| Literature DB >> 31940278 |
Stinus Hansen1,2, Niklas Rye Jørgensen3,4, Anne Pernille Hermann5,6, Rene Klinkby Støving5,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery is an effective treatment for morbid obesity. A possible overlooked side effect is negative bone metabolic consequences.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31940278 PMCID: PMC7087496 DOI: 10.1530/EJE-19-0741
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Endocrinol ISSN: 0804-4643 Impact factor: 6.664
General characteristics and biochemistry results in patients at baseline and 2 and 7 years after Roux-en-y gastric bypass surgery.
| Baseline | 2 years | 7 years | % change baseline vs 7 years | % change 2 vs 7 years | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | – | – | – | – | |
| Age (years) | 43 ± 9 | – | – | – | – |
| Sex (female/male) | 10/7 | – | – | – | – |
| Premenopausal* | 9 | 7 | 6 | – | – |
| Postmenopausal | 1 | – | 4 | – | – |
| Type 2 diabetes | 5 | – | – | – | – |
| Height (m) | 174 ± 8 | 174 ± 8 | 174 ± 8 | −0.1 ± 0.5 | 0.0 ± 0.4 |
| Weight (kg) | 127 ± 20 | 95 ± 19‡ | 101 ± 26 | −21 ± 11‡ | 6 ± 12 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 42 ± 6 | 31 ± 5‡ | 33 ± 8 | −21 ± 11‡ | 5 ± 12 |
| Lean mass (kg) | 71 ± 16 | 62 ± 14‡ | 61 ± 15 | −5 ± 7‡ | −2 ± 6 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 55 ± 12 | 34 ± 11‡ | 41 ± 15 | −27 ± 17‡ | 20 ± 24§ |
| Ionized calcium (mmol/L) | 1.24 ± 0.05 | 1.26 ± 0.04 | 1.23 ± 0.05 | −0.7 ± 5 | −2 ± 4 |
| Parathyroid hormone (pmol/L) | 5.5 ± 2.1 | 4.7 ± 2.3 | 5.9 ± 2.5 | 15 (−67 to 175) | 16 (−57 to 80) |
| 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (nmol/L) | 38 ± 21 | 100 ± 27‡ | 100 ± 35 | 316 ± 385‡ | −2 ± 30 |
Laboratory reference intervals: Ionized calcium (1.18–1.32 mmol/L), Parathyroid hormone (1.1–6.9 pmol/L).
*Note that three women became postmenopausal during follow-up. Shown as mean ± s.d. or median (range) as appropriate. † and ‡ indicate significance of differences compared to baseline. § and | indicate significance of differences between the 2- and 7-year values. ‡P < 0.001 and §P < 0.05.
Figure 1Diagram showing the number of participants at baseline, 2 and 7 years of follow-up. *Two women entered menopause within 2 years from surgery and were excluded from the previous 2-year analysis (9). In the present study, they were included in both the 2- and 7-year analyses.
Figure 2Mean changes in body weight (A), body fat mass (B), lumbar spine aBMD (C) and total hip aBMD by DEXA (D) after 2 and 7 years of follow-up. *P < 0.05 for comparison vs baseline and # for P < 0.05 vs 2-year value. Error bars = s.e.m.
Figure 3Mean changes in P1NP and CTX after 2 and 7 years of follow-up. *P < 0.001 for comparison vs baseline and # for P < 0.05 vs 2-year value. Error bars = s.e.m.
Bone geometry, vBMD, microarchitecture and estimated bone strength using HR-pQCT in patients at baseline, 2 and 7 years after Roux-en-y gastric bypass surgery.
