | 20 | 4 | 1.0 | 2.1 |
Figure 3Compressive strength of different groups: (a) 3 days; (b) 7 days; (c) 14 days; and (d) 28 days.
Figure 4Micromorphology of cemented paste backfill (CPB) samples at 28 days: (a) SF0; (b) SF5; (c) SF10; (d) SF15; and (e) SF20.
Figure 5Energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) energy spectrum of LDHs intimately intermix with the C–S–H.
Figure 6EDS energy spectrum of C–S–H.
Figure 7EDS energy spectrum of thaumasite.
Figure 8EDS energy spectrum of LDHs cover C–S–H.
Figure 9FTIR spectrum of SF20.
Figure 10CPB pore structure analysis of different groups: (a) SF0; (b) SF5; (c) SF10; (d) SF15; and (e) SF20.
Porosity of the CPB samples.
| MIX ID | SF0 | SF5 | SF10 | SF15 | SF20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 23.08 | 18.38 | 25.08 | 27.19 | 24.03 |