| Literature DB >> 31940318 |
Roberto Alfonso Accinelli1,2,3, Juan Alonso Leon-Abarca1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES, for Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar in Spanish) is carried out annually in Peru. Based on it, the anemia prevalence was 43.6% in 2016 and 43.8% in 2017 using the WHO cutoff value of 11 g/dL and the altitude-correction equation.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31940318 PMCID: PMC6961872 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Distribution of children allocation and mean hemoglobin differences by variables.
| Variables | % (95% CI) | Hb (g/dL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | n | Yes | n | p | |||
| Other variables | Solid fuel exposure | 34.8% ± 1.7 | 11.6 ± 0.04 | 6906 | 11.9 ± 0.1 | 4371 | |
| Chronic malnutrition | 27.2% ± 1.3 | 11.6 ± 0.04 | 6120 | 11.8 ± 0.1 | 5216 | ||
| Clean water measures | 89.4% ± 0.9 | 11.3 ± 0.1 | 1246 | 11.7 ± 0.04 | 10118 | ||
| Poverty | 48.9% ± 1.8 | 11.6 ± 0.1 | 5109 | 11.8 ± 0.1 | 6255 | ||
| Sex | Male | 50.04% ± 1.3 | 11.6 ± 0.1 | 5771 | |||
| Female | 49.96% ± 1.3 | ||||||
| Age (mo) | 6–23 | 60.5% ± 1.2 | 11.4 ± 0.1 | 6905 | |||
| 24–35 | 39.5% ± 1.2 | ||||||
| Altitude | Low (0–1524) | 69.7% ± 1.6 | 11.2 ± 0.04 | 7398 | |||
| Moderate (1524 to 2438) | 6.5% ± 1.0 | ||||||
| High (2438–3657) | 17.3% ± 1.6 | ||||||
| Very high (3657–5486) | 6.6% ± 0.9 | ||||||
Percentages and unadjusted means are estimated based on DHS methodology. Total n = 11364, except where missing and invalid values existed as coded in the original database. Hb = hemoglobin, mo = months
Data distribution using altitude thresholds.
| Altitudes | n | Solid fuel exposure | N | Chronic malnutrition | n | Clean water measures | N | Poverty | n | 6–23 months | n | 24–35 months | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 7398 | 24.1% ± 1.8 | 2096 | 21.5% ± 1.4 | 1654 | 89.2% ± 1.1 | 6428 | 38.5% ± 2.2 | 3390 | 60.4% ± 1.5 | 4467 | 39.6% ± 1.5 | 2931 |
| Moderate | 855 | 44.6% ± 6.3 | 365 | 30.0% ± 4.8 | 239 | 86.9% ± 4.0 | 773 | 57.7% ± 6.0 | 492 | 63.1% ± 3.4 | 531 | 36.9% ± 3.6 | 324 |
| High | 2220 | 63.5% ± 3.9 | 1400 | 41.7% ± 2.8 | 888 | 90.3% ± 2.1 | 2076 | 75.1% ± 3.2 | 1676 | 59.9% ± 2.4 | 1361 | 40.1% ± 2.4 | 859 |
| Very high | 891 | 62.6% ± 5.7 | 510 | 46.7% ± 5.1 | 434 | 91.1% ± 2.4 | 841 | 82.3% ± 4.0 | 697 | 60.8% ± 3.6 | 546 | 39.2% ± 3.7 | 345 |
Percentages shown represent children affected by each variable in each category along with the number of observations used.
Linear regressions of hemoglobin (g/dL) by altitude.
| Variables | Low altitude | Moderate altitude (1524 to 2438 m) | High altitude | Very high altitude (3657–5486 m) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | p | Coefficient | P | Coefficient | p | Coefficient | P | |
| Solid fuel exposure | -0.13 | 0.06 | 0.608 | -0.11 | 0.129 | -0.01 | 0.95 | |
| Chronic malnutrition | -0.12 | -0.02 | 0.892 | 0.05 | 0.407 | 0.09 | 0.517 | |
| Clean water | 0.33 | -0.04 | 0.792 | 0.05 | 0.656 | -0.05 | 0.73 | |
| Poverty | -0.27 | -0.52 | 0.01 | 0.894 | 0.05 | 0.738 | ||
| Age | 0.61 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.57 | ||||
| Sex | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.003 | 0.15 | 0.13 | ||
| Interaction: Poverty and solid fuel use | -0.001 | 0.996 | -0.53 | 0.19 | 0.183 | -0.15 | 0.562 | |
| Interaction: Poverty and chronic malnutrition | 0.01 | 0.882 | 0.33 | 0.148 | -0.11 | 0.46 | 0.06 | 0.793 |
| Constant term | 10.01 | 11.26 | 11.79 | 12.5 | ||||
Each model has a p<0.0001.
