Literature DB >> 31940010

Sex Differences in Blood Pressure Trajectories Over the Life Course.

Hongwei Ji1,2,3, Andy Kim1,2,4, Joseph E Ebinger5, Teemu J Niiranen6,7, Brian L Claggett1, C Noel Bairey Merz4, Susan Cheng1,2,4.   

Abstract

Importance: If we assume that women and men exhibit variations of the same fundamental vascular physiology, then conventional analyses of subclinical measures would suggest that women catch up to men by midlife in the extent of potentially important vascular disease. Alternatively, under the assumption that vascular physiology may fundamentally differ between women and men, a sex-specific analysis of existing data could offer new insights and augment our understanding of sex differences in cardiovascular diseases. Objective: To evaluate whether longitudinal patterns of blood pressure (BP) elevation differ between women and men during the life course when considering baseline BP levels as the reference. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted sex-specific analyses of longitudinal BP measures (144 599 observations) collected for a period of 43 years (1971 to 2014) in 4 community-based US cohort studies. The combined total included 32 833 participants (54% female) spanning ages 5 to 98 years. Data were analyzed between May 4, 2019, and August 5, 2019. Exposures: Age and serially assessed longitudinal BP measures: systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP). Main Outcomes and Measures: Sex-specific change in each primary BP measure compared with baseline BP levels, derived from multilevel longitudinal models fitted over the age span, and new-onset cardiovascular disease events.
Results: Of the 32 833 participants, 17 733 were women (54%). Women compared with men exhibited a steeper increase in BP that began as early as in the third decade and continued through the life course (likelihood ratio test χ2 = 531 for systolic BP; χ2 = 123 for diastolic BP; χ2 = 325 for MAP; and χ2 = 572 for PP; P for all <.001). After adjustment for multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors, these between-sex differences in all BP trajectories persisted (likelihood ratio test χ2 = 314 for systolic BP; χ2 = 31 for diastolic BP; χ2 = 129 for MAP; and χ2 = 485 for PP; P for all <.001). Conclusions and Relevance: In contrast with the notion that important vascular disease processes in women lag behind men by 10 to 20 years, sex-specific analyses indicate that BP measures actually progress more rapidly in women than in men, beginning early in life. This early-onset sexual dimorphism may set the stage for later-life cardiovascular diseases that tend to present differently, not simply later, in women compared with men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31940010      PMCID: PMC6990675          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   30.154


  31 in total

1.  Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  E O'Brien; F Mee; N Atkins; K O'Malley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Race and Sex Differences of Long-Term Blood Pressure Profiles From Childhood and Adult Hypertension: The Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Tao Zhang; Shengxu Li; Huijie Zhang; Bo Xi; Hongbing Shen; Camilo Fernandez; Lydia Bazzano; Jiang He; Wei Chen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure. The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  S S Franklin; W Gustin; N D Wong; M G Larson; M A Weber; W B Kannel; D Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Pathophysiology: Why Women Are Overrepresented in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Anna L Beale; Philippe Meyer; Thomas H Marwick; Carolyn S P Lam; David M Kaye
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Combination therapy versus monotherapy in reducing blood pressure: meta-analysis on 11,000 participants from 42 trials.

Authors:  David S Wald; Malcolm Law; Joan K Morris; Jonathan P Bestwick; Nicholas J Wald
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Blood pressure tracking over the adult life course: patterns and correlates in the Framingham heart study.

Authors:  Susan Cheng; Vanessa Xanthakis; Lisa M Sullivan; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Pulsatile hemodynamics in patients with exertional dyspnea: potentially of value in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Thomas Weber; Siegfried Wassertheurer; Michael F O'Rourke; Anton Haiden; Robert Zweiker; Martin Rammer; Bernhard Hametner; Bernd Eber
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Acute Myocardial Infarction in Women: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Laxmi S Mehta; Theresa M Beckie; Holli A DeVon; Cindy L Grines; Harlan M Krumholz; Michelle N Johnson; Kathryn J Lindley; Viola Vaccarino; Tracy Y Wang; Karol E Watson; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Placental vascular dysfunction, fetal and childhood growth, and cardiovascular development: the generation R study.

Authors:  Romy Gaillard; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; Albert Hofman; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  69 in total

1.  Error in Author Affiliation.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 2.  Summary of Updated Recommendations for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Leslie Cho; Melinda Davis; Islam Elgendy; Kelly Epps; Kathryn J Lindley; Puja K Mehta; Erin D Michos; Margo Minissian; Carl Pepine; Viola Vaccarino; Annabelle Santos Volgman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Blood Pressure Management in Stroke.

Authors:  Philip B Gorelick; Paul K Whelton; Farzaneh Sorond; Robert M Carey
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 4.  The Impact of Sex and Gender on Stroke.

Authors:  Kathryn M Rexrode; Tracy E Madsen; Amy Y X Yu; Cheryl Carcel; Judith H Lichtman; Eliza C Miller
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Elevated exercise blood pressure in middle-aged women is associated with altered left ventricular and vascular stiffness.

Authors:  Satyam Sarma; Erin Howden; Graeme Carrick-Ranson; Justin Lawley; Christopher Hearon; Mitchel Samels; Braden Everding; Sheryl Livingston; Beverley Adams-Huet; M Dean Palmer; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-04-02

6.  Trajectories of Blood Pressure Control a Year After Randomization and Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes in SPRINT.

Authors:  Charles A German; Tali Elfassy; Matthew J Singleton; Carlos J Rodriguez; Walter T Ambrosius; Joseph Yeboah
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  Bending Primordial Trajectories Away From Heart Failure.

Authors:  Alan C Kwan; Gerran Salto; Susan Cheng
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Trajectories of Blood Pressure in Midlife Women: Does Menopause Matter?

Authors:  Saad Samargandy; Karen A Matthews; Maria M Brooks; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Jared W Magnani; Rebecca C Thurston; Samar R El Khoudary
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Incident Non-AIDS Comorbidity Burden Among Women With or at Risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the United States.

Authors:  Lauren F Collins; Anandi N Sheth; C Christina Mehta; Susanna Naggie; Elizabeth T Golub; Kathryn Anastos; Audrey L French; Seble Kassaye; Tonya N Taylor; Margaret A Fischl; Adaora A Adimora; Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Frank J Palella; Phyllis C Tien; Ighovwerha Ofotokun
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Sex differences in the time course and mechanisms of vascular and cardiac aging in mice: role of the smooth muscle cell mineralocorticoid receptor.

Authors:  Jennifer J DuPont; Seung Kyum Kim; Rachel M Kenney; Iris Z Jaffe
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.