OBJECTIVE: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) fail in up to 10% of patients due to the development of pump thrombosis. Remote monitoring of patients with LVADs can enable early detection and, subsequently, treatment and prevention of pump thrombosis. We assessed whether acoustical signals measured on the chest of patients with LVADs, combined with machine learning algorithms, can be used for detecting pump thrombosis. METHODS: 13 centrifugal pump (HVAD) recipients were enrolled in the study. When hospitalized for suspected pump thrombosis, clinical data and acoustical recordings were obtained at admission, prior to and after administration of thrombolytic therapy, and every 24 hours until laboratory and pump parameters normalized. First, we selected the most important features among our feature set using LDH-based correlation analysis. Then using these features, we trained a logistic regression model and determined our decision threshold to differentiate between thrombosis and non-thrombosis episodes. RESULTS: Accuracy, sensitivity and precision were calculated to be 88.9%, 90.9% and 83.3%, respectively. When tested on the post-thrombolysis data, our algorithm suggested possible pump abnormalities that were not identified by the reference pump power or biomarker abnormalities. SIGNIFICANCE: We showed that the acoustical signatures of LVADs can be an index of mechanical deterioration and, when combined with machine learning algorithms, provide clinical decision support regarding the presence of pump thrombosis.
OBJECTIVE: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) fail in up to 10% of patients due to the development of pump thrombosis. Remote monitoring of patients with LVADs can enable early detection and, subsequently, treatment and prevention of pump thrombosis. We assessed whether acoustical signals measured on the chest of patients with LVADs, combined with machine learning algorithms, can be used for detecting pump thrombosis. METHODS: 13 centrifugal pump (HVAD) recipients were enrolled in the study. When hospitalized for suspected pump thrombosis, clinical data and acoustical recordings were obtained at admission, prior to and after administration of thrombolytic therapy, and every 24 hours until laboratory and pump parameters normalized. First, we selected the most important features among our feature set using LDH-based correlation analysis. Then using these features, we trained a logistic regression model and determined our decision threshold to differentiate between thrombosis and non-thrombosis episodes. RESULTS: Accuracy, sensitivity and precision were calculated to be 88.9%, 90.9% and 83.3%, respectively. When tested on the post-thrombolysis data, our algorithm suggested possible pump abnormalities that were not identified by the reference pump power or biomarker abnormalities. SIGNIFICANCE: We showed that the acoustical signatures of LVADs can be an index of mechanical deterioration and, when combined with machine learning algorithms, provide clinical decision support regarding the presence of pump thrombosis.
Authors: Antolin S Flores; Michael Essandoh; Gregory C Yerington; Amar M Bhatt; Manoj H Iyer; William Perez; Victor R Davila; Ravi S Tripathi; Katja Turner; Galina Dimitrova; Michael J Andritsos Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: M C Oz; M Argenziano; K A Catanese; M T Gardocki; D J Goldstein; R C Ashton; A C Gelijns; E A Rose; H R Levin Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-04-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Per Sundbom; Michael Roth; Hans Granfeldt; Daniel M Karlsson; Henrik Ahn; Fredrik Gustafsson; Laila Hubbert Journal: Int J Artif Organs Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 1.595
Authors: Beren Semiz; Sinan Hersek; Daniel C Whittingslow; Lori Ponder; Sampath Prahalad; Omer T Inan Journal: IEEE Sens J Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 3.301
Authors: Nir Uriel; Kerry A Morrison; Arthur R Garan; Tomoko S Kato; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Farhana Latif; Susan W Restaino; Donna M Mancini; Margaret Flannery; Hiroo Takayama; Ranjit John; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; Ulrich P Jorde Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Tal Hasin; Yariv Marmor; Walter Kremers; Yan Topilsky; Cathy J Severson; John A Schirger; Barry A Boilson; Alfredo L Clavell; Richard J Rodeheffer; Robert P Frantz; Brooks S Edwards; Naveen L Pereira; John M Stulak; Lyle Joyce; Richard Daly; Soon J Park; Sudhir S Kushwaha Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Carmelo A Milano; Joseph G Rogers; Antone J Tatooles; Geetha Bhat; Mark S Slaughter; Emma J Birks; Nahush A Mokadam; Claudius Mahr; Jeffrey S Miller; David W Markham; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Nir Uriel; Keith D Aaronson; Thomas A Vassiliades; Francis D Pagani Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Nicholas G Smedira; Katherine J Hoercher; Brian Lima; Maria M Mountis; Randall C Starling; Lucy Thuita; Darlene M Schmuhl; Eugene H Blackstone Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Francesco Moscato; Christoph Gross; Martin Maw; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Marcus Granegger; Daniel Zimpfer; Heinrich Schima Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2021-03
Authors: Boyla O Mainsah; Priyesh A Patel; Xinlin J Chen; Cameron Olsen; Leslie M Collins; Ravi Karra Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 5.501