*6–23 months vs 24–35 months.
**Male vs female.
+Expected hemoglobin value when all other variables = 0
Fig 1Hemoglobin trends according to observed and WHO altitude-corrected values.
Red line parallel to X axis represents the 11 g/dL anemia threshold and the red line parallel to Y axis the 11000 feet boundary of WHO/CDC altitude-correction factor equation.
Hemoglobin (g/dL) in healthy children along estimated population anemia rates based on p5 (2017).
| Altitude | Ages (mo) | n | Mean Hb* | SD | p5 | Estimated prevalence | [95% CI] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 6–23 | 3318 | 11 | 1.1 | 9 | 5.20% | 4.40% | 6.10% |
| 24–35 | 2416 | 11.6 | 0.9 | 10 | 14.30% | 12.80% | 16.00% | |
| Moderate | 6–23 | 364 | 11.9 | 1.2 | 9.8 | 6.30% | 4.40% | 8.90% |
| 24–35 | 252 | 12.7 | 1 | 11 | 11.40% | 7.80% | 16.50% | |
| High | 6–23 | 747 | 12.6 | 1.2 | 10.6 | 1.30% | 0.70% | 2.30% |
| 24–35 | 584 | 13.3 | 1 | 11.5 | 1.00% | 0.40% | 2.50% | |
| Very high | 6–23 | 242 | 13.2 | 1.4 | 10.5 | 5.00% | 3.10% | 7.80% |
| 24–35 | 215 | 13.9 | 1 | 12.4 | 7.40% | 4.50% | 12.00% | |
| Total | 7.30% | 6.60% | 7.90% | |||||
Differences between age groups and altitude with a p<0.0001. Hb = hemoglobin, mo = months
Hemoglobin (g/dL) in healthy children along estimated population anemia rates based on p5.
| Altitude | Ages (mo) | n | Mean Hb* | SD | p5 (2016) | p5 | 2016 | [95% CI] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 6–23 | 2937 | 10.9 | 1.1 | 9 | 9 | 4.70% | 4.00% | 5.60% |
| 24–35 | 2216 | 11.6 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 13.90% | 12.40% | 15.60% | |
| Moderate | 6–23 | 337 | 12 | 1.2 | 10 | 9.8 | 4.40% | 2.50% | 7.60% |
| 24–35 | 269 | 12.7 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 9.20% | 6.40% | 13.10% | |
| High | 6–23 | 689 | 12.5 | 1.4 | 10.1 | 10.6 | 2.30% | 1.50% | 3.60% |
| 24–35 | 499 | 13.3 | 1 | 11.6 | 11.5 | 0.80% | 0.30% | 1.90% | |
| Very high | 6–23 | 216 | 13.2 | 1.4 | 10.8 | 10.5 | 5.80% | 3.70% | 9.10% |
| 24–35 | 181 | 14 | 1.1 | 12.1 | 12.4 | 9.10% | 6.30% | 13.00% | |
| Total | 7.30% | 6.70% | 8.00% | ||||||
Differences between age groups and altitude are significant at a p<0.0001 (2016 data, 11163 children from 6 to 35 months). 2017 p5 cutoffs used for percentage and CI estimation. Hb = hemoglobin, mo = months
Fig 2Hemoglobin percentiles by age and altitude categories (masl).