| Baseline ( | 2 years ( | 7 years ( | % change baseline vs 7 years | % change 2 vs 7 years | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radius | |||||
| Cortical area, mm2 | 71 ± 15 | 69 ± 16 | 66 ± 17 | −6 ± 9† | −4 ± 8‡ |
| Cortical thickness, mm | 0.95 (0.54–1.12) | 0.95 (0.48–1.09) | 0.91 (0.50–1.10) | −4 ± 7* | −1 ± 7 |
| Cortical porosity, % | 1.30 (0.39–3.90) | 1.41 (0.44–4.13) | 1.98 (0.58–6.69) | 33 ± 49* | 13 ± 36 |
| Trabecular area, mm2 | 266 ± 89 | 266 ± 88 | 268 ± 88 | 1 ± 3† | 1 ± 2‡ |
| Total vBMD, mg/cm3 | 339 ± 53 | 326 ± 54 | 294 ± 54 | −13 ± 8† | −10 ± 7§ |
| Cortical vBMD, mg/cm3 | 902 (768–987) | 895 (734–971) | 880 (721–932) | −2 ± 3† | −2 ± 2‡ |
| Trabecular vBMD, mg/cm3 | 171 ± 48 | 160 ± 46* | 131 ± 43 | −24 ± 12† | −18 ± 14† |
| Trabecular number, 1/mm | 2.12 ± 0.31 | 1.99 ± 0.29 | 1.85 ± 0.46 | −13 ± 16† | −7 ± 19 |
| Trabecular thickness, mm | 0.067 ± 0.02 | 0.066 ± 0.01 | 0.058 ± 0.01 | −12 ± 8† | −11 ± 10§ |
| Trabecular separation, mm | 0.395 (0.334–0.560) | 0.423 (0.327–0.598) | 0.437 (0.376–1.168) | 25 ± 30† | 17 ± 34‡ |
| Trabecular network inhomogeneity, mm | 0.151 (0.121–0.229) | 0.174 (0.122–0.281)* | 0.186 (0.140–0.818) | 66 ± 94† | 53 ± 116‡ |
| Estimated failure load, | 5152 ± 1549 | 4922 ± 1484* | 4272 ± 1400 | −15 ± 9† | −11 ± 8§ |
| Tibia | |||||
| Cortical area, mm2 | 160 ± 35 | 147 ± 32† | 141 ± 37 | −12 ± 8† | −4 ± 7 |
| Cortical thickness, mm | 1.38 ± 0.20 | 1.30 ± 0.19† | 1.28 ± 0.21 | −7 ± 8† | −2 ± 5 |
| Cortical porosity, % | 5.94 ± 2.68 | 6.05 ± 2.81* | 7.06 ± 3.31 | 25 ± 44† | 5 ± 17 |
| Trabecular area, mm2 | 687 ± 132 | 697 ± 134† | 702 ± 129 | 2 ± 2† | 1 ± 1 |
| Total vBMD, mg/cm3 | 324 ± 43 | 300 ± 53† | 277 ± 48 | −14 ± 8† | −7 ± 8§ |
| Cortical vBMD, mg/cm3 | 883 ± 40 | 864 ± 53† | 848 ± 55 | −4 ± 4† | −2 ± 2‡ |
| Trabecular vBMD, mg/cm3 | 190 ± 39 | 175 ± 42† | 157 ± 35 | −17 ± 10† | −9 ± 12§ |
| Trabecular number, 1/mm | 2.33 ± 0.33 | 2.11 ± 0.40† | 2.06 ± 0.43 | −12 ± 10† | −2 ± 13 |
| Trabecular thickness, mm | 0.066 (0.058–0.092) | 0.067 (0.048–0.086) | 0.064 (0.041–0.079) | −3 ± 14 | −4 ± 11‡ |
| Trabecular separation, mm | 0.345 (0.287–0.512) | 0.381 (0.320–0.709)† | 0.411 (0.309–0.703) | 19 ± 14† | 6 ± 15 |
| Trabecular network inhomogeneity, mm | 0.140 (0.108–0.327) | 0.157 (0.118–0.530)† | 0.168 (0.113–0.489) | 29 ± 26† | 10 ± 24 |
| Estimated failure load, | 13431 ± 2457 | 12631 ± 2695† | 11341 ± 2627 | −15 ± 8† | −8 ± 8§ |
Please note that one woman was omitted from the analyses due to bisphosphonate treatment. Data are means ± s.d. or median (range) as appropriate. * and † indicate significance of differences compared to baseline. ‡ and § indicate significance of differences between the 2- and 7-year values.
*P < 0.05, †P < 0.001, ‡P < 0.05 and §P < 0.001.
vBMD, volumetric bone mineral density.