Takashi Shirasaka1, Michinobu Nagao2, Yuzo Yamasaki3, Tsukasa Kojima1, Masatoshi Kondo1, Hiroshi Hamasaki1, Takeshi Kamitani3, Toyoyuki Kato1, Yoshiki Asayama4. 1. From the Division of Radiology, Department of Medical Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Fukuoka Prefecture. 2. Department of Diagnostic Imaging & Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo. 3. Departments of Clinical Radiology. 4. Advanced Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography with a low kilovoltage peak scan and a refined scan timing prediction using a small contrast medium (CM) dose. METHODS: In protocol A, 120-kVp scanning and a standard CM dose were used. The scan timing was fixed. In protocol B, 80 kVp and a 60% CM dose were used. The scan timing was determined according to the interval from the CM arrival to the peak time in the ascending aorta. We measured the CT number and recorded the radiation dose. RESULTS: Higher CT numbers were observed in the left circumflex (proximal, P = 0.0235; middle, P = 0.0007; distal, P < 0.0001) in protocol B compared with protocol A. The radiation dose in protocol B was significantly lower than in protocol A (2.2 ± 0.9 vs 4.3 ± 1.7 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: Low-contrast, low-radiation dose, high-image quality coronary CT angiography can be performed with low kilovoltage peak scanning and a refined scan timing prediction.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography with a low kilovoltage peak scan and a refined scan timing prediction using a small contrast medium (CM) dose. METHODS: In protocol A, 120-kVp scanning and a standard CM dose were used. The scan timing was fixed. In protocol B, 80 kVp and a 60% CM dose were used. The scan timing was determined according to the interval from the CM arrival to the peak time in the ascending aorta. We measured the CT number and recorded the radiation dose. RESULTS: Higher CT numbers were observed in the left circumflex (proximal, P = 0.0235; middle, P = 0.0007; distal, P < 0.0001) in protocol B compared with protocol A. The radiation dose in protocol B was significantly lower than in protocol A (2.2 ± 0.9 vs 4.3 ± 1.7 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: Low-contrast, low-radiation dose, high-image quality coronary CT angiography can be performed with low kilovoltage peak scanning and a refined scan timing prediction.