In order, from bottom to top: p5 (blue), p50 (red), p95 (green). Percentile curves as estimated using altitude of residence show that Hb increases along with age. However, some differences arise: At lower altitudes, the p5 curve follows the equation 8.47+ 2.87*10−2*x+ 6.04*10−4*x2 and p50 follows the equation 10.16+ 6.12*10−2*x- 5.02*10−4*x2. At moderate altitudes the p5 curve follows the equation 9.94–5.17*10−2*x+ 2.45*10−3*x2 with the lowest estimated value found at 10.6 months, and the p50 curve follows the equation 11.20+ 5.81*10−2*x- 2.72*10−5*x2 which shows an upward trend across the age range. At high altitudes the p5 curve follows the equation 10.55–4.08*10−2*x+ 2.38*10−3*x2 with the lowest estimated value found at 8.6 months. The p50 equation is 12.20+ 2.42*10−2*x+ 4.11*10−4*x2, which follows an upward curve for the age range. At very high altitudes p5 follows 11.49–10.09*10−2*x+ 4*10−3*x2 with the lowest estimated value found at 12.5 months. The p50 follows 13.15+ 1.31*10−3*x+ 9.78*10−4*x2 which has an upward trend for the given age range.
Anemia rates by Peruvian political regions (2017), sorted by official anemia rates.
| Political region | Natural region (survey data) | WHO definition | Hb with 11g/dl cutoff | p5 cutoff | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Puno | H+R | 75.60% | 5.80% | 8.00% |
| 2 | Loreto | R | 61.50% | 61.50% | 16.00% |
| 3 | Ucayali | R | 59.20% | 59.20% | 20.10% |
| 4 | Pasco | H+R | 58.40% | 25.10% | 10.20% |
| 5 | Madre de Dios | R | 57.60% | 57.60% | 12.30% |
| 6 | Cusco | H+R | 56.60% | 7.50% | 3.10% |
| 7 | Huancavelica | C+H | 55.10% | 3.80% | 2.10% |
| 8 | Apurimac | H | 55.10% | 4.30% | 1.00% |
| 9 | Junin | H+R | 53.90% | 15.40% | 5.40% |
| 10 | San Martin | R | 51.30% | 49.10% | 8.50% |
| 11 | Amazonas | H+R | 51.00% | 38.00% | 9.60% |
| 12 | Ayacucho | H+R | 49.30% | 10.90% | 1.40% |
| 13 | Tumbes | C | 46.70% | 46.70% | 12.00% |
| 14 | Huanuco | H+R | 44.60% | 17.50% | 6.70% |
| 15 | |||||
| 16 | Ancash | C+H | 42.40% | 17.00% | 3.30% |
| 17 | Piura | C+H | 41.70% | 39.10% | 8.10% |
| 18 | La Libertad | C+H | 41.40% | 26.00% | 5.50% |
| 19 | Ica | H+R | 39.80% | 39.30% | 6.70% |
| 20 | Tacna | C+H | 38.00% | 33.10% | 6.80% |
| 21 | Moquegua | C+H | 37.60% | 27.60% | 6.30% |
| 22 | Lambayeque | C+H | 37.40% | 36.50% | 6.00% |
| 23 | Cajamarca | C+H+R | 37.40% | 12.80% | 4.60% |
| 24 | Arequipa | C+H | 34.90% | 11.90% | 3.90% |
| 25 | Lima | C+H | 34.70% | 34.30% | 7.60% |
| 26 | Callao | C | 32.80% | 32.80% | 7.60% |
Natural regions: C = Coast, H = Highlands, R = Rain forest.
Fig 3Anemia rates by political regions.
(A) Anemia using WHO guidelines. The numbers correspond to political regions as presented in Table 4. (B) Anemia using Hb <11g/dl as cutoff point. (C) Recalculated anemia using p5.
Anemia rates by natural regions and altitude.
| Anemia rates by | WHO | p5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural regions | Coast | 36.1%ᵃ | 5.3%ᵈ |
| Highlands | 52.4%ᵇ | 3.3%ᵉ | |
| Rain forest | 53.8%ᶜ | 13.5%ᶠ | |
| Altitude | Low | 40.5%g | 8.8%h |
| Moderate | 37.1%i | 8.2%j | |
| High | 49.6%k | 1.2%l | |
| Very high | 70.5%m | 5.9%n | |
Linear combination of estimates p value: ab, ac, de, df, ef, gk, gm, ik, im, km, hl, jl, ln = <0.0001; bc = 0.395; gi = 0.804; hj = 0.597; hn = 0.036; jn = 0.72.